Simon Maechling Profile picture
Sep 12 12 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Disinformation isn’t random.
It follows a playbook.

And if you’ve been watching U.S. events lately, you’ve seen it in action. 🧵 1/
Step 1: Bots & Amplifiers
Sleeper accounts suddenly light up.

Fake followers boost the loudest lies.
What looks like “trending” is often manufactured. 2/
Step 2: Deepfakes & Misused Media
Old videos repurposed.

New ones faked.
Images ripped out of context to inflame outrage. 3/
Step 3: Influencer Leverage
Seemingly “independent” voices push narratives.
Sometimes funded, sometimes fooled.

But the message lines up perfectly with foreign agendas. 4/
Step 4: Polarization

Hit the same fractures every time:
👉 Politics
👉 Science
👉 Class

Take what already divides us, then rip it wider. 5/
Step 5: False Flags & Conspiracies
After every tragedy?

Flood the feed with “shadowy plots” and “paid actors.”
The goal: Distrust everyone. 6/
Step 6: Target Swing Audiences
It’s not random.

They know which states, which groups, which fears to hit.
This is precision warfare - just with memes. 7/
Step 7: Emotion Over Facts
Forget policy details.
Frame it as “us vs them.”

Fear. Anger. Moral panic.
That’s what spreads fastest. 8/
Step 8: AI + Algorithms
AI lowers costs, algorithms boost outrage.

Perfect combo for flooding feeds with rage-bait at scale. 9/
🎯 The goals never change:

Kill trust in institutions.
Paralyze action with confusion.
Weaken democracy from within.
Smear opponents, prop up allies. 10/
This isn’t noise.
It’s a playbook.

And unless we learn to spot it, we’ll keep falling for the same script. 11/
The defense starts with awareness.
Disinformation doesn’t win by persuading you. It wins when we fight against each other. 12/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Maechling

Simon Maechling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @simonmaechling

Sep 8
Veritasium's glyphosate video blew up.
Millions watched.

But it left out a lot of science.
And replaced nuance with drama.

Let’s fix that. 🧵👇1/
Main source? Carey Gillam.

She’s not neutral.
She’s spent years working with anti-GMO groups.
That’s like citing an anti-vaxxer to explain mRNA vaccines.

It’s not journalism. It’s advocacy. 2/
The cancer panic?

They quote IARC: “Probably carcinogenic.”

What they don’t tell you:
☕ Coffee is in the same category.
🌙 So is night shift work.
🔥 So are hot drinks.

Hazard ≠ Risk.
That context? Conveniently skipped. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Sep 4
How do you “prove” that vaccines and Tylenol cause autism without real evidence?

There’s a whole playbook for manufacturing scary headlines.

Here’s how it works - and why it falls apart under real science 👇🧵 1/
📈 Step 1: Draw Two Lines.

Plot autism diagnoses over time.
Plot vaccine use and Tylenol sales.

Both go up → “proof.”

Reality: Autism rates rose mainly because of better awareness + broader diagnosis.

Two lines ≠ cause.
Correlation ≠ causation. 2/
📝 Step 2: Ask Parents.

Survey parents of autistic kids:
“Did your child get Tylenol? Vaccines?”

They remember exposures more → fake link.

Reality: When you use pharmacy records instead of memory, the link disappears. 3/
Read 14 tweets
Sep 3
Just so we’re all on the same page…
“Do your own research” doesn’t mean research.
It means:

“Scroll until you find a post that confirms what you already believe.”

Let's talk about it:🧵👇1/
It used to mean:
→ Go to the library.
→ Read peer-reviewed studies.
→ Compare evidence and sources.

Now it means:
→ Watch a 3-hour YouTube video.
→ Follow a meme account.
→ Accuse scientists of lying. 2/
Let’s be clear:

Real research isn’t easy.
It’s slow, painful, and technical.

You don’t stumble into a breakthrough between Reddit threads. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Sep 2
All joking aside…

It's insane how many people trust idiots over scientists.

And I know I’m not the only one who feels this.

Let’s break it down. 🧵👇1/
You study chemistry for 20+ years.
Work in a lab.

Publish peer-reviewed papers.

Then some guy with a ring light and a Rumble channel calls you a fraud - and people believe him. 2/
The new gold standard of “truth” is:

✔ Loud.
✔ Confident.

❌ Qualified.
❌ Cited.

That’s the algorithm’s fault - not science’s. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Sep 2
Have you met Bob?
He’s everywhere.

On TV, in Parliament, in headlines.
Bob is "The Precautionary Guardian".

He sees himself as the last line of defense between ordinary people and dangerous technologies. Pesticides, GMOs, chemicals - in his mind, they are lurking threats.

He has built a career out of warning people about them.

I met Bob one gray morning in London. We drunk coffee, and had a conversation I would never forget 🧵👇1/
Rain streaked down the glass walls of the Bundestag’s café. The place smelled of espresso and wet coats. I was early, nervous but steady.

I knew what Bob represented: a worldview that had shaped European politics for decades.

He arrived right on time. Tall, polite, almost scholarly in his composure. He shook my hand firmly, smiled warmly, and yet his eyes gave away his purpose. He wasn’t here for small talk.

We sat, coffee cups steaming between us. His black, mine with milk.

And then, without hesitation, the debate began. 2/
“Simon,” Bob said, voice calm but sharp,
“glyphosate is dangerous. The WHO itself called it a probable carcinogen. Why should we risk cancer just to save some diesel fuel? Better to plough the fields. Better safe than sorry.”

He said it with such certainty that I could imagine hundreds nodding along.

I leaned in.
“Bob, every regulator in Europe and North America - EFSA, BfR, EPA, Health Canada - looked at the same evidence.

They all concluded the same thing: glyphosate poses no cancer risk at real-world exposure.”

I paused, then shifted the ground.
“But when glyphosate is banned, farmers plough more. That means:
20% more CO₂ from tractors

More soil erosion
Fewer earthworms

So tell me, Bob: is that really precaution?”

He stirred his coffee slowly.
“Cancer is personal, Simon. Soil erosion is abstract. People worry about their health more than worms.”

I smiled.
“Not if you’re a farmer watching your topsoil blow away.” 3/
Read 11 tweets
Sep 1
People who call scientists “shills”… are the same ones who trust random influencers with zero credentials
and a discount code in their bio.

Let me explain. 🧵👇1/
A scientist with 20 years in chemistry?
🧪 “Bought by Big Chemical.”

But a podcast bro selling detox tea?
✨ “Finally, someone brave enough to speak the truth.”

Make. It. Make. Sense. 2/
They say:
“Don’t trust experts - they’re all corrupt.”
Then turn around and blindly trust:

❌ Wellness grifters.
❌ Anonymous Twitter accounts.
❌ Failed actors turned “health coaches” 3/
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(