Okay. I'm going to anger many of you here and many of you are going to choose to "unfollow" me and let me start by saying I truly do not care. Unlike many paid "influencers," I make no money off my social media so there is no financial interest in my keeping you here. This isn't prison. Each and every one of you are under no obligation to be here and you are completely free to go. You will not hurt my feelings in the slightest.
Let me also note that I not only voted for Donald Trump during all three of his presidential runs and worked for his 2016 presidential campaigns, but I knew Charlie Kirk. We were in no way best friends by any means, but I met him several times at various campaign events and considered him a friend. He was a good and decent man.
That said, there have been a lot of theories in regard to what happened to Charlie Kirk since his murder on Wednesday and several people have asked me what my theory is.
I don't have a theory. As a former victims rights advocate and Officer of the Court assigned to hundreds of criminal cases, and being trained to spot inconsistencies in investigations, I was quickly able to put the pieces together based on the official story, which simply made no sense.
One of the most notable aspects relating to Charlie Kirk was his very public praise of Donald Trump. Charlie was a tremendous Trump supporter and was very open and vocal regarding his advocacy of the Trump administration. He was also very pro-Israel. Both are something that stood firm all the way up to the weeks just prior to Charlie's assassination.
In his final weeks, if you go back and watch those final interviews and his final shows, he had begun to openly question Mossad. He also said it may be time to question Mossad's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and its influence on the government.
When that happened, that made him a liability.
I am not saying in any way shape or form that I believe Donald Trump had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.
I AM saying I believe the same people who are controlling Trump and who ordered him to do an about face on the Epstein issue, murdered Charlie Kirk.
Having someone who was such a strong public advocate for the president beginning to openly question Israel's involvement in influencing our government, at that point, made him a liability. Charlie had a tremendous reach and an enormous platform with Turning Point. When he began to question who was actually running our government, he stopped being an asset and became a liability.
I believe Trump came into this with, and retained all the way up to his second election in November, the best of intentions and a true desire to save America from the Deep State. But I believe the powers that be pulled him aside after Butler and told him that if they had wanted to kill him that day, they would have, that he should consider that a warning shot and that if he refuses to play the game going forward that they will by no means miss next time. I also believe they have compromising information on him that they are threatening to make public, whether that be about him or one of his children, I do not know, but I believe the combination of the information they have on him and their threats to kill him or harm his family is why he pulled back on the Epstein issue.
Charlie had begun to make the connection.
It is clear to me based on all the information I've reviewed and all thats occurred in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday that Charlie Kirk was murdered by members of the US Government in connection with and at the direct orders of Mossad.
It was done publicly in order to send a very clear and direct message to anyone else with a platform who may dare to publicly question the system.
Let me also note that I not only voted for Donald Trump during all three of his presidential runs and worked for his 2016 presidential campaigns, but I knew Charlie Kirk. We were in no way best friends by any means, but I met him several times at various campaign events and considered him a friend. He was a good and decent man.
That said, there have been a lot of theories in regard to what happened to Charlie Kirk since his murder on Wednesday and several people have asked me what my theory is.
I don't have a theory. As a former victims rights advocate and Officer of the Court assigned to hundreds of criminal cases, and being trained to spot inconsistencies in investigations, I was quickly able to put the pieces together based on the official story, which simply made no sense.
One of the most notable aspects relating to Charlie Kirk was his very public praise of Donald Trump. Charlie was a tremendous Trump supporter and was very open and vocal regarding his advocacy of the Trump administration. He was also very pro-Israel. Both are something that stood firm all the way up to the weeks just prior to Charlie's assassination.
In his final weeks, if you go back and watch those final interviews and his final shows, he had begun to openly question Mossad. He also said it may be time to question Mossad's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and its influence on the government.
When that happened, that made him a liability.
I am not saying in any way shape or form that I believe Donald Trump had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.
I AM saying I believe the same people who are controlling Trump and who ordered him to do an about face on the Epstein issue, murdered Charlie Kirk.
Having someone who was such a strong public advocate for the president beginning to openly question Israel's involvement in influencing our government, at that point, made him a liability. Charlie had a tremendous reach and an enormous platform with Turning Point. When he began to question who was actually running our government, he stopped being an asset and became a liability.
I believe Trump came into this with, and retained all the way up to his second election in November, the best of intentions and a true desire to save America from the Deep State. But I believe the powers that be pulled him aside after Butler and told him that if they had wanted to kill him that day, they would have, that he should consider that a warning shot and that if he refuses to play the game going forward that they will by no means miss next time. I also believe they have compromising information on him that they are threatening to make public, whether that be about him or one of his children, I do not know, but I believe the combination of the information they have on him and their threats to kill him or harm his family is why he pulled back on the Epstein issue.
Charlie had begun to make the connection.
It is clear to me based on all the information I've reviewed and all thats occurred in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday that Charlie Kirk was murdered by members of the US Government in connection with and at the direct orders of Mossad.
It was done publicly in order to send a very clear and direct message to anyone else with a platform who may dare to publicly question the system.
The radical left messaging scribbled on the bullets was done to create infighting between left vs right and deflect from government involvement.
You have to ask questions. As a woman who owns nearly every gun known to man and who's trained in forensic analysis, personal knowledge dictates a shot with a high powered rifle, as the FBI claims occurred, would have left a much larger wound to the throat. His throat would have essentially exploded. Further, the FBI claims the shot was fired with a Mauser 98 with a 30-06 round. However, the gun they've shown as evidence, which they claim to have found in the woods, appears to be a Remington 700 short action rifle, which will not hold a 30-06 round. That was indication number one that the entire official story was a complete fabrication.
And let me clarify that I obviously have not examined the weapon they claim to have recovered. I'm saying the photo they released appears to be a Remington 700 Short based only on personal experience with such firearms and based on the government's claim that it was a Mauser with a 30-06 round that was used to kill him.
Interesting responses. My question? Which photo that's been released by the FBI are you basing your arguments that it was, indeed, a Mauser?
Because according to my count, they've released three different photos of what they claim to be the weapon used, each representing three entirely different guns.
Because according to my count, they've released three different photos of what they claim to be the weapon used, each representing three entirely different guns.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
