Kurt Mahlburg Profile picture
Sep 4 23 tweets 6 min read Read on X
In 1975, Australia’s taxpayer-funded ABC gave pedophiles a national stage to brag about abusing children.

For 42 mins, predators laughed, boasted and normalised their crimes.

Then @abcnews buried the tape — and lied to Parliament about it.

Let's blow this scandal wide open 🧵 Image
Image
The recording still exists.

John Adams (@adamseconomics) has heard it.

But ordinary Australians are forbidden to.

The ABC has locked the tape away, issued gag orders, and deceived our elected representatives to keep its darkest secret hidden.

Here’s the truth👇
On 14 July 1975, Lateline aired an “interview” with four men and a teenage boy.

For nearly an hour, they admitted to:

• Grooming children with gifts
• Targeting broken families
• Lurking near schools for victims
• Abusing toddlers

And they laughed about it.
The host himself, Richard Neville, openly admitted to being a pederast.

Instead of exposing predators, he gave them a platform — joking and laughing alongside men who described how they groomed and abused boys.

This was broadcast on national radio. Image
One man bragged about keeping up to 12 boys “on rotation.”

Another said 12-year-olds could give “rational consent” to sex with men decades older.

ABC chairman Richard Downing, defended it publicly:

“In general, men will sleep with young boys... the community ought to know.” Image
Image
This isn’t some dark conspiracy theory.

The broadcast is so infamous it has its own dedicated Wikipedia page.

This was a real ABC production, aired nationally, defended by its chairman, and condemned in Parliament and the press. Image
Not everyone stayed silent about it.

The Rev Fred Nile filed a police complaint immediately after the broadcast and publicly condemned the ABC for platforming predators.

A newspaper clipping from the time records his warning: this was corruption of children, not “education.” Image
Fred Nile was right. This was perversion posing as journalism.

It was the normalisation of child exploitation — funded by the public purse.

And instead of reckoning with that disgrace, the ABC has spent decades concealing it.
In 2023, Adams obtained the 1975 tape from ABC archives.

But he was forced to sign a contract banning him from publishing or sharing it “by any means, including social media.”

Translation: you can’t hear it.

Not unless the ABC chooses to release it.
Worse still:

In 2018, Senator Eric Abetz asked the ABC in a parliamentary hearing about the 1975 broadcast.

The ABC’s official written reply?

“The ABC has no records of the interview.”

That was an outright lie. Image
Five years later, Adams held the tape in his hands.

The ABC knew it existed.

They misled the Senate.

And when the ABC lies to Parliament, it lies to the people of Australia.
Senator Abetz' had made prior attempts at holding the ABC accountable.

In 2016, he asked if the ABC would apologise for the 1975 broadcast.

They refused.

The official reply? It was a “legitimate news item” consistent with editorial standards.

That response speaks volumes.
Why does this matter in 2025?

Because:

• The tape includes admissions of serious crimes.
• Suppression insults survivors of abuse.
• Deception of Parliament erodes democratic accountability.
• Similar scandals continue in politics and childcare today.
The law provides a remedy.

Section 78A of the ABC Act empowers the Communications Minister to direct the ABC to release material in the national interest.

If ever there was a case for that power, it is this one.

The truth must be heard.
Australians can demand accountability.

Contact Communications Minister Annika Wells (@AnikaWells) at:

minister.wells@mo.communications.gov.au

Write to your local MP and senators.

Tell them: the ABC must release the 1975 recording. Image
Releasing the 1975 recording would:

• Expose how predators justified abuse
• Equip the public to recognise such rhetoric today
• Confront the ABC’s past corruption
• Show Parliament’s oversight still matters

Silence protects institutions, not children.
For nearly 50 years, the ABC has carried this shame:

First it defended it.
Then it suppressed it.
Then it lied about it.

That cannot be allowed to continue.
Australians deserve to hear this tape. Accountability demands it.

If the ABC refuses, the Minister must compel it.

The time for secrecy is over.
Children’s safety is not negotiable.

The ABC’s darkest secret must be dragged — kicking and screaming if necessary — into the light.

J ustice and truth are never served by silence.

Will Australia confront this? Or will another generation be denied the truth?
Read John Adams' full report here:

richardsonpost.com/john-adams/405…
If you're sick of corruption at the ABC, share the top post in this thread:

A big thanks to The Richardson Post for allowing republication at @TheCanDec:

dailydeclaration.org.au/2025/09/05/abc…
@TheCanDec Take a stand for freedom, faith, family and life. Read and sign the Canberra Declaration today: .canberradeclaration.org.au/join-us/read-d…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Mahlburg

Kurt Mahlburg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @k_mahlburg

Aug 27
Truth is a now crime in Australia.

A NSW court just ruled that calling a male-born soccer player a “man” counts as unlawful vilification.

Speaking biological facts can now cost you up to $200,000.

Learn about the latest legal blow for women’s advocate Kirralie Smith. 🧵 Image
Image
On Tuesday, Kirralie was found guilty under NSW anti-discrimination laws for referring to 2 male-born soccer players as men.

Her “offence”?

Criticising their involvement in female sporting leagues.

The consequences for Kirralie could be severe.
Penalties the court may impose:

• Up to $200,000 in fines
• Public apologies
• Mandatory re-education to affirm that men can become women

Fail to comply will result in further penalties.

Welcome to the world of compelled speech.
Read 15 tweets
Aug 15
In Australia, a woman has just lost her appeal against a 2-year court order for “violence.”

Her crime?

Posting a photo of a "trans woman" that was already available publicly — and asking:

“Why are males playing in female soccer teams?”

This is the story of Kirralie Smith 🧵 Image
Image
Kirralie @KirralieS is an advocate for women’s sport.

She’s never met the player in question.
Never threatened them.
Never named them.

She used a public image to highlight the obvious:

If males can compete in female divisions, the categories mean nothing.
When police arrived at her home, Kirralie says she was “outraged” and “in disbelief.”

“I could not believe that this was happening… that it’s considered a potentially illegal action to advocate for women’s spaces.” Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 14
Five-year-olds in Victorian schools are now taught that their body parts may not match their gender.

Premier Jacinta Allan has blasted one mother's concerns over the curriculum as “disgraceful nonsense.”

But what she left unsaid should alarm every parent 🧵 Image
Image
The program is called Respectful Relationships.

It now includes lessons telling prep students that “some people didn’t get a good match for their body parts.”

And real case studies that normalise a boy joining a girls’ team — at age 5.
When asked about concerns over a “school-to-clinic pipeline,” Premier Jacinta Allan called it “disgraceful nonsense.”

Her defence?

That "trans kids" are “15 times more likely to kill themselves” — so the program must go on.

But the data tells a different story.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 5
Australia's Governor-General is meant to be neutral.

So why is Sam Mostyn patron of an activist group that just scored a huge tax perk from Labor?

...right in time for Tickle v Giggle?

A thread on political favours, gender ideology and a $4.5M scandal the media won't touch 🧵 Image
Equality Australia — a radical advocacy group hawking gender ideology — was repeatedly denied charity status by courts and regulators.

Then the Albanese government quietly approved it.

And handed them a $4.5 million tax perk.

Right after Mostyn became their patron.
This happened after the charity regulator ruled that Equality Australia does not serve a “benevolent” purpose.

Equality Australia's real aim?

Agitating for social change — not relief to those in need.

The AAT and Full Federal Court agreed.
Three rulings.
All ignored.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 3
🇬🇧 Britain wasn’t always Christian ✝️

It was won — from paganism to Christ — through hardship, holy fire, and missionary grit.

We must learn from those who carried the torch.

Because as the gospel fades in our day...

Britain may need to be reached again 🧵 Image
Before churches dotted the British Isles, paganism held strong.

Rome’s conquest in AD 43 cracked open the door to the gospel —

but it was everyday, Spirit-filled men, not emperors, who first brought the good news of Jesus. Image
Christian merchants, soldiers, and settlers entered Roman Britain.

Minorities, yes — but bold in witness.

By the 4th century, bishops were appointed, churches were planted, and cities like London and York became gospel outposts. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jul 29
🚨 Australia's welfare system is paying up to $22,754 to women who abort their babies after 20 weeks.

This has now been confirmed IN WRITING —

from the desk of the Senator who oversees the payments (Centrelink).

Critics called this fake news.

But now we have the receipts 🧵 Image
A letter from Senator Katy Gallagher’s office —

who serves in the Prime Minister's cabinet as the Minister for Women and Government Services —

confirms that late-term "intentional abortions" are eligible for taxpayer-funded payments.

This is official policy from Canberra. Image
The letter explains:

“The eligibility criteria… do not exclude… medical termination, including an intentional abortion.”

The Stillborn Baby Payment — which was designed for grieving mothers — is being extended to those who choose to end a child’s life after 20 weeks. Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(