🧵 There’s a lot of talk about Armed Queers SLC after Charlie Kirk’s assassination—especially since they suddenly deleted their Instagram account.
This thread explains who they are and what they stand for. 👇
1️⃣ Origins and Purpose
Armed Queers Salt Lake City (AQSLC) is a socialist LGBTQ+ collective founded in summer 2020 during the nationwide George Floyd protest wave.
📍 Based in Salt Lake City, it grew out of local Black Lives Matter marches and queer mutual-aid networks.
Organizers say they created the group to protect queer and trans people—especially Black and brown trans women—from harassment and violence, citing rising hate crimes and what they call “state and right-wing attacks” on LGBTQ+ communities.
2️⃣ Ideology
AQSLC describes itself as revolutionary, anti-capitalist, and anti-fascist.
They call for queer self-determination, the abolition of police and prisons, and dismantling of colonial and capitalist power structures.
They emphasize mutual aid networks and direct action, drawing on radical queer history, anti-imperialism, and socialist theory (including Paulo Freire).
3️⃣ Guns as Core Strategy
Unlike most LGBTQ+ groups, AQSLC openly embraces gun ownership.
They argue that gun-control laws often disarm working-class and marginalized people while far-right extremists stay armed.
Members say carrying firearms provides a visible deterrent against hate-motivated attacks.
4️⃣ Founders & Instagram Deletion
The group was co-founded in mid-2020 by Ermiya Fanaeian and fellow queer activists from Utah’s protest scene.
Fanaeian—known for March for Our Lives work—helped launch AQSLC to defend LGBTQ+ communities and promote socialist, anti-police ideals.
Other early organizers remain largely anonymous, consistent with the group’s collective identity and security concerns.
Ermiya Fanaeian also started the Pink Pistols chapter in Salt Lake City before starting Queers SLC
"My name is Ermiya Fanaeian, and I am a student at Salt Lake School for The Performing Arts. For the last three years I have worked as a sociopolitical organizer for the Utah Pride Center, and The ACLU of Utah.
“My activism work as revolved around a multiplicity of political issues but I have focused primarily on Trans rights." My activism work has revolved around a multiplicity of political issues but I have focused primarily on Trans rights. I plan on studying Law and one day running for state legislature. Tackling the issue of gun control is important to me because I am done with the senseless violence that is affecting our education.”
Ermiya confounded the Utah chapter of March for Our Live in March 2018 which was a youth led gun violence prevention movement.
His stance pivoted around mid 2020 when he found the Pink Pistols SLC
“Pulse, for me, was a huge pivot point, wanting to shift my understanding of what guns can do for us, as well as my time spent in the gun violence prevention movement. I was actually a gun-control activist for years and years.”
Their focus was arming young people in their 20’s.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 A Minnesota political donor pipeline intersects with a Maine nonprofit under a MaineCare fraud probe, embedded in the state’s official “New Americans” infrastructure linked to Governor Janet Mills.
This isn’t a conspiracy. It’s all public record.
Thread 🧵👇
It starts with Maine Gov. Janet Mills.
Mills launched the Office of New Americans alongside lawmakers, including Rep. Deqa Dhalac.
Rep. Deqa Dhalac worked with Gov. Janet Mills on legislation creating Maine’s Office of New Americans.
After that framework was established, Gateway Community Services Maine, listed by the state as part of that ecosystem, was awarded $500,000 in public funding through Maine CDC / DHHS programs.
Then, in December 2025, Maine DHHS suspended MaineCare payments to Gateway over suspected fraud.
‼️ Why would a Minnesota state House candidate be financially connected to a Maine nonprofit now facing a $1 million MaineCare fraud investigation and named in a congressional request for Treasury Suspicious Activity Reports?
That question now surrounds Abdi Daisane, the owner of Blooming Kids Child Care Center, whose business has recently been cited for more than 80 licensing violations. At the same time, his campaign finance filings reveal donor ties that reach far beyond Minnesota.
That alone raises concerns. But this isn’t just a story about local compliance failures or routine campaign fundraising.
When you follow the donor network, the picture stops looking local and starts pointing toward something much larger, more coordinated, and worth serious scrutiny.
I pulled Daisane’s donor list and I found a cluster that doesn’t make sense unless there’s coordination.
A group of Maine donors show up in his Minnesota filings, several at or near the max.
And the employer line is the tell: Gateway Community Services (Portland, Maine).
Straight from the report: multiple Portland-area donors list Gateway (or adjacent language access work) and hit the $1,000 level. That is not “random support.” That is a pipeline.
Now here’s why Gateway is not just “some nonprofit.”
On Dec. 23, 2025, Bangor Daily News reported Maine DHHS halted MaineCare payments to Gateway while investigating “credible allegations of fraud,” after reviewing claims and seeking to recoup nearly
$1 million.
Maine Public reported the same escalation and described a DHHS audit finding overbilling exceeding $1 million.
And yes, federal eyes are on the orbit. Bangor Daily News reported Homeland Security Investigations agents visited sites in Lewiston, including Gateway’s office, as part of what HSI described as business audits.
So read that again: a Minnesota candidate’s donor cluster runs into a Maine entity under a fraud probe and federal auditing pressure.
🧵 The Seditious Six and the Color Revolution Playbook
The Seditious Six video is not random. Six Democrat lawmakers with military and intel backgrounds aimed a message straight at U.S. troops and the intel community, telling them to refuse “illegal orders” from a future Trump administration.
The language they use lines up with Brookings’ Democracy Playbook 2025, written and pushed by Norm Eisen and others, which explains how to “assist civil resistance” and pressure “opponents” abroad.
It is the same style of language Western networks have used around color revolutions and regime change overseas. Now that playbook is being applied at home.
The 2025 Playbook opens with an essay called “Seven Pillars to Defend Democracy. The Case of the United States.”
Brookings sells it as a guide to protect American democracy in a “challenging” 2025.
In plain language, it reads like a manual to protect their institutions and their network from another Trump administration.
Note: When they say “defend democracy” in this context, what they really mean is “protect our control from Trump.”
And when the Playbook labels a government the “opponent,” the unspoken substitution is “a Trump administration.”
Once you make that translation, the entire document snaps into focus.
The section, “Assisting Civil Resistance and Nonviolent Movements,” the authors describe nonviolent struggle as a way to “control, combat, and even destroy the opponents power” without using force.
They also say these movements tend to rise when people believe elections and legal channels have “failed to produce results.”
In plain terms, the Playbook is a manual for using organized refusal and pressure campaigns to strip an opponent government of real power without firing a shot.
More than six million people are now enrolled in Obamacare who do not actually qualify for the program.
That number is up twenty-eight percent from last year.
Over half of those claiming to be low-income are ineligible, costing taxpayers more than twenty-seven billion dollars in a single year.
Democrats still call it a success and refuse to address the widespread abuse.
Massive Fraud has spread across 29 states
This problem is happening across the entire country.
Florida has nearly five times more Obamacare sign-ups than real eligible residents.
Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Michigan, and several others have enrollment numbers that are more than double what they should be.
Even states that expanded Medicaid are seeing millions of improper enrollments.
💰 The Money Trail
Big insurance companies collect billions in federal subsidies through Obamacare plans, while brokers earn large commissions for every enrollment they submit, even when applications turn out to be false or inflated.
Some enrollees underreport their income to qualify for bigger government payments, and federal oversight has struggled to keep up with the scale of the problem.
Although there have been criminal cases and penalties, enforcement remains limited compared to the amount of money at stake.
The result is a system where taxpayer dollars flow to INSURANCE COMPANIES and BROKERS, often with little accountability to the working Americans footing the bill. 🏦
🧵 How George Soros bankrolls the “No Kings” protest network
1️⃣ The Setup
What looks like a spontaneous protest is anything but.
The “No Kings” partners trace back to George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and its proxy groups like Tides Foundation.
The same handful of intermediaries push millions through nonprofits that share staff, goals, and donors, all marching under the same “grassroots” banner.
2️⃣ Legal & Advocacy Front
The ACLU Foundation alone got $16.7 million from OSF, plus nearly another million through Tides.
Add in groups like the Feminist Majority Foundation and the Arab American Institute, and you’ve got Soros’s fingerprints on nearly every “civil liberties” cause that later shows up at protests.
It’s not grassroots when one billionaire oligarch bankrolls the lawyers and the lawsuits.
3️⃣The Climate Coalition
The “environmental” wing is heavily funded too:
• League of Conservation Voters – $13 M
• Friends of the Earth – $1.4 M
• Center for Biological Diversity – $1 M
• Oil Change International – $6.8 M
These same groups lobby in DC and run the street rallies. Soros funds both the messaging and the movement.
🧵The Alliance for Global Justice (AFGJ) is under fire after being linked to funding Antifa-aligned groups.
AFGJ hit back, insisting they don’t fund other organizations and claim they were “deplatformed” after payment processors, pressured by right-wing activists, blocked their ability to receive online donations, which they call their lifeline for fundraising.
But here’s what AFGJ isn’t telling you…
@DataRepublican
AFGJ says it “does not fund any organization other than our own.”
Yet its two most recent Form-990s show grants/assistance paid to others:
- $565,232 (FY ending 3/31/2023)
-$442,187 (FY ending 3/31/2024).
Schedule details for FY2024 name outside recipients, for example:
🔹 East Bay Sanctuary Covenant: $53,558
🔹 Community Initiatives: $30,000
🔹 The People’s Forum: $26,894 (Neville Singham’s organization)
Bottom line: by its own filings, money flows beyond “our own.”
AFGJ’s fiscal-sponsorship (FSP) model provides the infrastructure that lets aligned projects raise and move money:
🔹 Hosted donation pages and back-office processing
🔹 Ability to receive foundation grants through AFGJ
🔹 Payroll and benefits for project staff
🔹 An admin fee of ~8% on donations
Even if you don’t call it “grant-making,” this setup routes funds through AFGJ to third parties—functionally, that’s funding.