đź§µUN's Francesca Albanese, misrepresents herself as a lawyer despite lacking credentials. Her actions, now include giving legal advice to participants of the Freedom Flotilla, telling them their actions "are 100% legal." She must be held accountable.
@HillelNeuer @UNWatch
Francesca has been exposed for falsely claiming to be a “lawyer.” She admitted to never passing the Italian bar exam and isn’t registered with the official bar association. Under Italian law, misrepresenting oneself as a lawyer is a crime, punishable by imprisonment and fines.
Francesca’s involvement with the Freedom Flotilla goes beyond a legal misrepresentation. She participated in an organizer meeting, assured them their actions were "100% legal," and gave false legal guidance. This aggravates the crime. Not a lawyer, advising directly a group
Let’s not forget: the Gaza blockade is legal under international law, affirmed by the UN in the 2010 "Palmer Report." Its purpose is to prevent weapons and terror materials from reaching Hamas. Breaching the blockade it’s a crime, not to mention a direct support for terror.
With Greta Thunberg's Gaza Flotilla, Francesca claimed to communicate with participants during interception, unclear if for legal or moral support. Now, she advised them beforehand under a false title, and they are acting on her guidance, making her actions far more serious.
Special Rapporteurs have limited immunity, only covering official functions. Francesca’s actions aren’t protected by UN immunity. Her role is to investigate, report, and advise on human rights—not participate in political protests or give legal guidance for unlawful actions
Francesca’s actions go beyond ideological support for the flotilla. This isn’t a lapse in judgment, but reckless misrepresentation and a blatant disregard for the law.
Not to mention the flotilla's ties to Hamas.
She must be held accountable.
🧵Once again, The Guardian & +972Mag recycle Hamas/PIJ lists to smear Israel—first to claim 83% of Gaza dead were “civilians,” now that 75% of arrests are “innocents.” Armed fighters in disguise aren’t civilians. This isn’t journalism but coordinated propaganda.
The Guardian & +972Mag claim 75% of 6,000 arrested in Gaza are “civilians” is not is not only false, it inverts reality. In reality, the list they use is from Hamas/PIJ. Armed fighters, fake medics & Oct 7 invaders aren’t “civilians.”
This isn’t a misstep—it’s recycled propaganda. The same Hamas/PIJ list once claimed 83% of Gaza dead were “civilians.” In truth, 17% are confirmed terrorists; the rest unverified. Now it’s reused to say 75% of arrests are “innocents” civilians. This isn’t journalism.
đź§µEXPOSED: A leaked document reveals that Reporters without Borders & Avaaz have secured the participation of around 150 media outlets from some 50 countries, alongside journalists and press freedom organisations, instructing them to publish the same message, on the same day
The leaked doc instructs to post on the same day, same hashtags, same message. Black front pages, scripted TV, coordinated feeds. T
Their unified script?
“At the rate journalists are being killed in Gaza by the Israeli army, there will soon be no one left to keep you informed.”
Leaked doc show outlets were given strict instructions:
📰 Print – blacked-out front pages with one message
📺 Broadcast – read aloud to a metronome, Israel named sole culprit
💻 Online – banners, newsletters & hashtags synced worldwide, midnight-to-midnight
🧵For decades UN/NGOs relied on what @NGOmonitor calls the “Halo Effect”—their reports accepted as gospel. Now, when flaws are exposed, they demand we ignore definitions, evidence & contradictions.
Never question the UN or big NGOs is the unspoken rule. The “Halo Effect,” the aura of credibility surrounding these organizations—means that their findings were virtually immune to fact-checking and often amplified by the media.
Oct 7 shattered the old rule of blind trust. Now journalists, researchers, technologists & citizens are dissecting UN/NGO claims with open-source data. The “Halo Effect” is cracking—exposing who wrote the reports, how data is twisted, what was ignored, & the agendas behind it.
🧵After Oct 7, Jewish communities saw a sudden global surge in anti-Israel actions—protests, lawsuits, campaigns, diplomacy—all seemingly coordinated. A new study from Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu Univ. reveals how Palestinian groups orchestrated these efforts with precision.
Why it matters: This study exposes how Palestinian groups built a unified global advocacy machine—overcoming internal rifts to coordinate messaging. Jewish communities, often reactive and divided, can draw lessons to strengthen strategy and unity in facing this challenge.
Methodology: Researchers analyzed 150 sources (Oct ’23–Dec ’24)—from Hamas/PA statements to legal briefs, NGO reports, media & digital campaigns. Thematic analysis revealed 5 pillars of a unified advocacy ecosystem bridging long-standing Palestinian factional divides.
🧵The UN’s Gaza “famine” claim isn’t science—it’s politics. The IPC’s own authors bent rules, cherry-picked data, ignored food imports, and limited famine to a 17 sq mile Gaza pocket. The Gaza famine declaration wasn’t just bad science — it was written by activists.
Let's start from what the headlines missed. The UN declared “famine” ONLY in GAZA CITY—17 sq miles—not all of Gaza. If famine at that scale truly existed, people could easily walk a few miles. Essentially the UN declared, there is famine in the living room, not in the kitchen”
The IPC didn’t lower the famine threshold as first reported—but it used a less reliable metric, MUAC, ignoring the rules for its use. MUAC requires multiple confirming indicators; here, the declaration rested on a single, flawed measure. But that's not all
🧵 @RepMTG used @megynkelly & @MegynKellyShow to spread lies: Israel-US aid, AIPAC a “foreign agent,” flag rulings misrepresented, Gaza “starvation” false, trips distorted. I respect Megyn as a journalist—she asks tough questions, but her platform was used to spread lies.
The myth: MTG claims US gives Israel a “blank check” of $3.8B/yr to freely fund weapons. False. Aid isn’t charity—it’s strategic: designed to strengthen Israel while preventing it from competing w/ US defense exports.
Unlike Jordan, Egypt & Lebanon, which get cash grants, Israel’s aid is mostly credit to buy US-made weapons. A small portion funds joint R&D, but patents remain US-owned. Israel can innovate in drones & missile defense, but must shelve projects that compete w/ US exports.