đź§µEXPOSED: A leaked document reveals that Reporters without Borders & Avaaz have secured the participation of around 150 media outlets from some 50 countries, alongside journalists and press freedom organisations, instructing them to publish the same message, on the same day
The leaked doc instructs to post on the same day, same hashtags, same message. Black front pages, scripted TV, coordinated feeds. T
Their unified script?
“At the rate journalists are being killed in Gaza by the Israeli army, there will soon be no one left to keep you informed.”
Leaked doc show outlets were given strict instructions:
📰 Print – blacked-out front pages with one message
📺 Broadcast – read aloud to a metronome, Israel named sole culprit
💻 Online – banners, newsletters & hashtags synced worldwide, midnight-to-midnight
Graphics kits were pre-made in 10 languages—EN, AR, HE, FR, DE, ES, PT, IT, JP, ZH—so every outlet pushed the same visuals. This isn’t organic coverage but a centrally directed, synchronized media assault involving the world’s biggest news brands.
The date chosen—Sept 1—marks 86 years since Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Coincidence? Or a calculated symbol to invert history, casting Israel as the new Nazis. This isn’t fringe activism—it’s major outlets, wires & institutions uniting in one coordinated message.
Everyone involved in this coordinated campaign — journalists, media organizations, investigative outlets, & press advocacy groups — has the resources & capacity to independently verify who is on the list they amplify. Yet they fail spectacularly at this basic responsibility
Lest take Abdallah Darwish, someone who was documented taking part of the October 7th Massacre. His presence among the terrorists who stormed into Israel, committing one of the worst atrocities in modern memory, is not speculation—it is documented
Even more brazen is that the current list, the so-called “Palestinian journalist” from Palestine Chronicle Abdallah Aljamal, who was revealed almost exactly one year ago to be a full Hamas member—and not just a member, but a man who kept three Israeli hostages locked in his home
Harrowing footage showed Palestinian cameramen filming the violent abduction of Yarden Bibas. While another journalist, Muthanna Al-Najjar, took part in the abduction Yarden’s wife Shiri, and his two baby boys Ariel and Kfir Bibas.
72-yr-old Adina Mosh was abducted from Kibbutz Nir Oz. She was freed in Nov in a deal swapping ~100 hostages for jailed terrorists. Like Yarden, her kidnapping was filmed—terrorists had cameramen embedded to document the abduction.
One of the most obscene examples of complete journalistic malpractice by every media organization parroting headlines about “murdered journalists,” is the resurrected “journalists” is Mustafa Ayyad, who remains on Al Jazeera’s and CPJ’s list.
By counting terrorists as “journalists,” these orgs equate terrorists with reporters. Are journalists meant to command armed groups or hold captives? Wear a press vest, and atrocities don’t matter? A grotesque distortion of journalism itself.
Alarmingly, Reuters, AFP, and AP are part of this coordinated campaign. These global syndicators don’t just report—they set news cycles, amplifying a single narrative across thousands of outlets and reaching billions worldwide.
CPJ, led by Jodie Ginsberg, joins the campaign despite past findings: 50%+ of journalists on their lists were linked to Hamas or terrorists. ~13% worked for Al-Aqsa TV/Radio, Hamas’ official media. CPJ’s inclusion of these figures distorts journalism and legitimizes terrorists.
The hypocrisy is clear: journalists killed by Hamas or reporting independently are ignored. Instead, terrorists are framed as reporters. This isn’t press freedom advocacy—it’s a coordinated campaign of cognitive warfare
The hypocrisy. Piers Morgan, often vocal on Israel & press safety, stays silent on journalists killed by Hamas—and reportedly blocked Omar Abd Rabou, a journalist critical of Hamas. He amplifies the narrative while silencing truth.
The campaign paints Israel as "targeting" journos—but under Intl. law, journalists lose civilian protection if they directly participate in hostilities. A PRESS vest doesn’t grant immunity; true journalists face the same risks as any civilian
Claims of a total media ban in Gaza are propaganda. Campaigners demand unrestricted access—something no warzone allows. Experienced media heads know embedding rules, military coordination, and safety protocols are standard. Israel isn’t unique in access.
Many journalists have entered Gaza, following standard safety and coordination protocols. Claims of an “Israeli ban” are false—these orgs knowingly misrepresent facts to portray Israel as hostile to press freedom.
The true attack on press freedom is the coordinated campaign itself. RSF & Avaaz dictate newsrooms, turning reporting into pre-scripted messaging. When 150 outlets read the same script, independent journalism dies. This isn’t reporting—it’s cognitive warfare.
Avaaz, driving the coordinated campaign, is an international advocacy platform. It consistently backs anti-Israel narratives, including pushing Israeli officials to the ICC, and employs staff linked to NGOs associated with the PFLP.
Fadi Quran, senior Avaaz campaigner, is also an Al-Shabaka Policy Member & ex-UN officer with Al-Haq (tied to PFLP). He’s advocated turning protests into “resistance movements” & has been arrested multiple times (2011–2014)
Quran has openly supported terrorists and anti-Israel agitation online. He was active with SPER (precursor to SJP), Jewish Voice for Peace, and other radical groups, speaking on civil disobedience and even calling for a “Third Intifada” in 2011.
Avaaz has publicly advocated on behalf of prisoners involved in terrorism, protested Israel’s designation of several NGOs as terrorist organizations for their links to the PFLP, and is actively lobbying for Albanese to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.
Avaaz lobbies governments & lawmakers, using petitions and media campaigns. In 2022, Australian Senator James McGrath stated Avaaz leads anti-Israel campaigns, especially BDS, vowing to pressure companies financing Israel’s occupation.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) leads the coordinated campaign and engages in lawfare against Israel. RSF petitions the ICC & ICJ, portraying Palestinian journalists as “victims of Israeli war crimes,” despite many having documented ties to Hamas or other terrorist groups.
Example: Adel Al Zaanoun, AFP Gaza chief, had his home damaged by an IDF strike. His wife, also a journalist with RSF, left Gaza with four children and relatives of AFP reporters, evacuated to Qatar on an Egyptian military plane with RSF’s help.
Though RSF labels him a “victim,” Adel Al Zaanoun teaches media courses for Hamas’ Information Ministry and Press House Palestine, training future “journalists” alongside figures with terrorist ties—like Musab al-Buraim, spokesperson for Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Adel Al Zaanoun also directed the Doha Centre for Media Freedom (DCMF), founded by Qatar’s Emir. The center promoted press freedom but hosted Gaza trainings with instructors like Wael Dahdouh (Al Jazeera Gaza chief), from a clan tied to terrorism; his son Hamza was active in PIJ.
Many “journalists” from the Oct 7 attacks trained at these centers. Press House Palestine hosted Hamas leaders, trained operatives in media, and even provided safety gear and workspace after the attacks—including for those who invaded Israel.
Zaanoun is also nephew of Abu Al-Adib (Salim Al-Zaanoun), a Fatah leader. RSF’s lawfare uncritically labels such figures as “victims of Israeli targeting,” ignoring their ties to Hamas institutions, terrorism, and the broader context behind IDF operations.
The campaign seeks to pressure governments and intl bodies ahead of key UN votes on Palestinian state recognition and Israel’s UN participation. Flooding media with claims Israel “kills journalists” aims to manufacture consent and vilify Israel with recycled propaganda
Since Oct 7, media coverage shows patterns systematically vilifying Israel. A study analyzed 150 sources—Hamas/PA statements, NGO reports, media & digital campaigns—providing the first systematic look at orchestrate advocacy.
A Tablet study shows major media framed the Israel-Hamas war as “genocide” from Oct 19, 2023—just 12 days after Hamas killed 1,200+ & kidnapped 250. NYT used “Israel” + “genocide” 9x more than during Rwanda; The Guardian 6x. Propaganda from the start.
NCRI study reveals major US & European media amplified Hamas propaganda during the 2025 Gaza crisis. Misleading narratives spread via top outlets, Kremlin-linked media, Iranian networks, and conspiratorial actors.
Victims of Abdallah al-Jamal have sued The Palestine Chronicle, claiming Hamas coordinated with media to turn the world against Israel, Jews, & the US. Editor Ramzy Baroud sits on the board of Tawasol, a global network designed to coordinate media
Tawasol openly recruits journalists, provides training, syndicates content, & directs messaging with a unified narrative. With many board members tied to Hamas, media professionals & outlets function not as journalists but as parts of a coordinated machine
However, the leaked doc confirms this isn’t rogue reporting or bias—it’s a top-down operation. Editors-in-chief, CEOs, & directors themselves orchestrated the campaign, showing it’s a deliberate, centralized effort by global media leadership, not a spontaneous initiative.
Unshockingly, even Israeli media and organizations joined the coordinated cognitive war against Israel: Haaretz, +972 Magazine, Foreign Press Association, 7amleh, The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media, and Sikha Mekomit all participated.
Media is scripted on what to say, how, and when. Editorial independence is replaced by NGO messaging. When 150 outlets in 50 countries publish the same line simultaneously, it’s not journalism. How many other campaigns, over how many years?
🧵For decades UN/NGOs relied on what @NGOmonitor calls the “Halo Effect”—their reports accepted as gospel. Now, when flaws are exposed, they demand we ignore definitions, evidence & contradictions.
Never question the UN or big NGOs is the unspoken rule. The “Halo Effect,” the aura of credibility surrounding these organizations—means that their findings were virtually immune to fact-checking and often amplified by the media.
Oct 7 shattered the old rule of blind trust. Now journalists, researchers, technologists & citizens are dissecting UN/NGO claims with open-source data. The “Halo Effect” is cracking—exposing who wrote the reports, how data is twisted, what was ignored, & the agendas behind it.
🧵The UN’s Gaza “famine” claim isn’t science—it’s politics. The IPC’s own authors bent rules, cherry-picked data, ignored food imports, and limited famine to a 17 sq mile Gaza pocket. The Gaza famine declaration wasn’t just bad science — it was written by activists.
Let's start from what the headlines missed. The UN declared “famine” ONLY in GAZA CITY—17 sq miles—not all of Gaza. If famine at that scale truly existed, people could easily walk a few miles. Essentially the UN declared, there is famine in the living room, not in the kitchen”
The IPC didn’t lower the famine threshold as first reported—but it used a less reliable metric, MUAC, ignoring the rules for its use. MUAC requires multiple confirming indicators; here, the declaration rested on a single, flawed measure. But that's not all
🧵 @RepMTG used @megynkelly & @MegynKellyShow to spread lies: Israel-US aid, AIPAC a “foreign agent,” flag rulings misrepresented, Gaza “starvation” false, trips distorted. I respect Megyn as a journalist—she asks tough questions, but her platform was used to spread lies.
The myth: MTG claims US gives Israel a “blank check” of $3.8B/yr to freely fund weapons. False. Aid isn’t charity—it’s strategic: designed to strengthen Israel while preventing it from competing w/ US defense exports.
Unlike Jordan, Egypt & Lebanon, which get cash grants, Israel’s aid is mostly credit to buy US-made weapons. A small portion funds joint R&D, but patents remain US-owned. Israel can innovate in drones & missile defense, but must shelve projects that compete w/ US exports.
đź§µAid worker in Gaza filed a whistleblower complaint to the Inspector General of USAID, alleging "gross misconduct and misuse of humanitarian funds by the World Food Programme and other U.N. Agencies," according to a copy of the complaint obtained by Fox News Digital.
According to the complaint, senior IDF officials offered “any support necessary, including security protection and coordination” to WFP and OCHA. The response? A flat refusal to discuss coordination.
The whistleblower says: “This raises serious questions as to why WFP and OCHA were unprepared to discuss or accept the assistance offered by the IDF, thereby preventing aid from getting to the people of Gaza.”
đź§µUS watchdog SIGAR finds nearly $11 Billion in Afghan aid siphoned, corrupted & weaponized by the Taliban since 2021. It exposes how NGOs & the UN pay bribes, hire Taliban-linked businesses & divert funds as a chronic problem & more.
SIGAR finds US-funded Afghan aid largely fails to reach people—only 30–40% after taxes, fees, bribery & extortion. $10.9M+ went to Taliban-controlled entities in 2024 audit. Aid system is costly, complex, multi-layered, and riddled with corruption, creating new diversion points.
Under Taliban rule, they control which NGOs operate, force partnerships with Taliban-linked entities, manipulate currency for profit, extort aid workers, & impose taxes..
🧵On 7/29, the IPC said a “worst-case famine” was hitting Gaza, @Kredo0 from @FreeBeacon exposes how it did so by changing what famine actually means. This change applied only in Gaza to fit a political agenda. This isn’t science, it’s politics
Traditionally, IPC declares famine when 30% of kids show acute malnutrition by weight-for-height—a precise, global standard. The July Gaza report changed that for less accurate mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), cut the threshold to 15%, & dropped other usual criteria.
MUAC is a quick emergencies screening tool—not a replacement for full surveys in official famine declarations. Even IPC’s manual says MUAC isn’t a primary famine indicator. Yet for Gaza, IPC used MUAC data to claim famine in 3 cities, two with under 8% malnutrition