Geoengineering Info Profile picture
Sep 5, 2025 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🚨New study finds #SolarGeoengineering methods have divergent hydrological outcomes in China.

Only equatorial Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (#SAI) could mitigate the “North-Drought, South-Flood” pattern, while MCB & CCT risk worsening it.

DETAILS🧵1/11 Image
2/ China’s hydroclimate is long shaped by the NDSF pattern: aridity in the north, flooding in the south.

Warming threatens to intensify this divide via glacier retreat and stronger monsoon variability.

How would climate interventions alter this? Image
3/ Zhang et al. tested three SRM strategies:

• SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection)
• MCB (Marine Cloud Brightening)
• CCT (Cirrus Cloud Thinning)

All benchmarked against high-emissions (RCP8.5) & moderate mitigation (RCP4.5).
4/ Results revealed that all #ClimateIntervention strategies achieved comparable global cooling, but their regional hydrological effects differed sharply.
5/ SAI → increased precipitation / surface runoff in the north, decreased in the south → mitigates NDSF.

MCB → raised southern flood risk.

CCT → deepened northern drought.

RCP4.5 → reduced southern floods but worsens northern dryness. Image
6/ Why SAI works differently?

It reduces inter-hemispheric & equator-to-pole temperature gradients.

This weakens & shifts the East Asian summer monsoon northward.

Result: more rainfall in northern China, less in the south. Image
7/ The mechanism observed in this study is consistent with observed circulation & rainfall anomalies following the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption, which is "a rare real-world analogue of equatorial aerosol injection." Image
8/ When considering extremes, SAI again showed relative promise:

It reduced the frequency of major southern floods (10–20 yr recurrence) while keeping northern drought risks comparatively stable.

By contrast, MCB and CCT each exacerbate opposite hazards Image
9/ Circulation analysis shows SAI also weakens the Hadley cell, shifts the East Asian subtropical westerly jet poleward, and moves the Western Pacific subtropical high northward.

Together, these adjustments steer summer rainfall into northern China. Image
10/ By contrast, MCB brightens low marine clouds, creating zonal asymmetries that strengthen southern rainfall

CCT reduces cirrus cover, which dries out the upper troposphere & suppresses northern precipitation

Thus, both strategies worsen NDSF divide rather than mitigate it
📝For more details, read the study entitled "Divergent impacts of climate interventions on China’s north-south water divide" here:


🧵11/11

#SAI #MCB #CCT #Geoengineeringnature.com/articles/s4324…
"unroll" @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Geoengineering Info

Geoengineering Info Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @geoengineering1

Feb 6
🚨🗞️Monthly #SolarGeoengineering Updates (Jan 2026)🗞️🚨

From U.S. withdrawal from global climate bodies & anti-geoengineering bills, to SAI uncertainty tool, Arctic field trials & funding calls, SRM stayed at the nexus of sci & geopolitics.

Top 10 SRM Highlights (Jan'26)🧵1/11 Image
1️⃣ 𝗨.𝗦. 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗨𝗡𝗙𝗖𝗖𝗖 & 𝗜𝗣𝗖𝗖 - Experts warn withdrawal could weaken SRM governance, deepen geopolitical mistrust, and accelerate fragmented or unilateral approaches.

2/11 Image
2️⃣ 𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗶-𝗴𝗲𝗼𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨.𝗦. - New Arizona and Iowa state proposals target geoengineering, despite limited evidence and no active SRM programs.

3/11 Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 5
🚨Climate pathways to 1.5°C increasingly depend on land-intensive carbon dioxide removal (#CDR) like forestation and BECCS.

But new research shows these climate solutions could place major pressure on #biodiversity if deployed without safeguards.

Details🧵1/11 Image
2/ Using five integrated assessment models, the study examines where large-scale CDR is projected to occur & and how often it overlaps with biodiversity hotspots and climate refugia, the places most critical for species survival. Image
3/ The analysis focuses on a moderate but realistic deployment level of 6 GtCO₂ per year:
• 3 GtCO₂/yr from forestation
• 3 GtCO₂/yr from BECCS
Even at this level, land pressures are already significant.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 30
🚨The Politics of Geoengineering (book) is out, offering 1st comprehensive social science view of #geoengineering.

It examines political, legal, economic & societal dimensions of CDR & SRM, from Africa to the Asia-Pacific, amid urgent governance & ethical debates

Chapters🧵1/15 Image
2/ Chapter 01: Geoengineering has shifted from theory to contested policy, with technology outpacing governance. The analysis highlights political, legal, economic, and justice dimensions and calls for urgent global oversight.

link.springer.com/chapter/10.100…Image
3/ Chapter 2 examines Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) as geoengineering, analyzing CO2 extraction, storage, and conversion, with SWOT insights on techniques and implications for sustainable climate action.

link.springer.com/chapter/10.100…Image
Read 16 tweets
Jan 21
🚨Is carbon dioxide removal (#CDR) in the Arctic really feasible?

A new peer-reviewed study systematically assessed proposed Arctic CDR pathways and finds that feasibility is far more limited than often assumed.

DETAILS🧵1/14 Image
2/ As Arctic warms rapidly (4x) & attracts attention for climate interventions, can it host CDR at meaningful scale?

To answer this, authors conducted a comparative assessment of major CDR approaches proposed for Arctic regions, spanning both nature-based & engineered methods. Image
3/ The analysis draws on existing empirical studies, pilot projects, and modeling literature, evaluating each CDR pathway against biophysical constraints, technical readiness, environmental risks, and governance requirements. Image
Read 15 tweets
Jan 15
🚨2025 Year in Review: Solar Geoengineering Edition🚨

As we enter 2026, we’re excited to share our yearly summary for #SRM: "Solar Geoengineering in 2025: Rays of Hope, Clouds of Doubt."

Here’s what we cover in this comprehensive review:🧵1/11 Image
2/ 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭’𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝟐𝟎𝟐5 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰?
1️⃣ Rising Temp & Escalating Climate Impacts
2️⃣SRM Funding Announcements
3️⃣Top SRM Stories
4️⃣Restrictions & Bans on SRM
5️⃣Essential SRM Reads
6️⃣SRM in Media
7️⃣Research Highlights
8️⃣Our Work Across Geoengineering Image
3/ 2025 was the third-warmest yr on record. @CopernicusEU shows the last 11 yrs were the warmest ever, with the global average temp in yrs 2023-25 exceeding 1.5 °C. Top climate disasters caused $120B+ in losses, intensifying debates over mitigation, CDR & SRM. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 8
🚨Oceans struggle to absorb Earth's carbon dioxide as microplastics invade their waters, a new study finds.

#CarbonSink #CDR #CarbonSequestration

DETAILS🧵1/12 Image
2/ The ocean is Earth’s largest carbon sink, absorbing vast amounts of CO₂ from the atmosphere.

But tiny plastic particles under 5 mm (microplastics) are now everywhere, from deep sea to Arctic ice, disrupting this natural system. Image
3/ When microplastics enter the ocean, they interact with phytoplankton, the microscopic plants that absorb atm CO₂ through photosynthesis.

Even tiny plastic particles can shade, stress, or damage these organisms, reducing their growth and carbon-fixing ability. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(