Post

DD Geopolitics

Aug 31, 2025 • 12 tweets • 10 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

🇵🇸💸 Welcome to “The GREAT Trust” — Gaza’s future as imagined by U.S. planners, Israeli strategists, and Gulf investors. A corporate utopia, built on ruins and wrapped in Abraham Accords buzzwords. But under the branding lies a brutal truth: Gaza is to be recolonized, monetized, and erased.

This is not a reconstruction plan. This is a capitalist cleansing operation.

A leaked document titled “The GREAT Trust”—short for Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation—lays out the blueprint. It envisions Gaza as a “thriving trade hub” at the heart of the new Abrahamic regional order. But that vision only begins after Gaza is destroyed, Hamas is dismantled, and U.S. control is imposed through a “multilateral trusteeship.”

This is how they describe it:

“A U.S.-led custodianship… can start as a U.S.–Israel bilateral agreement taking control from Israel to the U.S. (once Hamas is disarmed), and evolve into a formal multilateral trusteeship.”

The real goal? Transfer Gaza from Israeli occupation to U.S.-Arab corporate control.

📉 Gaza’s value under Hamas is described as “$0.” The West Bank, they note approvingly, has “modest growth” under Israeli control. The conclusion? Hamas must be dismantled, Gaza must be opened to foreign capital, and “voluntary relocation” must begin.

📈 What follows is a $70–100B investment scheme to kickstart tokenized land ownership, 10 “mega construction” projects, a “top-tier security force,” and massive returns for U.S.-aligned investors:
$385B projected ROI over 10 years
$324B in asset value
$37B in tax revenue (for foreign countries)
$24B in direct revenue
Annual trust income exceeding $4.5B by Year 10

Gaza, they claim, will become a “$300B asset” up from “zero.” A digital-physical economic zone at the center of the IMEC corridor, exporting labor and goods through tokenized land and tightly controlled trade routes.

But this wealth will not belong to Palestinians.

The plan mentions “generous voluntary relocation packages” and “permanent housing,” but offers no political autonomy, no elections, no justice. Just corporate trusteeship, strategic mineral access, and a chance to erase Gaza’s revolutionary spirit forever.

🧵This is the vision. This is The GREAT Trust.
A capitalist dystopia over the bones of children.

2. The plan to “rebuild Gaza” is a corporate-military annexation wrapped in buzzwords like resilience, integration, and smart cities.

By 2035, Gaza is envisioned not as a Palestinian homeland but as:
• A bridge between India and Europe for the IMEC trade route
• A rare-earth processing hub feeding Gulf tech and Israeli defense
• A walled free-trade zone ruled by digital ID and AI systems

The U.S. and Israel would direct a 10-part mega-project campaign:
1. UXO/demolition clearing
2. “Abraham Gateway” logistics node in Rafah
3. UAE/KSA-funded railways, ports, and pipelines
4. An “Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone” for EVs
5. U.S. datacenters governed by AI laws
6. A Trump-branded island resort
7. Smart ID-governed cities designed for surveillance
8. Israeli-border industry zones powered by Gaza’s own gas
9. A regional water hub (Sinai-based desalination)
10. A highway grid to link all of it to Israel, Jordan, Egypt, and the Gulf

Like Haussmann’s redesign of Paris to crush rebellion, Gaza’s new layout is engineered to prevent uprisings before they begin.

All economy, services, and movement would run through AI-managed ID systems. The cities are shaped like pie slices, surrounded by golf courses and tourist zones, with trams, highways, and surveillance nodes connecting every edge.

This is late-stage capitalism on meth and ketamine....

3. The core of the “GREAT Trust” plan is this: Gaza is not to be rebuilt for Palestinians but for investors.

At its heart is a $300B+ Land Trust, funded by turning Gaza’s land into digital tokens, tradable on a blockchain, managed like a corporate asset:
• Public land (~30%) leased for up to 99 years
• Private landowners offered “permanent housing” in exchange for digital tokens
• All transactions tracked via smart contracts
• Land aggregated, securitized, and sold — piece by piece

This is disaster capitalism on the bones of a genocide:
1. Tokenize the rubble.
2. Sell off the land.
3. Use the proceeds to fund a surveillance dystopia and call it “Palestinian Wealth.”

Governance? Not democratic, but custodial:
• Phase 1: Israeli-led “humanitarian zones” (no Hamas)
• Phase 2: A multilateral Trust governed by U.S. and “friendly” Arab states
• Phase 3: A deradicalized “Palestinian polity” takes over…but only if it signs the Abraham Accords.

Security? It begins with Western PMCs, transitions to Trust-trained Gazans, but always under permanent Israeli “oversight rights.”

This is worse than occupation, monetized, digitized, and whitewashed through humanitarian theater.

And in the end, it forces Palestine into a Zionist normalization pact as the price of survival.

4. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) calls itself neutral. It is not. It is the logistical arm of a militarized, investor-led occupation, designed to control aid, manage population flows, and pave the way for a for-profit reconstruction model — all while claiming apolitical “humanitarianism.”

Let’s break it down.

The Business Model: GHF’s reconstruction plan involves $133B in investments that are expected to generate $185B in revenue over ten years largely by privatizing Gaza’s core infrastructure:
• Housing
• Security
• Broadband
• Education
• Medical services
• Data centers and manufacturing hubs
• Even debris removal

This is an asset extraction scheme. Gaza becomes a closed-loop contractor economy, where every bombed building and displaced family becomes an investment opportunity.

🚧 Controlled Aid, Militarized Zones (Concentration Camps)
GHF proposes a “Safe Distribution System” (SDS), not for all Gazans, but for carefully screened recipients routed through military-grade checkpoints.
• Aid convoys operate only on IDF-cleared roads
• “Safe Zones” are surrounded by Israeli and private security
• Aid delivery is designed to bypass Hamas and local civil society
• All activity occurs under surveillance and armed oversight

Voluntary Relocation = Ethnic Cleansing
The plan’s most disturbing section outlines a “Voluntary Relocation Program.” It assumes that 25% of Gaza’s population will leave the Strip, and that 75% of those will never return.

Here’s the math:
• $5,000 payout per person
• Rent and food subsidized for 1–4 years
• ~$500M saved for every 1% of the population relocated
• Estimated total savings = billions

GHF frames this as choice. But in a decimated homeland, with no guarantee of safety or rights, it’s not choice.
It’s financially incentivized expulsion.

The final goal?
To increase the land value of Gaza from $0 to $324B.
To create a digitally tokenized, foreign-managed microstate stripped of resistance and filled with profitable security contracts.

The GHF is not a relief group.
It is an evangelical corporate intermediary for regime change, spatial cleansing, and wealth extraction.

5. The Vision for Gaza 2035 is not just colonial, it’s profitable. By year 10, they expect the Strip to yield $320 billion in “asset value” across housing, ports, rail, and data centers. Here’s how they plan to do it and who benefits.

The Core Mechanism: Public-Private Enclosure
The GREAT Trust, a pseudo-sovereign entity backed by donors and Gulf investors, will own 30–40% of Gaza’s land and expects over $4.5 billion in annual revenue by year 10. The rest will be carved up by “private partners” in a sweeping PPP model (Public-Private Partnership).

Asset Breakdown | Here’s what they plan to monetize:
Housing: $35.3B in investment to build homes for ~2.1 million Gazans. Each home is pegged at ~$200K value, a tenth the cost of Tel Aviv real estate.
Ports & Rail: $3B in transport corridors connecting Gaza to the IMEC corridor, with another $1.3–1.9B deep-water port linking to India.
Data Centers: $500M–$1.5B in hyperscale infrastructure for cloud and surveillance operations, expected to generate up to $700M/year.
Tourism & Manufacturing: 30–40 luxury hotels, “Gigafactory”-scale industrial zones, and broadband infrastructure intended to lure tech investment and reshape Gaza as a logistics and finance hub.

🚨 Profit Hinges on Depopulation
To cut costs and raise per capita wealth, the Trust openly admits its investment is cheaper when more Gazans leave:

“Increase the number of Gazans who volunteer to leave Gaza during the reconstruction.”

Every 1% reduction in Gaza’s population lowers expenses by hundreds of millions. They plan for 90K families (500K people) to “relocate permanently,” with a $55K buyout per family — and no guarantee of return.

Debt, Collateral, and Extraction:
Public land will be used as collateral to secure loans. Aid is not a gift, it’s a mortgage. Gaza’s future is a financial instrument:
Loans secured by confiscated or depopulated land
Foreign aid used to subsidize private profit
Construction timelines expedited to move quickly from crisis to cash flow

This is not about rebuilding Gaza. It’s about flipping it like one of those shows on DIY network.

6. Gaza is being refashioned into a privatized dystopia where foreign corporations extract value, public land becomes collateral, and expulsion of Palestinians is an economic strategy, not a side effect.

🏨 Private Industry Targets (Non-PPP) | The plan encourages direct investment from multinationals outside of the public-private trust structure:
- $2.7B for luxury tourism, hotels, and resort districts
- $1B for hyperscale data centers for surveillance and cloud services
- $12B for “advanced manufacturing” i.e., sweatshop-scale gigafactories

🚨 Featured firms: Tesla, AWS, TSMC, IHG, and Mandarin Oriental are all suggested as model investors.

📉 “Levers” to Reduce Investment Risk | Lists five ways to reduce their own financial burden and all of them come at the expense of Palestinians:
- Increase voluntary displacement.More Gazans leaving means fewer services and homes to build.
- Use more PPPs. Privatize sectors like medical care and broadband to shift costs to corporations.
- Collateralize land.Public land can be used to take on debt and fund construction turning Gaza into a speculative asset.
- Use humanitarian aid as subsidy. “Donations” of medical supplies and shelters let corporations profit without paying full costs.

Accelerate construction. Speed is key: less time in temporary housing = more savings + faster revenue.

Underlying Assumptions:
- 25% of Gazans will “choose” to leave
- Of those, 75% will not return
- Remaining 75% are locked into this system with their land either privatized, mortgaged, or fenced off

A forced exit strategy + economic enclosure, wrapped in a tech-utopian fantasy, funded by aid, and pitched to Western investors as a once-in-a-generation real estate opportunity.

7. Gaza is being rebuilt not for Gazans but for profit.

These financial projections from the GREAT Trust show:
💰 $97B in total reconstruction investment
💰 $36B from private industry, not humanitarian actors
💰 $24B in profit for the GREAT Trust within the first decade
💰 And $4.7B in “economic benefits” to foreign countries that agree to host displaced Gazans

The math only works if Palestinians leave and don’t come back.

8. This is a business plan on a graveyard.

The Gaza 2035 vision anticipates:
💰 $185B in corporate revenue
💰 $37B in tax revenue for donor states
💰 10x GDP growth, with a projected valuation of $324B
💰 Massive security spending to enforce it all

Western PMCs (private military contractors) will be hired to “secure” Gaza while Gazans themselves are surveilled, displaced, and rebuilt into a controlled labor force.

9. The Gaza 2035 blueprint ends with the punchline: $320 billion in “asset value.”

Each piece of the occupation is commodified:
- Palestinians who stay = real estate
- Palestinians who leave = relocation subsidies + labor for host countries
- Hospitals = profit centers
- Broadband, rail, ports = privatized infrastructure
- Gaza = a node in IMEC’s global trade spine

Even the dead and displaced are converted into ROI projections.

It’s colonization with a financial model.

https://x.com/shaykhsulaiman/status/1961145324795494635?s=46

Looks like there was a partial leak a few days ago....

https://x.com/shaykhsulaiman/status/1961145324795494635?s=46

https://x.com/dd_geopolitics/status/1938400186155602371?s=46

Further read for more insight:

https://x.com/dd_geopolitics/status/1938400186155602371?s=46

Here is a PDF of the plan if you'd like your own file: acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @DD_Geopolitics

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Jan 9

🇦🇷🇮🇱 Argentina, Wildfires, and the Return of Plan Andinia

Argentina is burning.

Massive wildfires are tearing through Patagonia, displacing communities and destroying protected land. As the fires spread, local residents have begun reporting something unsettling: foreign individuals caught allegedly setting fires, with multiple reports pointing to Israelis.

Authorities say investigations are ongoing.

Patagonia is not just wilderness, it is one of the most resource-rich, sparsely populated regions on Earth:
• Freshwater reserves
• Fertile land
• Strategic geography
• Low population density

It is also a region that has long attracted foreign interest, legal and otherwise. This brings up a term many Argentines know well: Plan Andinia.

Plan Andinia refers to a mid-20th-century geopolitical concept, discussed in Argentine military and intelligence circles, proposing the establishment of a Jewish state or autonomous zone in Patagonia under certain conditions.

Whether speculative or strategic, it was real enough to be studied, debated, and feared. Plan Andinia was never implemented. But ideas do not need to be implemented to shape behavior. They need only to justify long-term positioning.

Land acquisition, NGO influence, tourism corridors, dual citizenship flows, security cooperation these are far more common tools than tanks.

Argentina’s south has seen:
• Large-scale foreign land purchases
• Restricted-access estates
• Private conservation zones with opaque governance
• Foreign security personnel operating under civilian cover

Wildfires introduce a new variable that Israelis will love.... forced displacement. Throughout history, environmental destruction has often preceded land reorganization.

Not because fires prove intent but because chaos creates opportunity:
• Emergency powers
• Property transfers
• International “assistance”
• Reframing of sovereignty as “management”

There are credible reports of Israelis caught setting fires on the hiking trails of Patagonia. In 2011, an Israeli was caught setting a fire that burned 17,000 acres of Chilean Patagonia.

When communities feel their land is being taken, reshaped, or destabilized without consent, they remember history.

Argentina has its own history with foreign interference, IMF restructuring, and externally imposed “solutions.” In that context, Patagonia is not peripheral.
It is strategic. And Plan Andinia persists not as a plan, but as a symbol of vulnerability.

Wildfires should unite a country in defense of its land, not silence discussion.

History doesn’t repeat verbatim but it rhymes, especially when land is burning.

And everything is a conspiracy.... until it isn't....

"South America is being prepared to be occupied. Our continent must say a resounding 'No!'"

In it's June 18,2025 edition, Diario UNO, a regional Argentine newspaper, published this OpEd by Sister Milagros Juárez. In it she writes:

Plan Andinia

Until years ago, it was said that the "Andinia Plan" was a crazy, anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. But after events promoted by Milei, it is clear that it was not fiction, but a reality that endangers South America, since it would leave us, the neighboring countries, in the future in the situation of Iran or Syria, an imminent war zone, after the creation of a "new Israel" in Patagonia

The very old Andinia Plan essentially maintains that, prior to the creation of the Zionist and illegitimate state of Israel in the Middle East, the other option for the UN to send them as refugees after WWII was Argentina, but that area, where occupied Palestine is today, won. But Argentina remained as a second option to establish a Jewish state if something went wrong in Palestine. Do you connect the dots?

Following the assumption of the presidency of Javier Milei, a convert to Judaism, in accordance with the Andinia Plan, there was a massive acquisition of land in Patagonia by Israeli businessmen at rock-bottom prices, as well as various undervalued resources and direct flights from Tel Aviv. These flights, however, could not (for now) touch an area that the Malvinas veterans had saved through legal means.

The final straw came last Friday, when, just hours before Israel attacked Iran, Milei posed with Netanyahu. Bilateral agreements also came into effect so that Jews who move to Argentina can have their social assistance and insurance benefits recognized. Why, hours before the attack, did Milei put the finishing touches on what appears to be a mass exodus, should Israel eventually lose a war against Iran?

South America is being prepared to be occupied. Our continent must say a resounding "No!" We are Christians, we speak Spanish, we must not receive any kind of exodus from another continent. We have not yet recovered from the Venezuelan exodus.

I ask the Heavenly Father to give the indigenous leaders of South America and all the people the strength not to let ourselves be invaded like Palestine. We saw the fate that befell them for being trusting. We have families to protect, an ancient heritage that must not disappear, because Zionism destroys everything it touches. I leave this in the name of Jesus Christ, amen

The Andinia Plan is a Jewish initiative to dismember Patagonia from Argentina and Chile and create another Jewish state there. This theory, which is relatively recent, is based on the idea proposed by Theodor Herzl (1882) in his book The Jewish State (Der Judenstaat). He discussed the possibility of buying land either in Palestine or in Argentina for the creation of a Jewish State. The plan saw light at the International Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897.

It is believed that the creation of this new Jewish State in Patagonian territory would be carried out thanks to the same methods used for the creation of the State of Israel in Palestine.

The beginning of this story dates back to 1882, when the Andinia Plan was formulated and launched in 1887 on the occasion of the World Jewish Congress in Basel, where the proposals of Leon Pinsker (Self-emancipation) and Teodoro Herzl (The Jewish State) were approved.

To create a Jewish state in America, preferably in Argentina, the following actions were undertaken:

1. Mass immigration of Jews to Argentina.
2. Purchase of large tracts of land by the Jewish Company Association Colonization, with center in London
3. Constitution of large public limited companies, such as Bemberg, Dreyfus, Dunge and Born, etc., which currently own large extensions.

Read 8 tweets

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Jan 1

🧵 THREAD: Trump’s Web of Power, Profit & Policy

The NYT published a map of Donald Trump’s second-term business universe including crypto ventures, foreign governments, real estate deals, defense and A.I. interests, all orbiting the presidency.

Unlike his first term, Trump re-entered the White House without agreeing to halt new international business deals. Since then, his family and closest allies have accelerated projects that monetize the Trump name while intersecting directly with U.S. policy decisions.

We’ll walk through this map piece by piece:
• how crypto became the family’s most lucrative venture
• how foreign governments gained unprecedented access
• how policy rollbacks align with private profit
• and how American norms around conflicts of interest collapsed in real time

This diagram captures a single thread in a much larger web, but it’s one of the most revealing.

Just weeks before his second inauguration, Donald Trump and his partners launched a memecoin, $TRUMP, reversing years of public skepticism toward crypto. Trump personally promoted the coin, driving retail investors into the market.

As investors bought $TRUMP, trading fees were routed through a series of Trump-linked entities, including Fight Fight Fight and CIC Digital, before ultimately benefiting a trust tied to Trump himself. Every transaction generated revenue upstream, regardless of whether investors won or lost.

While rolling back crypto enforcement, easing SEC pressure, and publicly championing the industry from the Oval Office, Trump was also positioned to profit directly from crypto activity tied to his name. And then there was the rug pull(s).....

This graphic zooms in on one of the clearest conflict-of-interest loops in Trump’s second term: cryptocurrency.

Just before returning to office, Trump and his partners launched a memecoin branded around his names, $TRUMP. Trump then actively promoted the coin, driving investor demand. As buyers piled in, trading fees flowed through a series of Trump-linked entities, ultimately benefiting Trump’s trust.

One of the largest buyers was Justin Sun, the founder of the Tron blockchain, who reportedly spent over $40 million acquiring $TRUMP. At the same time, Sun and Tron were facing regulatory scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Under Trump, the SEC has since eased crypto enforcement and frozen or slowed several high-profile cases, including actions affecting firms tied to major Trump-aligned investors. The visual shows how business actions (green), business ties (dotted), and government actions (orange) converge around the president himself.

In plain terms:
• Trump promotes a financial product
• Wealthy investors buy in
• Fees flow to Trump-linked entities
• Regulatory pressure on the industry eases

Read 8 tweets

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Jan 1

Below is a non-exhaustive list of individuals who defrauded the American public, U.S. financial institutions, and taxpayer-funded systems out of billions of dollars through bank fraud, securities fraud, Medicare fraud, insurance fraud, and foreign-influence schemes.

They collapsed banks, looted public insurance pools, exploited federal healthcare programs, corrupted political processes, and wiped out retirement savings.

And they all share one thing in common.... Donald Trump pardoned or commuted them.

1. Sholom Rubashkin (Bank fraud, wire & mail fraud — sentence commuted Dec. 2017)

Born in Brooklyn, NY, to Haredi Jewish immigrant parents from Russia (his father Aaron was a kosher butcher who fled the Soviet Union). Rubashkin is part of a prominent Lubavitcher Hasidic family and served as CEO of Agriprocessors, once the largest kosher meatpacking plant in the U.S., based in Postville, Iowa.

In 2009, a federal jury convicted Rubashkin on 86 felony counts, including:
• bank fraud
• wire fraud
• mail fraud
• false statements to lenders
• money laundering

Prosecutors demonstrated that Rubashkin systematically inflated accounts receivable and falsified financial records to secure fraudulent loans, causing $26–27 million in losses to multiple financial institutions. He was sentenced to 27 years in federal prison, ordered to pay nearly $27 million in restitution, and placed under additional probation.

Despite the scale and duration of the fraud, Rubashkin became the focus of an intensive clemency campaign spearheaded by politically connected figures within the Chabad-Lubavitch network. The Aleph Institute, which advocates for Jewish prisoners, mobilized heavily on his behalf.

One of his most influential advocates was Alan Dershowitz who personally appealed to Trump, arguing Rubashkin’s sentence was “disproportionate.”

In December 2017, after Rubashkin had served just eight years of his 27-year sentence, Donald Trump commuted the sentence in full, his first major act of presidential clemency.

Crucially, this decision came after Agriprocessors had already become nationally notorious. In 2008, the facility was raided in the largest single ICE workplace operation in U.S. history, uncovering widespread wage theft, unsafe labor conditions, immigration violations, and the exploitation of undocumented and underage workers. While legally distinct from the bank-fraud case, these abuses formed the broader context

2. Michael Milken — “The Junk Bond King”
(Securities fraud, mail fraud, tax violations • Full Presidential Pardon, Feb 2020)

Michael Milken, born in Los Angeles to a middle-class Jewish family, rose to prominence in the 1970s–80s as the architect of the modern high-yield (“junk”) bond market while working at Drexel Burnham Lambert. Operating largely from Drexel’s Beverly Hills office, Milken transformed junk bonds into a powerful financial instrument, fueling hostile takeovers, leveraged buyouts, and corporate restructurings across Wall Street.

At his peak, Milken was reportedly earning over $500 million per year, becoming one of the highest-paid individuals in financial history.

In 1990, following a sweeping federal investigation led by Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. Attorney’s Office, Milken entered a plea deal and was convicted on six felony counts, including:
• securities fraud
• mail fraud
• tax violations
• conspiracy related to insider trading and stock manipulation

The investigation exposed a sprawling insider-trading network involving figures such as Ivan Boesky, with practices including stock parking, bid rigging, and market manipulation. Milken was initially facing up to 98 criminal counts and decades in prison.

He was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison (later reduced), served 22 months in minimum-security custody, paid $600 million in criminal fines, and an additional $200 million civil settlement with the SEC. He was permanently barred from the securities industry, one of the most severe financial penalties ever imposed on a Wall Street executive. Drexel Burnham Lambert collapsed shortly thereafter.

Despite the scale of the fraud, Milken launched a long-term rehabilitation campaign centered on philanthropy, healthcare funding, and elite political access. He became a major donor to Jewish and pro-Israel causes, including Chabad-affiliated institutions, medical research initiatives, and education programs. Over time, Milken was re-embraced by powerful sectors of finance, academia, and politics.

A broad coalition of elites pushed for his pardon, arguing that he had “paid his debt” and that his innovations had benefited the U.S. economy. Supporters included Wall Street executives, former prosecutors, politicians from both parties, and influential legal advocates including Alan Dershowitz, who publicly supported Milken’s clemency while also defending other controversial financial and criminal figures.

In February 2020, Donald Trump issued a full presidential pardon, completely wiping Milken’s criminal record. Trump cited Milken’s charitable work and claimed his original prosecution reflected excesses of the 1980s financial crackdown.

Milken’s pardon became one of the most significant white-collar financial exonerations of the modern era not because new evidence emerged, but because sustained elite pressure reframed systemic fraud as “innovation” and criminal accountability as “overreach.”

Read 12 tweets

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Dec 19, 2025

🇵🇸🇺🇸 Kushner and Witkoff Unveil New, Sinister Plan for Gaza

The Wall Street Journal reports that the U.S. has drafted a 32-page reconstruction blueprint for Gaza, called “Project Sunrise,” aimed at transforming the destroyed enclave into a high-tech coastal metropolis.

According to the WSJ, the plan was developed over the past 45 days by a team led by Ivanka's Twink and Trump's real estate agent, with involvement from senior White House aide Josh Gruenbaum, input from Israeli officials, and consultations with private-sector contractors.

The proposal, circulated as a “sensitive but unclassified” PowerPoint presentation, has already been shown to prospective donor governments, including wealthy Gulf states, Turkey, and Egypt, U.S. officials told the Journal.

The plan envisions moving Gaza’s population “from tents to penthouses” and “from poverty to prosperity,” but notably:
• It does not specify where Gaza’s ~2 million displaced residents would live during reconstruction
• It does not name which countries or companies would ultimately fund the project
• It assumes a post-war political and security environment that U.S. officials themselves say may never materialize

The total projected cost is $112.1 billion over 10 years, with the United States positioned as an “anchor” backer, committing to roughly 20% of total costs through grants and debt guarantees.

The WSJ reports that Project Sunrise explicitly reimagines Gaza as a “digitally-driven smart city,” with tech-centric governance at its core, not just reconstruction.

According to the draft presentation, the plan prioritizes:
• Modern telecom and satellite systems
• Secure digital identity and “trust frameworks”
• Shared digital platforms for payments, data exchange, signatures, and notifications
• Smart-city services spanning utilities, transportation, mobility, and urban management
• A centralized Chief Digital Office to set standards and guide policymaking

This is a permanent, full digital governance model, designed before basic questions, like where Gaza’s displaced population would live during rebuilding, are answered.

U.S. officials told the Journal the plan depends entirely on Hamas “demilitarizing and decommissioning all weapons and tunnels,” a condition highlighted in bold red on the proposal’s second page. Yet the smart-city architecture is already mapped in detail.

Political control and digital infrastructure are being designed in parallel, even as U.S. officials privately doubt the security conditions will ever exist to implement the plan.

The Executive Summary of Project Sunrise

At the very top (highlighted in red) the plan states that all reconstruction is contingent on Hamas “demilitarizing and decommissioning all weapons and tunnels.”

The document frames Gaza’s devastation not as a humanitarian catastrophe, but as an “opportunity” to create a gateway of prosperity and a global model of renewal, positioning Gaza as a commercial corridor connecting the Middle East, Africa, and beyond.

Key financial facts outlined in the summary:
• $4.2 billion per year in grants
• $1.5 billion per year in sovereign debt guarantees
• Sustained over 10 years, covering humanitarian aid, security, cleanup, and reconstruction
• Gaza is expected to self-fund remaining reconstruction and repay debt
• The United States commits to anchoring at least 20% of all total costs across workstreams

In other words, humanitarian aid is paired from the outset with long-term debt obligations, sovereign guarantees, and donor returns, what the plan itself calls “value creation for both citizens and donors.”

Read 6 tweets

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Dec 8, 2025

🇺🇸THE CONSTRUCTION OF CANDACE: A THREAD🧵

Earlier this year we reported that Candace Owens was introduced to her husband George Farmer by Allie Hanley, wife of William Lee Hanley Jr, who ran the CIA's media arm the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Let's dig deeper! (1/x)

The CPB is essentially the domestic version of Voice of America (the CIA's international media arm which was ran by Tucker Carlson's dad). Lee Hanley, who ran the CPB under the Reagan administration, was also best friends and a donor to CIA director Porter Goss. (2/x)

Tucker Carlson's dad, Dick Carlson, not only ran Voice of America, but he became the CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in 1992, just a few years after Lee Hanley ran it, what a small world Candace and Tucker have been a part of! (3/x)

Read 24 tweets

DD Geopolitics

@DD_Geopolitics

Nov 3, 2025

🇺🇸🇮🇱Trump addressed the Republican Jewish Coalition on Saturday. It’s… a wild ride.

Delusion, self-worship, and open pledges of loyalty to his biggest donors, let’s take a closer look at what he said:

Trump opens by congratulating the RJC on “40 amazing years” and immediately launches into self-congratulations, calling his 2024 win “the most important election victory in the history of our country.”

He thanks RJC leadership, Norm Coleman, Matt Brooks, and his “friend” Miriam Adelson, the Israeli-born billionaire megadonor behind hundreds of millions in Trump funding and credits the RJC for helping him “win all seven swing states by millions of votes.”

Then comes the punchline:

“I can’t imagine we didn’t do better than that after all I’ve done for the Jewish vote.”

What exactly have you done for the Jewish vote Trump?

Trump continues his tirade of word salad, jumping from “we were a dead country” to “the hottest country anywhere in the world” in the same breath. It’s part motivational speech, part fever dream.

He claims wages are rising “at the fastest rate in 60 years,” that $18 trillion is “pouring into the U.S.” He doesn’t say whether he means real wages vs. inflation or what the $18T even refers to (FDI? market cap? government revenue?).

He’s “ended eight wars in nine months.” None of this is substantiated. The war in Gaza is not over, and neither is Ukraine and he's threatening new military actions in Venezuela, Colombia, and Nigeria. Not to mention Israeli airstrikes on Gaza dn Lebanon CONTINUE DAILY.

"I terminated the disastrous Iran nuclear deal." Here he is once again admitting that the termination of the JCPOA was done for Israel and it set the ball rolling for Operation Midnight Hammer. Trump all but admits that had he been re-elected in 2020, an attack on Iran FOR Israel was certain.

“Israel has never had a better friend than President Donald J. Trump.” Yes we know, even though he and JD Vance insist his moves are “America-first.”

Trump nearly slips here, starting to say, "I also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the—" before cutting himself off. THIS sounds like he began to say something that either wasn’t scripted or would’ve been politically explosive. If he were referring to the Golan Heights, he wouldn’t hesitate, that’s already U.S. policy, and he’s bragged about it countless times. The fact that he stops himself strongly suggests he almost said “West Bank” or “Judea and Samaria.” Or maybe he forgot what the Golan Heights were again.

He finishes by revisiting the Jerusalem embassy move, framed as a “promise kept.” The question, of course, is: promised to whom? and when?

Trump constantly frames himself as the only president with the “guts” to do what others wouldn’t. But there’s a reason those before him didn’t, those norms existed to keep America’s foreign policy predictable and lawful.

Acting like a maverick for the sake of ego has destabilized entire regions. Being the only one “brave enough” to ignore precedent isn’t strength, it’s recklessness dressed up as leadership.

Trump closes his address by bragging about tearing the U.S. out of international human-rights bodies, cutting funding to UNRWA, and silencig free speecg in the US, for Israel.

“I withdrew the United States from the anti-American, anti-Israel UN Human Rights Council.”

— The UN Human Rights Council is not “anti-American.” It’s the main international body that investigates war crimes and human rights abuses, including those committed by U.S. allies. What Trump means is that it’s critical of Israel. This statement exposes how he conflates Israel’s interests with America’s, implying that anything opposing Israeli policy is automatically anti-U.S.

“Terminated funding for the extremely corrupt United Nations Relief and Works Agency, a totally corrupt operation.”

— He’s referring to UNRWA, the agency providing food, medical aid, and schooling for millions of Palestinian civilians. Israel demanded this cut, and Trump delivered. The result? Starvation and humanitarian collapse in Gaza. There was no proven corruption scandal, the “corruption” claim was political cover to dismantle Palestinian civil society under Israeli pressure.

“We’re also defending our Jewish citizens here in America … we’re deporting the foreign jihadist sympathizers and Hamas supporters from our country, and it’s happening very quickly.”

— This line should alarm anyone who believes in civil liberties. Trump is bragging about mass deportations based on ideological affiliation, not crimes, without due process, investigation, or evidence. “Hamas supporters” could mean students protesting genocide, journalists, or anyone critical of Israel. It’s collective punishment imported to U.S. soil.

“My administration has filed historic civil rights laws and cut off funding to colleges and universities that refuse to defend their Jewish students.”

— Translation: universities that allowed campus protests or anti-Zionist organizing were threatened with losing federal funding. “Defending” Jewish students meant censoring speech, firing faculty, and policing thought. Again, Trump is turning the Department of Education into a political instrument for one foreign cause.

“We have secured some of the largest discrimination settlements in modern times.”

— Those “settlements” are payouts to people claiming emotional distress from campus debates about Israel. They’re not justice, they’re intimidation tactics meant to make universities and students afraid to ever question Israeli policy again.

“In just nine months, we have done more to protect Jewish Americans than any administration in history.”

— That line is incredibly revealing. He’s openly saying his government prioritizes one small demographic, not Americans as a whole, not civil rights in general, not equality under law, but one politically powerful constituency with deep financial and lobbying ties to his campaign. If you're listening he's telling you.....

"Together we will make America stronger, safer, richer, prouder, and greater than ever before.”

— The classic Trump closer, but by this point, it’s clear what he means by “we.” His America is not a pluralistic nation of citizens; it’s a political alliance between his administration and the same donor network that funds Israeli expansionism abroad and political enforcement at home.