🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸Checkmate in the Pacific: How China's Missiles Have Made US Power Projection Obsolete
A sobering analysis confirms the US military is fundamentally outmatched. China's precision-strike complex can decimate American air forces on day one.
Here's how 🧵
Let's be blunt: the US military is no longer the dominant power in the Western Pacific.
China's vast arsenal of precision missiles and satellites has created a kill zone where US bases and carriers are not shields, but giant, vulnerable targets.
The US strategy hinges on airpower, but this is now its greatest vulnerability. The simulations show that no matter where the US flies from—large bases, small fields, near or far—China can saturate them with barrages of accurate ballistic and cruise missiles.
The losses are not just bad; they are catastrophic and war-ending.
The US would likely lose 200-400 aircraft in the opening weeks—primarily destroyed on the tarmac.
This isn't a setback; it's a defeat from which the USAF couldn't recover.
The Pentagon's plan to "get agile" (Agile Combat Employment) is a fantasy. Dispersing to smaller, austere airfields doesn't save planes; it just puts them on bases with fewer defenses and no shelters, making them even easier targets.
This flawed doctrine forces a horrific choice:
🔸Either accept the annihilation of your air force
🔸Or, in a crisis, immediately launch escalatory attacks to blind Chinese satellites.
There is no middle ground. Deterrence is now a dangerous bluff.
The only potential solution—hardening bases with hundreds of shelters—is a monumental task the US hasn't even started. Meanwhile, China has already built over 800 shelters for its own air force.
US is years behind in the defense that desperately need.
Even if US built them, it's an arms race that might not win. China's missile production dwarfs the West's. The grim math suggests they can produce missiles faster and cheaper than US can build shelters to protect against them.
US allies cannot save them
While South Korea's 700+ hardened shelters are a tantalizing lifeline, Seoul has shown zero appetite for being drawn into a US-China war over Taiwan. Counting on them is a dangerous gamble.
The uncomfortable truth:
The US is on a trajectory to lose a war with China US have three bad options:
🔸Spend trillions playing catch-up
🔸Retreat to a less vulnerable but less influential force
🔸Reconsider US geopolitical commitments in Asia
The era of US primacy is over
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Russia's Night Strike Decimates Ukrainian Military Infrastructure
Last night, Russian forces launched one of the largest coordinated strikes of the conflict. Over 500+ drones and missiles hit critical targets of arms production and rail logistics.
Here's the impact🧵
🔻Znamenka, Kirovohrad region
A massive strike targeted the critical Znamenka railway hub (DN-3), paralyzing freight in central Ukraine for 10+ hours.
Confirmed destroyed:
🔸 Locomotive depot (repair units for military train engines)
🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺The US Is Repeating the Soviet Union's Final Fatal Mistake
Massive government spending is overpowering the Federal Reserve, threatening the dollar's stability. The US is on the same path that led to the USSR's currency collapse.
Here’s how🧵
The Mechanism: Flooding the System with Liquidity
🇺🇸: M2 money supply is growing at +4.8% YoY, with a record $22.1T in circulation. This is driven by massive Treasury issuance to fund deficits, not direct Fed printing.
USSR: The state printed rubles directly to cover yawning budget deficits from failed economic programs and military spending.
The source differs (bond markets vs. printing press) but the effect is identical: a massive, artificial increase in the money supply that devalues each unit of currency.
The Problem:
🔸US Debt Explosion: Federal debt held by the public has nearly tripled in the last 15 years, soaring from $10 trillion in 2010 to over $28 trillion today.
🔸Soviet Debt Explosion: In its final years, the USSR's budget deficit exploded to over 10% of GDP, and its foreign hard currency debt more than doubled between 1985 and 1991.
In both cases, the central bank lost control, becoming an enabler of unsustainable spending rather than an independent guardian of the economy.
🚨 ISRAEL'S PLAYBOOK: What if Russia wiped out Ukraine's top brass in one swift strike?
It's tempting—but is it smart? What are the strategic pros, cons, and why Russia's holding back for now 🧵
Paradoxically, keeping Zelensky in place benefits Russia.
He embodies a regime fully dependent on the US and NATO, with no real independence.
His fiery rhetoric about strikes on Moscow only underscores Ukraine as a Western proxy threatening Russian security.
This dependency is a powerful narrative for Russia: it highlights how Kiev lacks sovereign will, making any escalation from Ukraine look like puppetry by Washington and Brussels.
Eliminating him could disrupt this clear proof of external control.