Thread by @theHFDF

The FDA just approved a new vaccine for infants with ZERO placebo-controlled safety studies.

It has a 5.3% rate of serious adverse events.

This is not science—it’s a pyramid scheme.

And we just EXPOSED all of it:

The safety trial didn’t compare the new vaccine to a placebo.

It was compared with another vaccine—which was ALSO approved with zero placebo-controlled safety studies.

Vaccine “science” is just lies on top of lies on top of more lies.

Bookmark this thread.

We’re about to expose the entire vaccine pyramid scheme:

🧵THREAD

Bookmark this thread above.

The TRUTH is this: our vaccine schedule is based on lies on top of lies on top of … more lies.

Join us for a deep dive into Vaccine Wonderland:🧵

The FDA just approved a new quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine by Sanofi, called MenQuadfi, for infants aged 6 weeks to 23 months.

This is the latest black mark in the FDA’s checkered history.

And it’s further proof of the reckless swindle that has become standard operating procedure for all vaccine approvals.

🚨Before we dive into this thread …

We are on the front lines of the fight for your freedoms against Pharma and Big Government.

And we need your support to win this.

Join our fight today.

Become an HFDF Member for just $10: secure.anedot.com/health-freedom…

This is how the FDA’s Mad Hatter “logic” for vaccine approval works, detailed in the 2022 book Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth …

“After a lecture on cosmology and the structure of the solar system, [William] James was accosted by a little old lady.”

She said:

“Your theory that the Sun is the centre of the solar system, and the earth is a ball which rotates around it has a very convincing ring to it … but it’s wrong. I’ve got a better theory.”

“That we live on a crust of earth which is on the back of a giant turtle.”

“The first turtle stands on the back of a second, far larger, turtle, who stands directly under him.”

James asked: “But what does the second turtle stand on?”

“It’s no use, Mr. James—it’s turtles all the way down,” she replied.

The old lady’s irrational explanation is the same line of reasoning the FDA used to justify licensure of the new MenQuadfi vaccine.

The “placebo” used in trials to establish the safety profile for MenQuadfi was no placebo at all.

It was the meningitis vaccine Menveo.

In other words, Sanofi used another vaccine as a comparator rather than a true placebo, like saline water.

🚨Sanofi’s trials revealed that an ALARMING 5.3% of infants injected with MenQuadfi experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE).

3.6% of infants experienced an SAE after the Menveo vaccine.

By comparing MenQuadfi’s 5.3% risk to Menveo’s 3.6% risk, the FDA claimed the “similar” SAE rates meant that the MenQuadfi vaccine must be “safe” simply because Menveo is assumed to be “safe.”

In a sleight of hand as clever as a professional magician’s tricks, the FDA took two risky products and compared them to one another in order to make the adverse effects to babies seem less alarming for the new MenQuadfi vaccine.

But if the FDA were honest, it would have recognized the clear danger signals for both drugs and REFUSED to approve either one.

🚨But the plot thickens …

Using the Menveo vaccine as a “placebo” should have been egregious enough to render the MenQuadfi trial null and void.

Upon further investigation, however, we discover that the Menveo safety trial was standing on a bigger turtle.

Menveo’s licensure was based on a trial in which Sanofi’s meningococcal vaccine, Menactra, was used as the control.

And Menactra’s licensure stood on an even bigger turtle.

Menactra was licensed based on a safety trial that used Sanofi’s Menomune vaccine (discontinued in 2017) as a control.

Menomune, meanwhile, NEVER faced a proper placebo-controlled trial.

🚨Before we go on with the thread …

We’re fighting lawsuits across America—from Los Angeles to the CDC—to strike back against tyrannical medical mandates.

🔥 Join our fight today.

We need your support.

Become an HFDF Member for just $10: secure.anedot.com/health-freedom…

The FDA’s package insert for Menomune from 2016 made a SHOCKING admission:

“Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in clinical trials of a vaccine cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another vaccine and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice.”

Thus, the FDA admitted that its own logic used to approve the Menactra, Menveo, and MenQuadfi vaccines is null and void.

What does this mean for the FDA’s vaccine approval process?

We have vaccines that got approved based on comparisons with previous vaccines …

… that got approved based on comparisons with previous vaccines …

… that got approved based on no proper safety tests.

All of this makes for an upside-down Vaccine Wonderland.

No true placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are anywhere to be found—EVER.

Instead, the public is saddled with a product that has a HIGHER risk of serious harm than the disease it’s supposed to prevent.

In the words of ICAN lead attorney, Aaron:

“[It’s] a pyramid scheme of safety.”

“At the bottom … there is no baseline on which safety is being judged. Just a get-it-licensed-to-profit shell game.”

“FDA and pharma have nothing to lose here.”

“We, as taxpayers, will pay for all of the harms suffered and, worst of all, the children who are injected and harmed and their families will really pay for the harms.”

🚨Before you go: we can’t fight Pharma and Big Government alone.

We have won LANDMARK lawsuits striking down tyrannical medical mandates—but we need your support.

Become an HFDF Member for just $10: secure.anedot.com/health-freedom…

Or, donate to HFDF here: secure.anedot.com/health-freedom…