a rite of passage for adulthood is to look up for ALL developed nations the history of eugenics/forced sterilization.
i'd always thought eugenics was mostly about encouraging select people to have πΆπ£, but apparently it also included state-sponsored sterilizations.π« π€¦ββοΈso bad.
the creativity recorded in the history of evil is really beyond your wildest imaginations
this rabbit hole was brought to you by googling why people were made about the sydney sweeney jeans ad and then clicking on some links.
i mean, i knew about.. the practice of it in war, and many different imperial experiments on human subjects (pr/na), and as punishment for various crimes, but like.. as a state-sponsored thing after wars ended.. not really. sounds insane.
people are so much scarier than i tend to think π
i think this blind spot for me happened because the things i read over the years focused more on preventing people from rounding people up to murder them or do medical/weapons experiments on them and didn't cover learning about rounding people up to make them unable to reproduce.
all of this is so much more control than anyone should ever want over other people, mostly, with the exception of people who commit violent crimes. if you commit violent crimes against innocent people, i think all bets are off, which should serve as a deterrent to commit more.
i was fed a very strong diet of anti-death penalty materials as a kid, but given what i've learned about the nature of some of these ongoing crimes, i don't think society's advanced enough for that yet. the hope is that it gets there and stays there. but we're not there yet.
some things are important enough to eradicate that dp/cp should remain on the table, which includes male-on-female violence, or adult-on-child violence that is sexual in nature.
if people aren't going stop that, dp/cp needs to return to more places as an enthusiastic practice.
or fatal. i think sexual and/or fatal. that stuff needs to just die out as a thing we do and allow to persist with no consequences or let go with a essentially a tap on the wrist. some things, you just don't do, and that message needs to be clearer.
which is.. i am like a broken record.. why higher baseline criteria for awarding a high school degree is absolutely essential. if you want to TALK or INCENTIVIZE people into better behavior, you have to teach them what words really mean first.
failing that, the most effective solutions are all so much less pleasant than making sure there is a high baseline level of DEFAULT and reliabel civility, or at least LACK of violence against others.
as in, you CANNOT fail education of the masses as a society, bc the repercussions, some violent/fatal, snowball.
You're NOT showing more mercy but cutting people slack AFTER the school system fails them. The school system must be made to do its job and actually educate children.
i'm not saying educated people don't commit violent crimes. that happens too, and often in more systemized ways. i'm just saying like on a basic human level if a person is educated, they are more likely to encounter ideas like.. i have a future. let's not fuck that up with crime.
it's also why i'm so focused on actual transparency in violent crime statistics and security footage.
the rhetoric surrounding this all must asap change to acknowledge that the awful crimes/criminals themselves are inflammatory, not STRAIGHTFORWARD DISCUSSION/DEPICTION of them.
only when there is an functional negative feedback loop about what is unacceptable in civil society will things improve, and only with focused attention on accurate information will we know EXACTLY when things improve enough to warrent lower punishments.
all of our problems with
the current system of what is supposed to be a negative feedback loop for unacceptable actions is completely broken. you can't see clearly who did what to whom where how bad it was bc media censors it, and even when not, the justice system metes out unimaginably light sentences.
you also are not allowed to express rightful anger towards the people who actually hurt you or hold their communities accountable for change. that's a dysfunctional perversion of the very concept of social progress, to re-victimize the victims by blaming them for lack of care
after all that you also can't call out the ppl who generated the nonsense narratives that aren't grounded in history or in statistics, because they ofc have narratives ready to demonize THAT action of holding THEM accountable for willfully misrepresenting the facts of violence.
@threadreaderapp unroll
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Minting a martyr is stupid bc it creates more homework for others in the containment of what ensues.
We need lists introducing differences btwn translations of the bible into english asap. There'll be an influx of the bibliocurious vulnerable to exploitation.
What a huge mess.
If more youth will now explore christianity, we need guidance directing them to the most scholarly modern translations by faculty of top theological seminaries.
You want them on a scholarly path, not falling into the clutches of charismatic pentecostal megachurches, nar, or wcn.
If you thought misinterpretations of bibles were bad back when people read books critically all their lives, now you will see what happens when young people with no reading comprehension skills to speak of wrestle with milllennia-old blueprints translated imperfectly. Good job.
more high schools need western canon reading programs so a) a culture of reading is in place by the time college happens, and b) kids can broaden their horizons to other cultures during college instead of playing catch up encountering full length primary texts for the first time.
variations are possible, but the cultural emphasis must shift from whether schools technically graduate kids who can't read πto whether kids know how to read, write about, and discuss their literal, civilizational, cultural inheritances well enough to enjoy it and continue.
encounter of religious holy texts during k-12 is important not to indoctrinate kids, but to show them a) wth all the western canon is even referring to and 2) what they'll have to navigate the intricacies of during political negotiations over civil and human rights in adulthood.
policies make no sense when exceptionalism drives both fp and domestic but they don't match
you can't be pro life and also pro war. you can't be pro hold japan accountable but NOT korean men for rape/molka/martial law
if after defending it w/ your life, you hurt what you saved,
you've saved nothing. you've groomed it.
if you want to leverage human rights rhetoric to control women domestically, erasing their rights, but give yourself hypocritical leeway internationally, where's the integrity?
the misbehavior of others doesn't justify violent bigotry.
the temptation's strong to fold to stories of what worked, and how much love and friendship existed within chosen structures, but when you steamroll other humans whose lives are crushed by optional logics that leave no room for them to breathe you're no better than the opposition
It need not be connected to a religion at all. In fact, that might help. Either way, it's a powerful, meditative process through which you work through problems, building musculature for introspection.
That musculature is ideology agnostic.
So people who have no daily practice building their muscles for active reflection during which they piece together thoughts, feelings, values, experiences, and observed reality to locate clean throughlines of coherence will always be weaker than those who do work out every day.
Prayer is essentially cross-fit for mental, physical, spiritual, and political integration, God or none.
To look down on it when you've no experience with it is to mark yourself a fool with an arrogant mind closed to potentially beneficial experiences or practices sight unseen.
No one writes the way the New York Times has done for years on end now about violent crime and education unless he 1) assumes everyone is stupider 2) he can manipulate them.
Given even just the bare bones facts of the case, it is not possible to write the lede the way they did.
I didn't bother including the actual first graph because it was pure stalling and filler. Americans deserve much, much higher standards of neutrality and integrity for journalism in this country.
books in new testament: 27
written by men: 27
Paul: 13
John: 4
Peter: 2
Luke: 2
written by anon men: 2 (hebrews might be paul, revelation might be john)
named after men: 11
named after/written by women: 0
so it could be just 8 men who authored nt
super glad i left so early π«
so *any* suggestion that literacy any less than the absolute pinnacle of culture is sufficient for
*any* group or social class (especially ones historically silenced),
and their entry's made to be more "expensive" because they're the "wrong people"
makes me truly apoplectic.
the point of saying some people haven't mastered the basics isn't to make them feel bad, but to let them know they're depriving themselves of the opportunity to best history and become powerful enough to think for themselves, to defend their positions, stories, and sovereignty.