🧵🚨 U.S. v. Peter Navarro is a landmark case of first impression. At stake: executive privilege & the very doctrine of constitutional separation of powers. This is SCOTUS-level “good law” waiting to be settled.
DOJ flipped position on Friday and it's HUGE -- Keep reading now!
Tip of the cap to @kyledcheney for flagging DOJ’s latest filing — where Trump’s DOJ flipped sides in support of @realpnavarro. But shame on @AP, @Reuters, @washingtonpost, @Law360, @business, & @CourthouseNews for ignoring this critical story.
Key Issue #1 ➡️ Do senior White House advisors have absolute testimonial immunity?
For more than 50 years, DOJ policy said YES. Biden’s weaponized DOJ flipped that precedent to put Navarro in prison. NOW SCOTUS must step in.
SCOTUS must rule or every future advisor faces Hobson’s choice: honor executive privilege & risk prison or prostrate before partisan jackals on Capitol Hill.
NOT a partisan issue. Executive privilege role in promoting sound presidential decision-making at stake.
Both Republican & Democrat presidents need trusted advisors who can speak candidly without fear of subpoenas.
If SCOTUS doesn’t fix what Biden’s DOJ broke, every future White House is at risk. I went to prison/fighting my case so this doesn't happen.
Key Issue #2 ➡️ Is invocation of executive privilege presumptive?
Yes. But a Democrat judge wrongly said “no” — and then violated constitutional separation of powers by trying to dictate to Donald Trump how he must invoke. Outrageous judicial overreach.
The high stakes: Executive privilege. Separation of powers. Rule of law.
Media blackout stunning. @AP @Reuters @washingtonpost @Law360 @business @CourthouseNews — why are you ignoring a Supreme Court case that will shape the presidency for generations?
Read my story of how weaponized justice put me in Miami federal prison for doing my duty & protecting Constitution.
👉 Order today on Amazon:
📘 I Went To Prison So You Won’t Have To — part Stephen King, part Kafka, part Joseph Heller, all Navarro.bit.ly/4luaeFZ
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 India’s keyboard minions are hijacking X’s Community Notes to bury the facts.
They’re furious about losing unfettered access to U.S. markets—even as India, the Maharaja of Tariffs, keeps some of the world’s highest trade barriers.
2/ I posted the facts:
•India’s sky-high tariffs cost U.S. jobs.
•India buys Russian oil purely to profit.
•Those revenues fuel Putin’s war machine.
Frenzied Indian partisans swarmed—and cobbled together a flimsy Community Note to protest the truth.
3/ Their source for the Community Note? An article from The Times of India. Archived here ➡️ archive.is/HxBYQ
But the article proved me right, admitting:
👉India’s imports from Russia hit $67 billion in 2024—$53 billion of that was crude oil.
👉In 2021, before Ukraine: India’s total imports from Russia were just $8.7 billion.
🧵 One FBI. Two bad apples. BOTH from the same family.
Recently fired Special Agent Walter Giardina — who orchestrated my wrongful arrest — and his FATHER-IN-LAW former FBI Deputy Director Larry A. Potts.
This is the chilling saga of 2 disgraced agents linked by blood who have forever stained the Bureau’s reputation.
2/ Bad apple Larry Potts was FBI’s #2, demoted after two of the deadliest failures in Bureau history: Ruby Ridge and Waco.
3/ At Ruby Ridge, Potts was in the oversight chain when the FBI adopted special “rules of engagement” stating: “Any armed adult male… could and should be shot.”
1/ President Trump’s 50% tariffs on Indian imports are now in effect.
This isn’t just about India’s unfair trade—it’s about cutting off the financial lifeline India has extended to Putin’s war machine. 🧵
2/ Here’s how the India-Russia oil mathematics works:
American consumers buy Indian goods while India keeps out U.S. exports through high tariffs and non-tariff barriers.
India uses our dollars to buy discounted Russian crude.
3/ Indian refiners, with their silent Russian partners, refine and flip the black-market oil for big profits on the international market – while Russia pockets hard currency to fund its war on Ukraine.
1/ The Wall Street Journal has been waging war on Trump’s tariffs since day one—predicting a “Navarro Recession,” runaway inflation, and economic collapse.
They’ve been WRONG every time.
Here are the top 5 myths they’ve pushed.
Let’s SHATTER them. 🧵
2/ Myth #1 — “Tariffs Are a Tax on Americans”
– The Myth the WSJ Doesn’t Want to Let Die
The WSJ said prices would spike.
Reality: Exporters absorbed the tariffs. No sticker shock on Asian electronics and European autos.
3/ Myth #2 — “Tariffs Create Chaos”
The WSJ confuses leverage with volatility.
It’s true that it’s not business as usual: America is WINNING now.
Tariffs forced deals that milquetoast diplomacy couldn’t dream of:
• The EU agreed to cut industrial tariffs & open ag markets.
• Japan pledged $350 billion to rebuild U.S. supply chains.
• Korea’s Hyundai/Kia investing billions in U.S. EV & battery plants.