a rite of passage for adulthood is to look up for ALL developed nations the history of eugenics/forced sterilization.
i'd always thought eugenics was mostly about encouraging select people to have 👶🐣, but apparently it also included state-sponsored sterilizations.🫠🤦♀️so bad.
the creativity recorded in the history of evil is really beyond your wildest imaginations
this rabbit hole was brought to you by googling why people were made about the sydney sweeney jeans ad and then clicking on some links.
i mean, i knew about.. the practice of it in war, and many different imperial experiments on human subjects (pr/na), and as punishment for various crimes, but like.. as a state-sponsored thing after wars ended.. not really. sounds insane.
people are so much scarier than i tend to think 😐
i think this blind spot for me happened because the things i read over the years focused more on preventing people from rounding people up to murder them or do medical/weapons experiments on them and didn't cover learning about rounding people up to make them unable to reproduce.
all of this is so much more control than anyone should ever want over other people, mostly, with the exception of people who commit violent crimes. if you commit violent crimes against innocent people, i think all bets are off, which should serve as a deterrent to commit more.
i was fed a very strong diet of anti-death penalty materials as a kid, but given what i've learned about the nature of some of these ongoing crimes, i don't think society's advanced enough for that yet. the hope is that it gets there and stays there. but we're not there yet.
some things are important enough to eradicate that dp/cp should remain on the table, which includes male-on-female violence, or adult-on-child violence that is sexual in nature.
if people aren't going stop that, dp/cp needs to return to more places as an enthusiastic practice.
or fatal. i think sexual and/or fatal. that stuff needs to just die out as a thing we do and allow to persist with no consequences or let go with a essentially a tap on the wrist. some things, you just don't do, and that message needs to be clearer.
which is.. i am like a broken record.. why higher baseline criteria for awarding a high school degree is absolutely essential. if you want to TALK or INCENTIVIZE people into better behavior, you have to teach them what words really mean first.
failing that, the most effective solutions are all so much less pleasant than making sure there is a high baseline level of DEFAULT and reliabel civility, or at least LACK of violence against others.
as in, you CANNOT fail education of the masses as a society, bc the repercussions, some violent/fatal, snowball.
You're NOT showing more mercy but cutting people slack AFTER the school system fails them. The school system must be made to do its job and actually educate children.
i'm not saying educated people don't commit violent crimes. that happens too, and often in more systemized ways. i'm just saying like on a basic human level if a person is educated, they are more likely to encounter ideas like.. i have a future. let's not fuck that up with crime.
it's also why i'm so focused on actual transparency in violent crime statistics and security footage.
the rhetoric surrounding this all must asap change to acknowledge that the awful crimes/criminals themselves are inflammatory, not STRAIGHTFORWARD DISCUSSION/DEPICTION of them.
only when there is an functional negative feedback loop about what is unacceptable in civil society will things improve, and only with focused attention on accurate information will we know EXACTLY when things improve enough to warrent lower punishments.
all of our problems with
the current system of what is supposed to be a negative feedback loop for unacceptable actions is completely broken. you can't see clearly who did what to whom where how bad it was bc media censors it, and even when not, the justice system metes out unimaginably light sentences.
you also are not allowed to express rightful anger towards the people who actually hurt you or hold their communities accountable for change. that's a dysfunctional perversion of the very concept of social progress, to re-victimize the victims by blaming them for lack of care
after all that you also can't call out the ppl who generated the nonsense narratives that aren't grounded in history or in statistics, because they ofc have narratives ready to demonize THAT action of holding THEM accountable for willfully misrepresenting the facts of violence.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No one writes the way the New York Times has done for years on end now about violent crime and education unless he 1) assumes everyone is stupider 2) he can manipulate them.
Given even just the bare bones facts of the case, it is not possible to write the lede the way they did.
I didn't bother including the actual first graph because it was pure stalling and filler. Americans deserve much, much higher standards of neutrality and integrity for journalism in this country.
books in new testament: 27
written by men: 27
Paul: 13
John: 4
Peter: 2
Luke: 2
written by anon men: 2 (hebrews might be paul, revelation might be john)
named after men: 11
named after/written by women: 0
so it could be just 8 men who authored nt
super glad i left so early 🫠
so *any* suggestion that literacy any less than the absolute pinnacle of culture is sufficient for
*any* group or social class (especially ones historically silenced),
and their entry's made to be more "expensive" because they're the "wrong people"
makes me truly apoplectic.
the point of saying some people haven't mastered the basics isn't to make them feel bad, but to let them know they're depriving themselves of the opportunity to best history and become powerful enough to think for themselves, to defend their positions, stories, and sovereignty.
people pretending today to care about a handful of n. korean fishermen + a few hundred korean factory workers in ga are the same ones who character assassinated 10-20 mil u.s. asians for decades and didn't care about favored groups killing american koreans in cold blood at home.
the hypocrisy and lack of integrity in viewing asians of any nationality as only relevant as tools to make the other side look bad is something that is very easy to pick up on after the same folks betrayed american asians on k-12/higher education and violent crime for decades.
also, google maps not working in korea is clearly a security issue, plus corporate evasion of local storage, taxes, and regulations. it's absolutely not a technical barrier. if you don't like that, there are so many other countries to visit. learn korean or complain to google.
"Our own people" is absurd. It was mostly about if colonial holdings were in the contiguous U.S. like for the Louisiana Purchase, Spanish Florida, and Mexican Cessation.
Exceptions: Hawaii, Alaska(complex)
The Philippines was a U.S. colony for 48 years, from 1898 until 1946.
The Insular Cases (1901-1922) created this new era of "unincorporated territories" of "non-citizenship nationals", unlike all previous colonies that were absorbed and incorporated into the union and granted/forced into full citizenship, albeit w huge land loss along ethnic lines.
The Insular Cases reflected a racist, wrong interpretation of the Constitution, granting Congress EXTRAORDINARY overreach to decide who counts as an American citizen or national by based on racist justifications to "legally" objectify overseas colonies as property and not people.
learned last week that the east asian countries have bickered for decades about who has the oldest extant wood block text/scroll print, but the most interesting thing about the fight is that all of the content was buddhist.
made me wonder what the Uṣṇīṣa Vijaya Dhāraṇī says
they weren't in the original sanskrit usually, but translated into hanja, then painstakingly engraved into wood or clay and later, cast into metal
how powerful were the ideas for them to go that crazy over it in 704AD or earlier?
what i've found is that the people who are the most plug and play, copy and paste verbal/argumentation fingerprint spreaders are the least aware that this is how they sound.
they are inceptioned so hard they don't even remember those aren't their words or flow of argumentation.
also if someone tells me one of the playbooks that some famous group used in recent years to sociopathically experiment on innocent people online with, and then you, despite me giving you my trust, take all the same steps, then how am i supposed to make excuses on your behalf?
live in a way such that at least the people who love you can make excuses on your behalf. don't live such that you render all of your plausible deniability null and void, and your behavioral checklist is instantly, universally recognizable as pigheaded, toxic, and avoidant.