Marko Papic Profile picture
Sep 4 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Lots of chatter out there about how there is a GLOBAL long-dated bond selloff afoot and how that is weird. (This is a 🧵).

I am sympa to that view as I've called President Trump a "Human Steepener" and was SHORT DURATION due to his campaign from September 2024 to January 2025.
But then something strange happened: the GOP in the House REVOLTED against President Trump's campaign promises and the One Big Beautiful Bill (once we combine it with the TAX increase that is the tariffs) came out far less profligate. As a result, I ended my short duration position in January 2025, due to that revolt. Since then, the 10-year has been well behaved and even has dropped below 4.2% today.
But this chart has become popular on FinTwit. It shows how the 30-year yield is not reacting to the upcoming Fed rate cuts and how this is somehow "weird" and a sign of a fiscal crisis. Image
To prove that this is "weird," we are shown this chart, from 2020. Note how the 30 year yield fell along with the fed funds futures and the target rate. BOOM. There it is. Evidence of an imminent fiscal crisis this time around. Image
But wait a minute. What happened during the GFC? Nothing. Same thing as today. Image
And what about amidst the dot-com boom?

Again. Nothing. Image
Actually, both in 2001 and 2009, long-dated yields kind of went HIGHER.

And think about it, this makes sense. Why should long-dated yields go down because of something that is happening over the next 12-18 months? A recession comes and goes.
Which brings me to the 2020 recession. Folks need to stop referring to it. People lost their goddamn minds! How many of you thought it would produce a deflationary depression? I know who you are. (Mostly tech bros!). YOU know who you are.
Of course the 30-year rallied hard. The median investor thought that they'd be watching their grandkids doing Zoom school from a bunker. That proved wildly incorrect.
The point is that there is no sign that the 30-year is blowing out because of a fiscal crisis. This narrative is overstated. Ultimately, the 10-year yield should be rising if bonds were selling off due to fiscal policy. And yet, following the passage of OBBBA, yields have FALLEN.
Now, what could upset the cart here is the Supreme Court case on tariffs. We are in an upside-down world where yields are likely to rise if SCOTUS strikes down tariffs, which is BEARISH for equities.

As such, the bulls find themselves in a weird situation of having to cheer on for Trump's tariffs in order to remain long equities!

And it is that irony and paradox that makes me absolutely LOVE my job!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marko Papic

Marko Papic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Geo_papic

Aug 1
Canada and Mexico won the trade war. Hear me out... A very short 🧵.

By the time USMCA is up for renegotiations, the White House will have suffered such a huge backlash against de-globalization (which nobody in the US actually wants) that the USMCA loophole will be ossified.
At that point, only Mexico and Canada will have 0% tariff access to the US market, which will attract an enormous investment boom in both countries as other exporters surge investments to gain access of the US market.
I suspect that Prime Minister Carney understands some of this dynamic. Which is why he is standing firm and stoic in the face of the 35% tariff on Canada. Which, without USMCA renegotiations, is kind of silly anywhow. This is a good strategy.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 16
Markets appear to be FADING Iran-Israel conflict today. Many commentators equate that with the "end of the war." I don't necessarily agree with that. Kinetic action by both sides could continue for months and even years. But markets could learn to ignore it.
Take the Iran-Iraq war from 1980-1988. It is not that much different from current tensions between Israel and Iran. The entire West - including the US and France - essentially propped up Saddam Hussein in that conflict.
Somewhat ironically, Israel offered support to Iran during the conflict. But the reality was that Iran largely felt isolated, with much of the world throwing its weight behind Iraq.
Read 10 tweets
May 13
I think that the @WhiteHouse should print out these charts and send to @realDonaldTrump. It's very simple. They explain why the pivot away from wanton trade war is political obvious.
In my view, President Trump did not "capitulate." He responded to material constraints. It's actually funny to see all these liberal critics of President Trump who also happen to be bearish. They're melting down. But why? If the trade war doesn't make sense in the first place, should Trump not be praised for pivoting out of it?
So why the pivot? Yes, of course... The bond market matters. As does retaliation against US interests. A multipolar global distribution of power is also a constraint. All of these are fine reasons to be rational. But the ultimate constraint on President Trump are the voters.
Read 22 tweets
Feb 20
I am in Europe right now. Many friends and clients over here are buying into the narrative that Europe is being "sidelined" by the US in its negotiations with Russia.

I see it differently.
Every time Europe made a deal with Russia - for example, the Minsk agreements - the US undermined it. It is not a secret that the US encouraged Kyiv to essentially ignore that deal, which ended the 2014-2015 conflict.
But wait... the Minsk agreement was not in Ukraine's interest. Fair, but neither is the current conflict! The US encouraged Ukraine to push against the Europe-negotiated solution and then did not put strong enough of security guarnatees to protect it from Russia.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 9
Some thoughts on the LA fires, given the curious situation that I find myself in... being in the midst of a macro calamity.

To be clear, I don't believe in "reports from the ground." they are often actually the least sober. Least useful. So... a cautious and modest 🧵.
First, we now have the first reports of the size of the "Palisades fire." See below. Image
It is effectively as large as West LA - population around 200,000 - itself. However, the prevailing winds have taken the fire to the southwest, as they normally do. As such, the fire has stopped along Rustic and Santa Monica Canyons that separate SM from Pacific Palisades.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 4
Looking for some early January weekend reading? Highly recommend this @SteveMiran piece from two months ago on restructuring global trade architecture.

hudsonbaycapital.com/documents/FG/h…
It is very good! I have 10 thoughts on the report.

1) What does the US do about Chinese "enemy shoring" around the world? Is the US prepared to raise tariffs to 60% against even geopolitical allies that Chinese companies use as transit exporters?
2) Currency offsets on tariffs. Yes, USD rose in 2018/2019. (I disagree this was because of tariffs, but that is neither here nor there). The bigger question is how would that aid US manufacturing? Unless the US imposes very high tariffs on all trade partners.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(