When do Indology scholars estimate Rigved was composed?
The Rigveda, the oldest of the Vedas, has been dated anywhere from the timeless to the early Iron Age. Unlike the Mahabharata, it lacks a clear historical anchor, so its age has been debated through astronomy, archaeology, linguistics, and tradition.
Hindu orthodoxy treats the Vedas as apauruṣeya, eternal revelations. Dayanand Sarasvati insisted they were created at the dawn of each cosmic cycle, most recently in 3102 BCE, making historical dating irrelevant.
Others push the hymns into deep prehistory. Nilesh Oak uses star positions to argue for skies as old as 22,000 BCE, with strong fits around 6000–5000 BCE. Sudhir Bhargava, using Puranic genealogies, places the Rigveda at 8000 BCE, while Subhash Kak links it to the Indus–Sarasvati civilization (7000–3000 BCE). David Frawley, too, interprets astronomical markers as proof of a long growth stretching from before 6000 down to 2000 BCE.
Late nineteenth century scholars also turned to the sky. Bal Gangadhar Tilak’s The Orion dated the hymns to about 4500 BCE, while his later Arctic Home in the Vedas imagined Aryans at the pole. Hermann Jacobi suggested 3500–2500 BCE and P. C. Sengupta even tied a hymn to a specific eclipse on 26 July 3928 BCE.
Archaeology places the text closer to the Bronze Age. B. B. Lal argued that the Rigveda must predate the drying of the Sarasvati river (c. 2000 BCE), making it contemporary with Harappan civilization (2600–1900 BCE).
Most Western scholars, however, cluster in the second millennium. Max Müller suggested 1200 BCE as a minimum, admitting it was guesswork. Thomas Oberlies pushed the oldest hymns to around 1700 BCE and the youngest to 1100 BCE. Michael Witzel tied the text to Indo-Aryan clans between 1500 and 1200 BCE, with compilation around 1000 BCE. David Anthony linked Rigvedic culture to steppe migrations and the spread of horses and chariots around 1500 BCE. Romila Thapar situates it between 1500 and 1000 BCE, after Harappan decline and during the rise of early pastoral polities.
Genetics has recently reinforced this consensus. The study by Narasimhan et al. (2019) shows steppe ancestry entering South Asia between 1900 and 1500 BCE, suggesting the Rigveda was composed after these migrations.
Across this wide range, the Rigveda becomes a mirror of scholarly perspective: eternal revelation, Ice Age astronomy, Harappan continuity, or Indo-European migration. The debate is less about one date than about the very story scholars choose to tell of India’s beginnings.
Sources:
Dayanand Sarasvati, Satyarth Prakash (1875).
Bal Gangadhar Tilak, The Orion (1893); The Arctic Home in the Vedas (1903).
P. C. Sengupta, Ancient Indian Chronology (1947).
Subhash Kak, The Astronomical Code of the Rigveda (1994).
David Frawley, Gods, Sages and Kings (1991).
Nilesh Oak, When Did the Mahabharata War Happen? (2011).
B. B. Lal, The Rigvedic People (2002).
Thomas Oberlies, Die Religion des Rgveda (1998).
Michael Witzel, “Early Sanskritization: Origins and Development of the Kuru State” (1995).
David Anthony, The Horse, the Wheel, and Language (2007).
Romila Thapar, Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300 (2002).
V. Narasimhan et al., “The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia,” Science 365, 2019.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Rigveda comprises 1,028 hymns organized into 10 books. Scholarly consensus holds that these books were not composed in their current numerical sequence.
In this thread, we explore the chronology proposed by Shrikant Talageri for the 10 Mandalas of the Rigveda.
Dr. Talageri proposes that chronologically based on internal structure and geneologic data, the temporal order for the mandalas is
6→3→7→4→2→5→8→9→10, with Book 1 containing material from multiple periods.
This chronology is established through several criteria: linguistic features, metrical patterns, ritual development, and geographical references.
The geographical data proves particularly revealing, showing a consistent pattern of expanding knowledge from eastern to western regions (proving the Out of India theory according to Dr. Talageri)
Who supported whom in the Mahabharata War?
We mapped every kingdom mentioned in the Mahabharata based on ancient texts and modern scholarship to answer one burning question:
Did your ancestors fight for the Pandavas or the Kauravas? [Thread]
The Mahabharata wasn’t just a family feud.
It was a pan-Indian conflict, drawing in tribes from Persia to Assam, Sri Lanka to the Himalayas. This war was for all purpose and intents a world war of that time. ⚔️🌏
Using the Kisari Mohan Ganguli translation and 7+ scholarly sources, we tracked down every kingdom’s role in the war.
🟠 Kauravas
🟢 Pandavas
🟡 Both
🔵 Neither
🔥 Kaurava coalition:
The northwest, Gangetic core, and some eastern powers.
Think: elite Vedic clans, early Indo-Aryan migrants, conservative powers.
Key allies:
Gandhara (Shakuni)
Kalinga
Sindhu (Jayadratha)
Madra (Shalya)
Kambojas, Sakas, Yavanas
How is Ganesha represented in countries beyond India - a thread
According to Adi Shankaracharya, like the Shaiva, Vaishnava and Shakta tradition in India, there also was a Ganapatya tradition. In this branch of Hinduism, people knew God through Ganesha.
After Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the Peshwas came to power in Maharashtra and were mainly responsible for the popularity of Ganesha worship as their ishta-dev. While Ganesha is mentioned in the Vedas, it was Puranic times when the deity gained popularity.
Let's discuss how the infamous Lollypop Lagelu lady impacted widespread regions of Bihar and some districts of neighbouring UP and Jharkhand to sway and shake.
As we all know, the region most impacted was Aarah - which isn't technically a district. It is part of the Bhojpur district.
As the line goes - तू लगवेलु जब लिपिस्टिक लगवेलु हिलेला आरा डिस्टिक, the region is said to 'shake' when the lady applies lipstick.
The next pair of regions that fall victim to the lady are the districts of neighbouring states - Ballia from UP and far away from the impact region - Jamshedpur (Tatangar)
गालिया प बलिया झूमे मुस्की प टाटा
The lady's cheeks claim Ballia, and her smile claims Tatanagar.
There are over 1000 varieties of mangoes in India. Less than 20 are grown commercially. The World's 36% of mangoes are produced in India [18 million tonnes]. Second, on the list, China only produces 4 million tonnes.
Despite being the highest producer in the world, the share of Indian mangoes in global mango trade is less than 3% - that too in the canned form. The share of fresh mangoes exports is negligible for India.