Thread by @FinalTelegraph

It's time to take down Stephen King once and for all. He is a fraud, a hypocrite, and a morally bankrupt failure. Let's do the deepest dive on the internet exposing the biggest coward behind a keyboard on X.

The King of Hypocrisy: Deconstructing the Fraud of Stephen King

Stephen King isn't just a washed-up horror writer. He's the perfect monument to leftist hypocrisy: a half-billionaire socialist who preaches tax fairness from a Florida mansion, a moral crusader whose fiction wallows in child depravity, and a creative ghost who fled the free market of ideas the moment he lost control. It's time to pull back the curtain on the court jester of the woke Left. THREAD:

Let's start with the money. Stephen King has a net worth of $500 million and pulls in as much as $20 million a year. He built this empire within the capitalist system he relentlessly condemns. This is the man who wrote an essay titled "Tax Me, for F@%&'s Sake!" demanding the rich pay more, declaring it "un-f--king-American" for the middle class to bear a disproportionate burden. A noble sentiment, until you see where he lives.

For years, King has maintained a residence in a waterfront mansion on Casey Key, Florida—a state with a 0% personal income tax. When Maine's former governor called him out for fleeing the state's tax burden, King furiously denied it, insisting he and his wife "pay every cent" of their Maine income taxes and "are glad to do it". But the strategy is clear: establish residency where it's most financially advantageous. He preaches the gospel of high taxes from the comfort of a tax haven.

His hypocrisy doesn't end with income tax. King recently converted his iconic, blood-red mansion in Bangor, Maine, into a non-profit archive and writer's retreat. This isn't just philanthropy; it's a shrewd financial move that removes a valuable asset from the property tax rolls. He argues that private charity "doesn't go far enough" and that only the state can solve society's problems, yet he structures his own life to minimize his obligations to that same state.

When he's not counting his money, King spends his time as a hyper-partisan Twitter troll. His feed is a monument to TDS, calling Trump a "horror story," an "incompetent asshole," and a "dimbulb". He attacks conservatives with the nuance of a sledgehammer, calling Marjorie Taylor Greene "Moscow Marjorie" and mocking Dan Bongino's exit from Fox News. This isn't principled opposition; it's the unhinged rage of a man terrified of losing cultural relevance.

His recent flight from X (formerly Twitter) is the ultimate act of cowardice. He claimed the atmosphere became "too toxic". The truth? He fled because it became too free. For years, he was a bully in a curated echo chamber. When Elon Musk opened the gates, King's simplistic screeds were suddenly met with debate and mockery. Unable to control the narrative, he took his ball and went home. He didn't leave a toxic space; he left a free one.

This political obsession has poisoned his art. The King who wrote The Shining is dead. In his place is a creatively bankrupt ideologue churning out woke pulp. Long-time fans and critics agree his new work has lost its "bite," reading like "poorly written YA". His novels are no longer about universal fears; they're tedious lectures on contemporary liberal anxieties, with villains who are just lazy caricatures of his political opponents.

The creative rot is deep. His 2023 novel Holly was criticized for using its villains to air his personal frustrations with anti-vaxxers, rather than offering any insightful commentary. His characters have become interchangeable, feeling like "another Stephen King character" rather than distinct individuals. The once-great innovator has become a predictable formula machine, his creative well completely dry.

Perhaps the most damning sign of his artistic failure is that his novel The Institute feels like it was inspired by the TV show Stranger Things—a series that was, itself, a loving homage to King's own 1980s classics. He is no longer an innovator but an imitator of his own imitators. He's a ghost chasing his own legacy in a desperate, pathetic attempt to remain relevant in a culture that has moved on.

But the greatest hypocrisy lies not in his wallet or his politics, but in the pages of his books. King has built a persona as a moral arbiter, lecturing America on its sins. Yet his own fiction is a sewer of nihilism and depravity, with a grotesque and persistent obsession with the sexualization and violent degradation of children.

The most indefensible passage in his entire canon is the child orgy scene in his 1986 novel It. The seven pre-pubescent protagonists engage in a group sexual act in the sewers, a moment so repugnant that both the TV miniseries and the blockbuster film adaptations completely erased it. This isn't art; it's a glimpse into a deeply disturbed worldview, one that he has profited from for decades.

This isn't an isolated incident. It's a pattern. His work is a landscape of nihilistic violence. Children are primary victims, like the agonizing death of five-year-old Tad Trenton in Cujo. Religion is consistently portrayed as a source of evil and hysteria, from the fanatical Mrs. Carmody in  

The Mist to the abusive mother in Carrie. He finds evil not in sin, but in tradition.

His stories are parables of societal collapse where traditional institutions—family, church, community—are corrupt and malevolent. Salvation is found not through virtue, but through transgression, as with the bizarre sexual ritual in it. This reflects the core of the leftist ideology he champions: that traditional morality must be destroyed for "liberation" to occur. His fiction is a blueprint for the cultural decay he advocates for in public.

The real horror story isn't Donald Trump; it's Stephen King's own hypocrisy. A man who amasses a half-billion-dollar fortune while condemning the system that created it. A man who demands the rich pay their "fair share" from his no-income-tax Florida estate. A man who pens a child orgy scene and then presumes to lecture the nation on morality.

He is a relic. A living artifact of a liberal establishment whose cultural power is collapsing. A financial hypocrite, a creative failure, a moral fraud, and an intellectual coward. The "King of Horror" has abdicated his throne. He is now merely the Court Jester of the Woke Left, a sad, bitter figure shouting into an echo chamber, utterly irrelevant to the conversations shaping America's future.

The final verdict is not anger, but pity. Anger grants an opponent importance. Pity is reserved for the pathetic. By dismantling every pillar of his public persona—his financial integrity, his artistic merit, his moral authority—we reveal him as a spent force. The correct response to his next unhinged tirade is not outrage, but a dismissive laugh. The jester's show is over.

If you like my content please consider buying a copy of Saggezza Eterna. Read the intro free on Amazon using the link: Thanks to your support we are now Number One in new releases in our category and on the first page of "The Philosophy of Good and Evil" ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐amazon.com/dp/B0FGXMWRYP