Starting Labor Day laboring over the case filed yesterday by immigration "advocates" seeking to block the administration from sending back home hundreds of unaccompanied Guatemalan children here under the sketchiest of circumstances.
Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, a Biden appointee, in the wee hours of a Sunday halted what the Trump adm calls the reunification of minors who came here during the Biden regime. The lawsuit accuses the DOJ and HHS of violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 related to ten minors (cited only by their initials as all these cases do) between the ages of 10 and 17.
The declarations of the minors contain pretty mind-blowing stuff--I will post in a separate thread--but here is what Judge Sooknanan ordered yesterday in her "return the planes!" Boasberg moment.
But useful to note that she was very explicit in her written order about prohibiting the removal of the unaccompanied minors--quite the opposite of Boasberg's "oral order" which he failed to document in a follow up written order, which is now the subject of litigation in his contempt claims against the Trump DOJ. (More on that later, too!)
This latest version of tyrant-in-a-robe also tried to follow Boasberg's contempt trap model: she moved up a scheduled hearing, gave initial "class action" status to any child slated for return home, then made an unreasonable demand of the DOJ to file a status report related to her order (on a Sunday afternoon.) When they didn't meet her ridiculous deadline, she added another demand for DOJ to "show cause" as to why they didn't:
The DOJ attorney--the same one before Boasberg in the Alien Enemies Act litigation and the same one Boasberg has accused of contempt--had to inform Judge ✨why they hadn't yet filed a status report:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here are some of the declarations filed by the National Immigration Law Center who is suing the Trump adm to prevent sending back home hundreds of unaccompanied minors here illegally from Guatemala:
A 16 year old who was either pregnant or became pregnant on her trek here:
A 10-year-old here under unknown circumstances.
I want to know who brought her to the US and why.
(And to answer someone's question on 1st post, all were written by Spanish interpreters--as is the case in all of these deportation/removal lawsuits.)
Hearing underway now before Judge Jia Cobb in DC related to Lisa Cook's lawsuit against the president and Fed chief Jerome Powell over her firing as a member of the Federal Reserve Board.
Cook, appointed by Biden in 2022 and confirmed by the Senate with a tie-breaking vote cast by Kamala Harris, is being credibly accused of mortgage fraud related to three separate mortgages (!) she took out in 2021.
She is fighting her firing claiming the loan applications were filed prior to her appointment to the Fed board and that the president didn't follow the law in removing her. She wants Judge Cobb to enter a temp restraining order to keep her on the board.
Cobb starts hearing by asking Cook atty whether they intend to file a motion for a preliminary injunction (usually the next step after request for a temp restraining order). Attorney--I believe Abbe Lowell is speaking but hard to tell--says yes. Cobb says she is prepared to set an "expedited" briefing schedule to determine the merits of the case.
He keeps referring to Cook as "governor" 🙄
DOJ says they don't object to converting TRO motion to motion for prelim injunction.
Here is Cook's proposed TRO order for Judge Cobb to consider:
Cook atty attempting to dismiss allegations of mortgage fraud and those allegations do not represent "cause" needed to justify removal.
Cook atty raises Humphrey's Executor case--one that keep coming up in nearly all the lawsuits against the president related to firings/dismissals--that "cause" needs to be specific.
Judge Cobb asks for citation to back up Cook's claims any malfeasance prior to appointment cannot represent "cause" for firing. Cook atty doesn't have one and doesn't really rule it out but ponders whether the allegations were known at time of confirmation.
Cobb: "Where do I get the authority for that?" She's asking for case law to support his position that past behavior does not represent "cause."
So J6 celeb cop Danny Hodges is back doing media hits blasting Trump adm for trying to keep DC safe. Hodges is still a DC police officer but appears to have done little else over a four year period besides do interviews and show up at J6 court proceedings as a witness and “victim.”
Here is how Hodges once again misrepresents his experience on January 6. But he was not a victim…
Here is Hodges body worn camera footage. He and his fellow DC cops arrived around 2pm dressed like storm troopers ready to crack heads. This was about 50 minutes after cops had been attacking Trump supporters outside.
Listen to the reaction…
More from Hodges—whose checkered shirt nice guy soft spoken routine belies the thuggery he demonstrated on Jan 6…
While all eyes focus on Comey/Brennan/Clapper related to new disclosures on Russiagate and potential criminal liability, let's not forget lesser known figures who are just as culpable in the decade-long abuse of power against President Trump.
One individual is Lisa Monaco...
Here is part one of my two part series covering Monaco's dirty fingerprints stretching from Russiagate to Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation.
It is not a coincidence Pres Trump's called out Monaco twice by name last month...
According to responses to Judicial Watch FOIA on infamous Jan 5, 2017 White House meeting with Obama, Brennan, Comey, Clapper, and Biden--Monaco also attended.
In fact, she kept notes in a notebook from Jan 3 to Jan 20, 2017. Those entries are under seal. Hopefully not for long
So the latest spin against Tulsi Gabbard's release is AKSHULLY NO ONE SAID THE RUSSIANS HACKED ELECTION SYSTEMS AND CHANGED VOTES
But that is EXACTLY what everyone from Pres Obama down--including the media--intimated. So did Brennan's ICA regardless of how he wants to worm out of it.
Further, another reason why this Dec 8 PBD was pulled is because Trump, as president-elect-would have received it.
Following the Dec 9 in the WH after the president's daily briefing was pulled and the conspirators plotted their next move, James Clapper's office produced this outline "per the President's request" on Russian election interference.
Top item: HACKING
Another item: CYBER ACTIVITY AGAINST VOTING SYSTEMS
This is directly from ICA.
Note the sleight of hand. And why would this only be attributed to DHS? Why not a stronger statement given the IC's conclusion the previous month?
This left the door open for Obama, his toadies, and the media to beat the drum about "Russian hacking."