there's always the question of who is sincerely principled and who will always find an excuse for the principle to not apply to their enemies. a lot of the time it's a bitter lesson that most are hypocrites. but I gotta hand it to the gun people: they're principled.
the states' rights people are not very principled, I have seen literally none of them turn out to say that blue states should not be subject to mass yanking of federal funds for failing to fall in line.
the free speech people have a complicated track record. the ACLU turned from its mission of defending the worst people on principled grounds. FIRE's still at it. a lot of their supporters were furious with them for it, though.
but the gun people? the gun organizations uniformly in the strongest possible terms said "no gun bans" and I've seen dozens of independent 2A people say the same thing, in very clear terms, while being otherwise very anti-trans.
it warms my heart and it absolutely makes me care more about their cause and their policy priorities.
you said you wanted the guns to defend against tyranny, and when tyranny showed up to bully someone other than you, you said 'they should have guns too.' you win this round. send me a list of your legislative priorities.
@TheLastNeocon but I think with guns the case is in fact stronger, since their argument is "we want guns to protect against tyranny" and for this argument to go through you have to believe they will in fact stand up against tyranny
@TheLastNeocon @plaiceholder374 obviously we do not live in a world where an organized citizens' militia can fight the army fair and square. I don't think anyone was claiming that we did.
@Mithrandir48 @plaiceholder374 he should not have been arrested for it, though anyone who violently assaults another person in the restroom because of suspecting they're trans should absolutely be arrested because assaulting people is bad
@DeepWithARifle They did this because history had given them a deep and correct suspicion of government power, and because they wanted the American people to be a free people.
@DeepWithARifle They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, and their country became the wealthiest and most powerful place in the world. Its people have done things no other people even tried.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a common right wing talking point that the 'official story' we were 'all taught in school' was that white Americans moved to the suburbs because they were racist. Except that's...not what we were taught in school at all.
Now, my own school always ended up behind the ball and never got much past World War II in history class - just a quick "and then there was the civil rights act and the moon landing and the Vietnam War and Watergate have a great summer, kids". But l looked up my old textbook -
- to see what it would have said about white flight to the suburbs if the class had gotten that far. here it is:
If the city code prohibits this the city code needs to be edited!!! The state of California's daycare abundance law prohibits cities from imposing zoning requirements for the home care of 14 or fewer children, which the state declared a 'residential' use of space.
This is one of California's best laws and other states should imitate it! Declaring home care of children a 'residential' use of land stops municipalities and disgruntled neighbors from blocking home care centers, which make childcare affordable to far more families.
Because home microschools are a new (mostly post-Covid) phenomenon, cities are often unsure how to classify them, and the Zuckerbergs may need to register as a home care provider. But home private schools are LEGAL in the state of California.
I'm grateful to Jeremy Lewin for appearing on Ross Douthat's podcast to talk about how he sees the future of foreign aid, and I am glad to hear that he doesn't approve of the wholesale destruction of PEPFAR. But he makes a bunch of false claims I want to address:
This is false. PEPFAR is not a program whose appropriations have grown over time, leading to extra and frivolous spending. PEPFAR spending in nominal terms has been the same since 2009, so in real terms it has decreased a lot.
it is apparently an article of faith in some circles that Biden could have stopped the Israeli invasion of Gaza at any point with 'one phone call'. seems false! when pressed on this, it turns out the proposed one phone call is... a threat of an American ground invasion of Israel
'we could stop the Israeli invasion of Gaza by ourselves invading a nuclear power' is I guess, in some sense, a true claim about the world, but I do not think it is usefully simplified to 'with one phone call'.
Israel should not be in Gaza. Netanyahu has no plan. He does not care about the lives of anyone there and is not achieving any conceivable legitimate war goal.
@CJHandmer @meilaoban I looked into this in a lot of depth. I am happy to discuss it with you. I understand distrust for the mainstream media. I ended up trying to get a lot of information directly from clinics to get as much clarity as possible.
@CJHandmer @meilaoban But let's take one specific program which DOGE suspended grants for, which it has been reported that Farritor and Kliger made the key decisions on personally: the 700,000 people receiving preventative HIV medication.
@CJHandmer @meilaoban Most recipients of preventative HIV medication were women whose husbands had HIV but who hadn't contracted it yet, or pregnant women with HIV trying to prevent their babies from contracting it. If that medication stops, they are immediately vulnerable for HIV.
I evaluate the people who cut off payments for ongoing contracts for PEPFAR, etc. through DOGE the same way I evaluate the people who kept finding side routes to fund gain of function research on pandemic-potential coronaviruses after Obama imposed a freeze.
I know in both cases that they thought they were doing the right thing (the high-agency thing!). In both cases the responsible parties were by all accounts smart, kind, capable, generally admirable people dedicated to human progress and science and many things I care about.
Also, you know, the DOGE cuts directly caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands, likely millions, of people, and the GOF research may well have.
Note that I am not saying 'therefore we had to do Gavi and PEPFAR and all USAID programs forever and anyone who ended them is up there with Mao and Stalin and Hitler'. That basically doesn't work as a lens of analysis - we have to declare all the other countries as bad as Mao for not being as good as America, and at that point it's hardly a productive lens. (I do think that this is an important reason America is the best country, but I try to avoid the overheated framings of this fact.)
The thing that DOGE did that killed so many people was to cut off medication and communications overnight IN THE ABSENCE OF any decision by our elected leaders about the future of these programs. Congress and the President could have lawfully shuttered those programs while paying for work already done, and I expect that would have killed wildly fewer people (still a lot of people, of course). But importantly, that is not at all what happened. (It's kind of fascinating how fast this particular history was rewritten.) A lot of the unnecessary deaths that have occurred so far are a product of the fact that aid was frozen - food rotted - drugs didn't reach their destinations - not as a result of a lawful congressional or executive process, but due to random ideologues finding a workaround to get a result they wanted, which involved using computer system access to circumvent the real process, including cancelling payments for work that had already been completed.
And because this is how it happened, it was impossible to even learn what had been cancelled and it was much much harder for private charity to take up the torch. I would know - I spent a ton of time trying to figure out how I could spend my own dollars to keep the best programs going. The answer was that I couldn't because DOGE was acting totally unpredictably, ignoring the government's preexisting commitments, not being honest about what was happening, and seesawing wildly with respect to which things were cancelled.
So the fair comparison here is to a world where Trump chose to end those programs but their end did not happen through DOGE bureaucrats blocking payments and kicking people out of email accounts. That much blood is directly on DOGE's hands; the future of the global war on child death and infectious disease is a policy debate we should settle through normal policy debate mechanisms.