Should pastors have mentioned Charlie Kirk's assassination yesterday?đź§µ
Every pastor is responsible to shepherd the flock in which the Lord has placed him. For that reason I wouldn't presume to dictate to any pastor on this situation. But I did mention him.
Here's why. 1/
Q. 159 in the LC says pastors should preach the Word of God should be preached "wisely, applying themselves to the necessities and capacities of the hearers."
This wisdom has served me well in my ministry. "What do they need & what can they handle?" Those questions guide me. 2/
In one sense we always need more than we can handle—John 16:12 & Hebrews 5:11-12. So, every wise pastor will at times leave some needful things unsaid until a more propitious time. But we should always be thinking in these 2 categories: necessity & capacity. 3/
As our pastors evaluated our church we knew we would have been derelict of our duty to say nothing about Charlie. Our people have been taught to see the world in light of God's law & gospel. The majority recognized his murder as a violation of the law because of the gospel. 4/
Charlie was murdered because he was a Christian fulfilling his calling as a Christian in one of the most hostile, anti-God environments in the western world—university campuses. He is a Christian martyr, just as Stephen (Acts 7) & Jim Elliot are. 5/
All Christians who have been put to death for their faith are martyrs. It seemed unthinkable for our elders, therefore, not to address Charlie's murder. We did in our welcome, prayer of confession, pastoral prayer, & morning & evening sermons. 6/
Neither sermon deviated from the consecutive, expository plan. For me, that was not difficult since Genesis 7 was my text. @GundenGraham had to work a little harder in Matt 5:27-30, but did so faithfully. Our people were comforted by the Word applied in this way. 7/
That is to say, they needed it. And they handled it quite well.
Charlie Kirk's murder is not the only martyrdom the church has witnessed in our generation. But it is the most dramatic &, I believe, will prove to be the most pivotal. It has awakened something long dormant. 8/
Countless testimonies demonstrate the divide which afflicts our nation—a divide between good & evil, righteousness & sin. We do not all see this divide the same way, but no one can deny its reality. Some—many, I pray—see it & are seeking answers from Scripture & church. 9/
Others see it as merely political & think Christians like me have sold our souls to a political party. It is the former than I am most concerned with. I want to reach them & teach them the gospel of Jesus Christ—the very gospel for which Charlie was murdered. 10/
So, yes, I mentioned his death & legacy. I did so because he was martyred for the very cause of God & truth that animates my own life. I prayed publicly for God to raise thousands who will follow him as he followed Christ. I will continue to do so. 11/
I particularly will continue to challenge men to repent of cowardice & stand up to be counted for the lordship of Jesus Christ in every area of life. I praise God that the men in my church demand that I do so & would rightly fire me if I did not. The battle is not over. 12/
We have not yet seen the last martyr (Rev 6:9-11). Demons do not go quietly into the night. God's people must be equipped to stand firm. They need such equipping. An increasing number can handle such equipping. Those who are not yet able, need their capacities increased. 13/
Pastors have been given this responsibility. May the Lord help us to own the stewardship that He has given us. And may God send His Spirit with power as godly men wield His Sword in His world, regardless of cost or consequence. 14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A PSA đź§µto every @SBCExecComm related entity. It is time for transparency. Many have called for it for years & an increasing number of SBC pastors & church members are joining the chorus. The old ways of operating are over. The 11th Commandment has become a tool for coverup. 1/9
The painful (& shameful) revelations that are coming to light are an example of what the SBC will experience if transparency must be forced by the churches rather than offered by the entities accountable to them. A day of reckoning is coming. It cannot be stopped. 2/9
Countless churches have left the SBC in the face of obfuscation, duplicity, failed leadership, & refusals to be held accountable that have come from SBC agencies & institutions. But many who remain will no longer settle for condescending dismissals of legitimate concerns 3/9
đź§µ Every SBCer needs to listen to @pj_robertson, chairman of @SBCExecComm1 describe spending $14 million given through the CP to discover that NO sex abuse coverup has existed in the EC. If you only have 11 minutes, start at 14:00. 1/4 #SBC24
The SBC has been listening to & following the wrong people. Many of those leading us have failed to serve us properly. It is time for new leadership. Get to Indy next month, vote for the @sbcamendment & a courageous, new president. 2/4
This interview is encouraging because it shows the competent, humble, strong leadership of the EC by @pj_robertson. It vindicates concerns that many have voiced for years & shows the need to apologize to former leaders who were sinfully castigated for not caving in to those 3/4
A🧵—I am grateful for this clarification—really a repudiation—of the statement originally reported that @jbwester, @bartbarber, & @keahbone et al claimed that the new, independent organization would be funded by SendRelief.
Why was it originally reported that "Send Relief officials agreed February 19 to release funds to help launch ARC" when Send Relief officials say no such agreement was ever made?
I don't know the answer to those questions, but someone does. Actually several people do.
The SBC has been languishing in a sea of obfuscation, cover-up, & disregard for churches for years. It is time for our leaders to step up & tell "headquarters" what is going on. 3/6
Bart confuses categories in this thread & the result can cause misunderstanding of what it means for a Baptist church to be in "friendly cooperation" with other Baptist churches in a convention. While it is true that no entity or organization has 1/
authority to rule over any church—since all churches are autonomous—that does not mean that an autonomous church is free to associate with whatever entity or convention it desires. Just as churches are autonomous, so are associations & conventions of churches. That is, 2/
just as an association or convention of churches (like the SBC) cannot dictate what a local church believes or practices, neither can a local church require an association or convention to provide membership to their congregation. It is this precise point that is in dispute 3/
My kerfuffle with my friend, @GMRench đź§µ
My concern is not about whether wine or grape juice should be used in the Lord's Supper. It's about his insistence that one disobeys "God's clear command" if he doesn't use wine and that “'masculine' (emphasize scare quotes) [men who] 1/
sit under pastors who serve them grape juice for communion" are unmanly. Such pastors, he says, "Might as well serve them a baby bottle with a nipple & milk in it."
While he provides a target rich environment for hunters of foolishness & fallacies, I objected to only 1 point. 2/
I asked him for the source of that "clear command." He replied with Mt 26:27 & 1 Cor. 11: 23-26, calling attention to "the imperatives." His reasoning: since wine was in the cup, when Jesus says, "Do this," that constitutes "God's clear command" that only wine may be served. 3/
"Churches faced a difficult decision about whether & how long to remain closed. Should they obey the government, or insist on their right to stay open?...Obey Romans 13, or Hebrews 10?"
Miller pits Scripture against Scripture & suggests that the dilemma Christians face is which one to obey. He tries to show the decision to shut down churches on order of the magistrate is morally equivalent to the decision to continue meeting. Just choose which verses to obey 2/
This methodology reinforces the spiritually disastrous notion that we can take a cafeteria-style approach to Scripture.
"Oh, you are having Hebrews 10? I think I will go with Romans 13 today. I might try Hebrews 10 in a few months."