Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
@kikas6652
Aug 31, 2025 • 42 tweets • 17 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
🧵EXPOSED: A leaked document reveals that Reporters without Borders & Avaaz have secured the participation of around 150 media outlets from some 50 countries, alongside journalists and press freedom organisations, instructing them to publish the same message, on the same day Image
The leaked doc instructs to post on the same day, same hashtags, same message. Black front pages, scripted TV, coordinated feeds. T
Their unified script?

“At the rate journalists are being killed in Gaza by the Israeli army, there will soon be no one left to keep you informed.” Image
Leaked doc show outlets were given strict instructions:
📰 Print – blacked-out front pages with one message
📺 Broadcast – read aloud to a metronome, Israel named sole culprit
💻 Online – banners, newsletters & hashtags synced worldwide, midnight-to-midnight Image
Graphics kits were pre-made in 10 languages—EN, AR, HE, FR, DE, ES, PT, IT, JP, ZH—so every outlet pushed the same visuals. This isn’t organic coverage but a centrally directed, synchronized media assault involving the world’s biggest news brands. Image
The date chosen—Sept 1—marks 86 years since Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Coincidence? Or a calculated symbol to invert history, casting Israel as the new Nazis. This isn’t fringe activism—it’s major outlets, wires & institutions uniting in one coordinated message. Image
Everyone involved in this coordinated campaign — journalists, media organizations, investigative outlets, & press advocacy groups — has the resources & capacity to independently verify who is on the list they amplify. Yet they fail spectacularly at this basic responsibility Image
Lest take Abdallah Darwish, someone who was documented taking part of the October 7th Massacre. His presence among the terrorists who stormed into Israel, committing one of the worst atrocities in modern memory, is not speculation—it is documented Image
Even more brazen is that the current list, the so-called “Palestinian journalist” from Palestine Chronicle Abdallah Aljamal, who was revealed almost exactly one year ago to be a full Hamas member—and not just a member, but a man who kept three Israeli hostages locked in his home Image
Harrowing footage showed Palestinian cameramen filming the violent abduction of Yarden Bibas. While another journalist, Muthanna Al-Najjar, took part in the abduction Yarden’s wife Shiri, and his two baby boys Ariel and Kfir Bibas. Image
Image
72-yr-old Adina Mosh was abducted from Kibbutz Nir Oz. She was freed in Nov in a deal swapping ~100 hostages for jailed terrorists. Like Yarden, her kidnapping was filmed—terrorists had cameramen embedded to document the abduction. Image
One of the most obscene examples of complete journalistic malpractice by every media organization parroting headlines about “murdered journalists,” is the resurrected “journalists” is Mustafa Ayyad, who remains on Al Jazeera’s and CPJ’s list.
By counting terrorists as “journalists,” these orgs equate terrorists with reporters. Are journalists meant to command armed groups or hold captives? Wear a press vest, and atrocities don’t matter? A grotesque distortion of journalism itself.
Alarmingly, Reuters, AFP, and AP are part of this coordinated campaign. These global syndicators don’t just report—they set news cycles, amplifying a single narrative across thousands of outlets and reaching billions worldwide. Image
CPJ, led by Jodie Ginsberg, joins the campaign despite past findings: 50%+ of journalists on their lists were linked to Hamas or terrorists. ~13% worked for Al-Aqsa TV/Radio, Hamas’ official media. CPJ’s inclusion of these figures distorts journalism and legitimizes terrorists. Image
The hypocrisy is clear: journalists killed by Hamas or reporting independently are ignored. Instead, terrorists are framed as reporters. This isn’t press freedom advocacy—it’s a coordinated campaign of cognitive warfare
The hypocrisy. Piers Morgan, often vocal on Israel & press safety, stays silent on journalists killed by Hamas—and reportedly blocked Omar Abd Rabou, a journalist critical of Hamas. He amplifies the narrative while silencing truth. Image
The campaign paints Israel as "targeting" journos—but under Intl. law, journalists lose civilian protection if they directly participate in hostilities. A PRESS vest doesn’t grant immunity; true journalists face the same risks as any civilian Image
Claims of a total media ban in Gaza are propaganda. Campaigners demand unrestricted access—something no warzone allows. Experienced media heads know embedding rules, military coordination, and safety protocols are standard. Israel isn’t unique in access. Image
Many journalists have entered Gaza, following standard safety and coordination protocols. Claims of an “Israeli ban” are false—these orgs knowingly misrepresent facts to portray Israel as hostile to press freedom. Image
The true attack on press freedom is the coordinated campaign itself. RSF & Avaaz dictate newsrooms, turning reporting into pre-scripted messaging. When 150 outlets read the same script, independent journalism dies. This isn’t reporting—it’s cognitive warfare. Image
Avaaz, driving the coordinated campaign, is an international advocacy platform. It consistently backs anti-Israel narratives, including pushing Israeli officials to the ICC, and employs staff linked to NGOs associated with the PFLP. Image
Fadi Quran, senior Avaaz campaigner, is also an Al-Shabaka Policy Member & ex-UN officer with Al-Haq (tied to PFLP). He’s advocated turning protests into “resistance movements” & has been arrested multiple times (2011–2014) Image
Quran has openly supported terrorists and anti-Israel agitation online. He was active with SPER (precursor to SJP), Jewish Voice for Peace, and other radical groups, speaking on civil disobedience and even calling for a “Third Intifada” in 2011. Image
Avaaz has publicly advocated on behalf of prisoners involved in terrorism, protested Israel’s designation of several NGOs as terrorist organizations for their links to the PFLP, and is actively lobbying for Albanese to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Image
Avaaz lobbies governments & lawmakers, using petitions and media campaigns. In 2022, Australian Senator James McGrath stated Avaaz leads anti-Israel campaigns, especially BDS, vowing to pressure companies financing Israel’s occupation. Image
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) leads the coordinated campaign and engages in lawfare against Israel. RSF petitions the ICC & ICJ, portraying Palestinian journalists as “victims of Israeli war crimes,” despite many having documented ties to Hamas or other terrorist groups. Image
Example: Adel Al Zaanoun, AFP Gaza chief, had his home damaged by an IDF strike. His wife, also a journalist with RSF, left Gaza with four children and relatives of AFP reporters, evacuated to Qatar on an Egyptian military plane with RSF’s help. Image
Though RSF labels him a “victim,” Adel Al Zaanoun teaches media courses for Hamas’ Information Ministry and Press House Palestine, training future “journalists” alongside figures with terrorist ties—like Musab al-Buraim, spokesperson for Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Image
Image
Adel Al Zaanoun also directed the Doha Centre for Media Freedom (DCMF), founded by Qatar’s Emir. The center promoted press freedom but hosted Gaza trainings with instructors like Wael Dahdouh (Al Jazeera Gaza chief), from a clan tied to terrorism; his son Hamza was active in PIJ. Image
Many “journalists” from the Oct 7 attacks trained at these centers. Press House Palestine hosted Hamas leaders, trained operatives in media, and even provided safety gear and workspace after the attacks—including for those who invaded Israel. Image
Zaanoun is also nephew of Abu Al-Adib (Salim Al-Zaanoun), a Fatah leader. RSF’s lawfare uncritically labels such figures as “victims of Israeli targeting,” ignoring their ties to Hamas institutions, terrorism, and the broader context behind IDF operations. Image
The campaign seeks to pressure governments and intl bodies ahead of key UN votes on Palestinian state recognition and Israel’s UN participation. Flooding media with claims Israel “kills journalists” aims to manufacture consent and vilify Israel with recycled propaganda
Since Oct 7, media coverage shows patterns systematically vilifying Israel. A study analyzed 150 sources—Hamas/PA statements, NGO reports, media & digital campaigns—providing the first systematic look at orchestrate advocacy.
A Tablet study shows major media framed the Israel-Hamas war as “genocide” from Oct 19, 2023—just 12 days after Hamas killed 1,200+ & kidnapped 250. NYT used “Israel” + “genocide” 9x more than during Rwanda; The Guardian 6x. Propaganda from the start.
NCRI study reveals major US & European media amplified Hamas propaganda during the 2025 Gaza crisis. Misleading narratives spread via top outlets, Kremlin-linked media, Iranian networks, and conspiratorial actors. Image
Victims of Abdallah al-Jamal have sued The Palestine Chronicle, claiming Hamas coordinated with media to turn the world against Israel, Jews, & the US. Editor Ramzy Baroud sits on the board of Tawasol, a global network designed to coordinate media Image
Tawasol openly recruits journalists, provides training, syndicates content, & directs messaging with a unified narrative. With many board members tied to Hamas, media professionals & outlets function not as journalists but as parts of a coordinated machine Image
However, the leaked doc confirms this isn’t rogue reporting or bias—it’s a top-down operation. Editors-in-chief, CEOs, & directors themselves orchestrated the campaign, showing it’s a deliberate, centralized effort by global media leadership, not a spontaneous initiative. Image
Unshockingly, even Israeli media and organizations joined the coordinated cognitive war against Israel: Haaretz, +972 Magazine, Foreign Press Association, 7amleh, The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media, and Sikha Mekomit all participated. Image
Media is scripted on what to say, how, and when. Editorial independence is replaced by NGO messaging. When 150 outlets in 50 countries publish the same line simultaneously, it’s not journalism. How many other campaigns, over how many years?

Full Post: globaldisconnect.substack.com/p/protect-jour…Image
Don't forget Follow, Share & Like this post

Subscribe to my substack for more: 🔗 globaldisconnect.substack.com/?r=1g37ub&utm_…Image
@moghaoui Is not about quantity, it is about quality

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Leslie Kajomovitz

Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kikas6652

Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Jan 31
🧵Every few years, Europe "rediscovers" the same idea: two-speed Europe, multi-speed Europe, variable geometry. The terminology changes, but the premise remains the same — some EU states should integrate deeper and faster, while others are pushed to "second class" States. Image
Two-speed Europe” is the idea that the EU should formally accept unequal integration. A core group would advance deeper integration, while others are left out—bound by Brussels’ rules but excluded from decision-making. Sold as flexibility, turns an informal imbalance into a permanent hierarchyImage
What’s new isn’t the idea, but the confidence behind it. Germany has revived it openly, France backs it, others quietly agree. Sold as realism, it dodges the truth: the problem isn’t tiers, it’s the EU itself. Multi-speed Europe isn’t reform—it’s an admission of failure. Image
Read 7 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Jan 21
🧵Almost no one is asking the most important question about Trump’s “Board of Peace”: Is it even constitutional? Here’s why Trump’s “Board of Peace” raises serious constitutional issues that no one is talking about. Image
“Minilateralism,” Non-Binding Commitments, and Why Labels Do Not End the Treaty Inquiry

Some describe the Board as a form of executive “minilateralism,” akin to informal contact groups created without Senate ratification.

The problem, U.S. constitutional law turns on substance, not labels. The Charter does not describe a temporary forum; it creates an enduring institution with legal personality—meaning the capacity to act as an independent legal entity under international law.

Legal personality is decisive because it transforms a diplomatic gathering into a standing organization capable of: Owning property, Entering contracts, Suing and being sued, Acting independently of its member states

Under U.S. law, such status cannot be self-declared. It requires either congressional authorization or designation under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA). The Board satisfies neither. As a result, its claimed legal personality has no domestic legal grounding, even as the United States becomes politically and institutionally bound by creating, staffing, and chairing it.

“Non-binding” does not mean constitutionally irrelevant. As Medellín v. Texas makes clear, obligations may be non-self-executing in U.S. courts yet still bind the United States politically and diplomatically.

Expiration clauses do not cure this problem when renewal authority rests solely with the Chairman, enabling conditional perpetuity outside democratic oversight.Image
Immunities, Domestic Law, and the Limits of Executive Authority

The Charter goes further by asserting that the Board itself shall “ensure” privileges and immunities through agreements negotiated by its own officials. While defenders argue this merely contemplates host-state agreements subject to domestic law, the post explains that this misunderstands how immunity works in the United States.

Under U.S. law, immunity is derivative, not inherent. It can arise only through: Congressional authorization (via statute or treaty), or Presidential designation under the IOIA, which itself presupposes lawful U.S. participation

An organization created unilaterally by the President cannot bootstrap itself into immunity. Executive agreements cannot displace Congress’s control over jurisdiction, courts, liability, or regulatory enforcement. Even if no immunity is ultimately granted, the constitutional problem arises from constructing a framework that treats immunity as an expected institutional attribute, negotiated by executive authority and potentially administered by a self-perpetuating Chairman.

Invocations of UN practice or Security Council resolutions do not resolve this. UN immunities in the U.S. exist because Congress enacted implementing statutes. International endorsement cannot override domestic separation of powers.Image
Read 14 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 26, 2025
🧵Thanksgiving wasn’t born in a peaceful colonial feast—it was created by Lincoln in 1863 as a wartime ritual to hold a fractured nation together. Today’s polarized America faces its own internal divide and foreign adversaries eager to exploit it. The holiday’s lesson is clear: unity is national security and the only way to save a divided nation.Image
The myth most people imagine Thanksgiving as a colonial harvest ritual. But the holiday we celebrate today—this national pause for unity—was invented during the Civil War. Yes, Plymouth had a 1621 meal, but it wasn’t called Thanksgiving, wasn’t a tradition and it wasn't repeated.Image
The first real national Thanksgiving was proclaimed on November 26, 1863, in the middle of the Civil War. Lincoln issued it four months after Gettysburg, as the Union was still burying its dead. Thanksgiving wasn’t born from abundance. It was born from national desperation. Image
Read 11 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 20, 2025
🧵Israel is passing a new law to “cut water & electricity” to UNRWA. This amendment enforces the 2024 law banning UNRWA from operating in East Jerusalem, clarifying that utilities to its offices—which the agency refuses to close—count as prohibited contact. Image
If you read the headlines about the Knesset voting to cut water and electricity to UNRWA, you would think Israel suddenly woke up one morning and passed new “draconian” legislation targeting the UN agency. In reality, that narrative is not just misleading—it is factually wrong. Image
This isn’t about cutting water or electricity to homes or refugee camps—those aren’t supplied by Israeli companies. The amendment targets UNRWA’s East Jerusalem offices, which the agency refused to vacate. It simply enforces the law. Image
Read 6 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 18, 2025
🧵Trump selling the F-3, the world’s most advanced stealth fighter to a regime that doesn’t even recognizes Israel’s existence is not only reckless, it’s potentially illegal. U.S. law requires any defense sale to the Middle East preserves Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge. (QME) Image
Since 2008, U.S. law has required presidents to ensure Israel keeps a clear military edge. Under the Arms Export Control Act, any Middle East arms sale must be certified as not harming Israel’s QME—a mandate reaffirmed in later defense laws. It isn’t custom. It’s statutory. Image
Even downgraded export F-35s alters the balance. QME law requires that no sale diminish Israel’s edge—and stealth can’t be partially exported. Once Saudi Arabia has the F-35, the gap collapses. Israel’s superiority is gone—precisely what the law forbids.
Read 7 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 18, 2025
🧵Many believe only Security Council resolutions “under Chapter VII” are binding. That’s a myth. The UN Charter makes clear that legal force comes from the Council’s authority and the resolutions' operative language—not from magic words. Image
Article 25 of the Charter, obligates UN members to carry out Security Council decisions. Chapter VII adds enforcement tools like sanctions or force, but doesn’t limit the resolution's binding authority. Image
Operative verbs determine whether a UN Security Council resolution is binding: “Decides” & “Demands” bind states; “Calls upon,” “Urges,” “Recommends,” & “Welcomes” do not. Binding force comes from wording, not Chapter VII. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(