RIP Charlie Kirk
Who benefited?
Public Fallouts Between Charlie Kirk and Jewish or Zionist Associates
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), has positioned himself as a strong supporter of Israel and a defender against antisemitism, often aligning with evangelical Christian Zionism. However, he has faced multiple public controversies and fallouts with Jewish individuals, organizations, and Zionist allies, primarily stemming from his remarks echoing antisemitic tropes, platforming controversial figures, and defending phrases or individuals seen as hostile to Jewish interests. These incidents have drawn criticism from groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), pro-Israel conservatives, and Jewish media outlets, accusing him of pandering to white nationalist elements within the right-wing while relying on Jewish donors for funding. Below is a chronological deep dive into the key public fallouts, based on reported statements, social media backlash, and media coverage. Note that Kirk has repeatedly denied antisemitism, calling it a “lie from the pit of Hell” in April 2025, but the tensions highlight fractures in conservative alliances.
Who benefited?
Public Fallouts Between Charlie Kirk and Jewish or Zionist Associates
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), has positioned himself as a strong supporter of Israel and a defender against antisemitism, often aligning with evangelical Christian Zionism. However, he has faced multiple public controversies and fallouts with Jewish individuals, organizations, and Zionist allies, primarily stemming from his remarks echoing antisemitic tropes, platforming controversial figures, and defending phrases or individuals seen as hostile to Jewish interests. These incidents have drawn criticism from groups like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), pro-Israel conservatives, and Jewish media outlets, accusing him of pandering to white nationalist elements within the right-wing while relying on Jewish donors for funding. Below is a chronological deep dive into the key public fallouts, based on reported statements, social media backlash, and media coverage. Note that Kirk has repeatedly denied antisemitism, calling it a “lie from the pit of Hell” in April 2025, but the tensions highlight fractures in conservative alliances.
1. Antisemitic Tropes and Attacks on Jewish Donors During the Israel-Hamas War (October–November 2023)
Kirk’s radio show and X posts amid the early stages of the Israel-Hamas conflict led to widespread accusations of promoting antisemitic stereotypes, particularly blaming Jewish influence for campus unrest and cultural shifts. This created fallout with Jewish advocacy groups and donors, who viewed his rhetoric as scapegoating Jews for broader societal issues.
• Key Remarks and Backlash:
• On October 13, 2023, Kirk blamed “elite Jewish culture” and “secular” Jewish donors for funding universities that “breed Jew hatred,” suggesting they had turned a “blind eye” to antisemitism on campuses.
• On October 26, 2023, he claimed Jewish people control “not just the colleges; it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it,” and identified “Jewish donors” as the primary funders of “radical” policies. He also performed an antisemitic impression of a Jewish protester at Cooper Union and generalized about “American Jewish society” overcompensating with donations to be liked.
• On November 7, 2023, Kirk explicitly blamed “Jewish dollars” for funding “Cultural Marxist ideas,” a classic antisemitic trope implying Jewish orchestration of societal decay.
• He named specific Jewish donors (e.g., on X posts from October 17 and 26, 2023) as culprits for campus antisemitism, escalating personal attacks.
• Fallout with Associates:
• The ADL and Jewish media outlets like Media Matters condemned Kirk for reviving conspiracy theories about Jewish control of institutions, leading to calls for boycotts of TPUSA events. This strained relationships with pro-Israel donors, some of whom had previously funded TPUSA (e.g., Bernie Marcus of the Marcus Foundation).
• Within conservative circles, Jewish commentators like Ben Shapiro (a Zionist ally and Daily Wire co-founder) distanced themselves indirectly, as Kirk’s rhetoric overlapped with far-right figures like Nick Fuentes, whom Shapiro has publicly feuded with. Kirk’s defense of these tropes alienated Zionist networks that rely on unified right-wing support for Israel.
• Impact: These comments contributed to a broader 2023–2024 scrutiny of TPUSA’s ties to racism and antisemitism, with Jewish groups pressuring Republican leaders to disavow Kirk ahead of the 2024 RNC, where he spoke despite the backlash.
Kirk’s radio show and X posts amid the early stages of the Israel-Hamas conflict led to widespread accusations of promoting antisemitic stereotypes, particularly blaming Jewish influence for campus unrest and cultural shifts. This created fallout with Jewish advocacy groups and donors, who viewed his rhetoric as scapegoating Jews for broader societal issues.
• Key Remarks and Backlash:
• On October 13, 2023, Kirk blamed “elite Jewish culture” and “secular” Jewish donors for funding universities that “breed Jew hatred,” suggesting they had turned a “blind eye” to antisemitism on campuses.
• On October 26, 2023, he claimed Jewish people control “not just the colleges; it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it,” and identified “Jewish donors” as the primary funders of “radical” policies. He also performed an antisemitic impression of a Jewish protester at Cooper Union and generalized about “American Jewish society” overcompensating with donations to be liked.
• On November 7, 2023, Kirk explicitly blamed “Jewish dollars” for funding “Cultural Marxist ideas,” a classic antisemitic trope implying Jewish orchestration of societal decay.
• He named specific Jewish donors (e.g., on X posts from October 17 and 26, 2023) as culprits for campus antisemitism, escalating personal attacks.
• Fallout with Associates:
• The ADL and Jewish media outlets like Media Matters condemned Kirk for reviving conspiracy theories about Jewish control of institutions, leading to calls for boycotts of TPUSA events. This strained relationships with pro-Israel donors, some of whom had previously funded TPUSA (e.g., Bernie Marcus of the Marcus Foundation).
• Within conservative circles, Jewish commentators like Ben Shapiro (a Zionist ally and Daily Wire co-founder) distanced themselves indirectly, as Kirk’s rhetoric overlapped with far-right figures like Nick Fuentes, whom Shapiro has publicly feuded with. Kirk’s defense of these tropes alienated Zionist networks that rely on unified right-wing support for Israel.
• Impact: These comments contributed to a broader 2023–2024 scrutiny of TPUSA’s ties to racism and antisemitism, with Jewish groups pressuring Republican leaders to disavow Kirk ahead of the 2024 RNC, where he spoke despite the backlash.
2. Endorsement of “Dialectical Hatred” Claim Against Jewish Communities (November 2023)
Kirk amplified a controversial narrative blaming Jewish groups for anti-white sentiment, leading to direct rebukes from Jewish organizations and warnings of inciting violence.
• Key Incident:
• On his podcast in November 2023, Kirk endorsed an X post by Elon Musk (who has Jewish associates but has faced his own antisemitism accusations), claiming it was “largely true” that Jewish communities push “dialectical hatred against whites.” He cited the ADL and Jewish donors as backing “anti-white” initiatives like Black Lives Matter and critical race theory, while qualifying that “not all Jews” are involved.
• Fallout with Associates:
• The ADL publicly denounced Kirk, with CEO Jonathan Greenblatt calling the remarks a “dangerous escalation” that could lead to violence akin to Kristallnacht. This strained Kirk’s ties to Jewish advocacy groups he had previously courted for anti-antisemitism alliances.
• On X, Jewish users and commentators accused Kirk of “bipolar” behavior—defending Israel while promoting tropes historically used against Jews. One prominent critic, @ApotheosisJohn, labeled him a “Zionist shill” who prioritizes power over genuine allyship, highlighting tensions with evangelical Zionists who expect unwavering support without caveats.
• Pro-Israel conservatives, including some TPUSA donors, expressed private frustration, viewing it as undermining the GOP’s pro-Israel stance amid rising campus protests.
• Impact: The incident fueled media coverage in Jewish outlets like JFeed, portraying Kirk as unreliable and contributing to a rift with Zionist media figures who saw his comments as enabling far-right antisemitism.
Kirk amplified a controversial narrative blaming Jewish groups for anti-white sentiment, leading to direct rebukes from Jewish organizations and warnings of inciting violence.
• Key Incident:
• On his podcast in November 2023, Kirk endorsed an X post by Elon Musk (who has Jewish associates but has faced his own antisemitism accusations), claiming it was “largely true” that Jewish communities push “dialectical hatred against whites.” He cited the ADL and Jewish donors as backing “anti-white” initiatives like Black Lives Matter and critical race theory, while qualifying that “not all Jews” are involved.
• Fallout with Associates:
• The ADL publicly denounced Kirk, with CEO Jonathan Greenblatt calling the remarks a “dangerous escalation” that could lead to violence akin to Kristallnacht. This strained Kirk’s ties to Jewish advocacy groups he had previously courted for anti-antisemitism alliances.
• On X, Jewish users and commentators accused Kirk of “bipolar” behavior—defending Israel while promoting tropes historically used against Jews. One prominent critic, @ApotheosisJohn, labeled him a “Zionist shill” who prioritizes power over genuine allyship, highlighting tensions with evangelical Zionists who expect unwavering support without caveats.
• Pro-Israel conservatives, including some TPUSA donors, expressed private frustration, viewing it as undermining the GOP’s pro-Israel stance amid rising campus protests.
• Impact: The incident fueled media coverage in Jewish outlets like JFeed, portraying Kirk as unreliable and contributing to a rift with Zionist media figures who saw his comments as enabling far-right antisemitism.
3. “Christ is King” Controversy and Defense of Candace Owens (March–April 2024)
The phrase “Christ is King,” a Christian declaration, became weaponized in right-wing circles as a subtle jab at Jewish rejection of Jesus, leading to a major fallout when Kirk defended its use by former TPUSA associate Candace Owens against her Jewish boss, Ben Shapiro.
• Key Incident:
• In March 2024, Owens feuded with Shapiro over her antisemitic comments (e.g., calling Israel a “terrorist state” and defending Kanye West). Owens posted “Christ is King” in response, which Shapiro and others interpreted as antisemitic trolling, implying Jews are inferior for not accepting Christ. Kirk initially defended Owens on his show, saying the phrase is not inherently antisemitic and criticizing Shapiro for overreacting. He later clarified it depends on “context” but platformed Owens at TPUSA events.
• This echoed earlier TPUSA chants of “Christ is King” at events (e.g., 2022 America First gatherings), which Jewish observers saw as exclusionary.
• Fallout with Associates:
• Shapiro, a key Zionist voice and conservative influencer, publicly clashed with Owens, leading to her firing from The Daily Wire in March 2024. Kirk’s support drew indirect fire from Shapiro’s circle, with Jewish commentators accusing Kirk of enabling antisemitism to appeal to Christian nationalists.
• Zionist donors and pro-Israel groups pressured TPUSA, with X users (e.g., @DanaNawzarAli in September 2025) claiming the “Zionist crowd attacked Charlie Kirk a year ago during the controversy around ‘Christ is King’.” This led to internal conservative rifts, as seen in X posts criticizing Kirk for betraying Jewish allies.
• The ADL and Jewish media (e.g., New York Times op-eds) highlighted the phrase’s use by white nationalists like Nick Fuentes, whom Kirk has platformed, further alienating Zionist networks. Kirk’s evangelical base cheered, but it cost him credibility among Jewish conservatives.
• Impact: The feud amplified divisions on the right, with Kirk caught between Christian supremacists and Zionist allies. It contributed to Owens’ full break from TPUSA circles and ongoing X backlash, including accusations that Kirk is “owned by Jewish donors” yet “angers them” by platforming critics.
The phrase “Christ is King,” a Christian declaration, became weaponized in right-wing circles as a subtle jab at Jewish rejection of Jesus, leading to a major fallout when Kirk defended its use by former TPUSA associate Candace Owens against her Jewish boss, Ben Shapiro.
• Key Incident:
• In March 2024, Owens feuded with Shapiro over her antisemitic comments (e.g., calling Israel a “terrorist state” and defending Kanye West). Owens posted “Christ is King” in response, which Shapiro and others interpreted as antisemitic trolling, implying Jews are inferior for not accepting Christ. Kirk initially defended Owens on his show, saying the phrase is not inherently antisemitic and criticizing Shapiro for overreacting. He later clarified it depends on “context” but platformed Owens at TPUSA events.
• This echoed earlier TPUSA chants of “Christ is King” at events (e.g., 2022 America First gatherings), which Jewish observers saw as exclusionary.
• Fallout with Associates:
• Shapiro, a key Zionist voice and conservative influencer, publicly clashed with Owens, leading to her firing from The Daily Wire in March 2024. Kirk’s support drew indirect fire from Shapiro’s circle, with Jewish commentators accusing Kirk of enabling antisemitism to appeal to Christian nationalists.
• Zionist donors and pro-Israel groups pressured TPUSA, with X users (e.g., @DanaNawzarAli in September 2025) claiming the “Zionist crowd attacked Charlie Kirk a year ago during the controversy around ‘Christ is King’.” This led to internal conservative rifts, as seen in X posts criticizing Kirk for betraying Jewish allies.
• The ADL and Jewish media (e.g., New York Times op-eds) highlighted the phrase’s use by white nationalists like Nick Fuentes, whom Kirk has platformed, further alienating Zionist networks. Kirk’s evangelical base cheered, but it cost him credibility among Jewish conservatives.
• Impact: The feud amplified divisions on the right, with Kirk caught between Christian supremacists and Zionist allies. It contributed to Owens’ full break from TPUSA circles and ongoing X backlash, including accusations that Kirk is “owned by Jewish donors” yet “angers them” by platforming critics.
4. Platforming Anti-Zionist Figures at TPUSA Events (July 2025)
Kirk’s decision to feature Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith—both critical of Israel—at the TPUSA Student Action Summit sparked immediate backlash from Zionist attendees and donors, marking a recent escalation.
• Key Incident:
• At the July 2025 summit, Carlson stated that U.S. citizens serving in the IDF should have citizenship revoked, drawing cheers from the youth crowd. Smith echoed anti-interventionist views. Kirk, a self-proclaimed Zionist, allowed it despite his pro-Israel stance (e.g., stating in September 2024 that Israel exists as a “Homeland for the Jewish people”).
• Fallout with Associates:
• Zionist influencers and donors flooded X with complaints, calling it a “betrayal” and urging Kirk to “adapt” to anti-Israel youth sentiment or lose relevance (e.g., @propandco post). Jewish pro-Israel accounts accused Kirk of pandering to “groyper” (far-right) elements.
• This built on prior tensions, like kicking out TPUSA ambassador Morgan Ariel in August 2025 for anti-Talmud/Israel posts, but platforming Carlson reversed course, angering allies like Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, who prioritize unconditional Israel support.
• X users like @Groyperer noted Zionists “crying to Kirk,” highlighting the generational divide where Kirk’s events reflect shifting conservative youth views away from Zionism.
• Impact: The event signaled Kirk’s pragmatic shift to retain relevance, but it deepened rifts with establishment Zionists, who saw it as legitimizing anti-Israel rhetoric. Jewish leaders expressed concern over the crowd’s response, fearing it erodes GOP unity on Israel.
Kirk’s decision to feature Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith—both critical of Israel—at the TPUSA Student Action Summit sparked immediate backlash from Zionist attendees and donors, marking a recent escalation.
• Key Incident:
• At the July 2025 summit, Carlson stated that U.S. citizens serving in the IDF should have citizenship revoked, drawing cheers from the youth crowd. Smith echoed anti-interventionist views. Kirk, a self-proclaimed Zionist, allowed it despite his pro-Israel stance (e.g., stating in September 2024 that Israel exists as a “Homeland for the Jewish people”).
• Fallout with Associates:
• Zionist influencers and donors flooded X with complaints, calling it a “betrayal” and urging Kirk to “adapt” to anti-Israel youth sentiment or lose relevance (e.g., @propandco post). Jewish pro-Israel accounts accused Kirk of pandering to “groyper” (far-right) elements.
• This built on prior tensions, like kicking out TPUSA ambassador Morgan Ariel in August 2025 for anti-Talmud/Israel posts, but platforming Carlson reversed course, angering allies like Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, who prioritize unconditional Israel support.
• X users like @Groyperer noted Zionists “crying to Kirk,” highlighting the generational divide where Kirk’s events reflect shifting conservative youth views away from Zionism.
• Impact: The event signaled Kirk’s pragmatic shift to retain relevance, but it deepened rifts with establishment Zionists, who saw it as legitimizing anti-Israel rhetoric. Jewish leaders expressed concern over the crowd’s response, fearing it erodes GOP unity on Israel.
Overall Patterns and Broader Context
• Recurring Themes: Kirk’s fallouts often arise from balancing his evangelical Christian identity (e.g., belief that Jews should convert) with Zionist funding (e.g., from Bernie Marcus). He condemns overt antisemitism but defends phrases/actions that Jewish groups see as coded hostility, leading to accusations of “bipolar” loyalty.
• Key Associates Involved: Ben Shapiro (feud via Owens), ADL (direct condemnations), Elon Musk (endorsed but distanced post), and donors like Marcus (strained funding ties). No single “explosive” personal breakup, but cumulative backlash has isolated Kirk from some Jewish conservative networks.
• Response from Kirk: He has doubled down on pro-Israel advocacy (e.g., campus debates defending Zionism in 2025) while dismissing critics as “woke” or over-sensitive, but the incidents have fueled internal right-wing debates about antisemitism’s rise.
• Recurring Themes: Kirk’s fallouts often arise from balancing his evangelical Christian identity (e.g., belief that Jews should convert) with Zionist funding (e.g., from Bernie Marcus). He condemns overt antisemitism but defends phrases/actions that Jewish groups see as coded hostility, leading to accusations of “bipolar” loyalty.
• Key Associates Involved: Ben Shapiro (feud via Owens), ADL (direct condemnations), Elon Musk (endorsed but distanced post), and donors like Marcus (strained funding ties). No single “explosive” personal breakup, but cumulative backlash has isolated Kirk from some Jewish conservative networks.
• Response from Kirk: He has doubled down on pro-Israel advocacy (e.g., campus debates defending Zionism in 2025) while dismissing critics as “woke” or over-sensitive, but the incidents have fueled internal right-wing debates about antisemitism’s rise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
