The reason your new year resolutions fail is because you tie them to time not events/actions.
Between now and 31st December, you’ll create a list of things you will not achieve by 31st December 2026 and convince yourself that you will achieve them.
I’ll tell you why.
When you say you want to achieve XYZ by March 2026, what exactly do you mean?
I’m sorry, but it means nothing.
The only way you can measure it is to wait till March 2026.
You’ve created a binary situation in which you either succeed or fail AND one that can only be determined by the end of March 2026.
This creates two problems: on one hand, your definition of success is achieving your unrealistic goal and this explains why you feel defeated. In the real world, success is a spectrum not a binary choice.
Because of how you’ve defined success, achieving 75% of your unrealistic goals is unacceptable. And it gets more complicated when you’re actively comparing yourself to others.
But this is a different conversation.
On the other hand, there’s no way to measure how far away you are from your goals until we get to the end of March 2026.
And without this feedback on whether or not you’re making progress, it’s easy to lose focus and completely abandon the goal before the end of February.
It is not possible to think long term if you can’t think short term.
What you consider strategic planning is actually postponing the day you’ll feel bad about yourself.
I’ve found that saying you want to be XYZ is better than saying you want to be XYZ by March 2026.
At first, you’ll think there is no deadline, but in reality the deadline is everyday. Not a random day in 2026; a date that is not even a product of clear thought or based on data. It’s just wishful thinking.
If the deadline is everyday, it means you’ll need to DO something everyday that will make you become XYZ.
It may not sound intuitive at first, but the list of things you’ll DO everyday should be your new year resolution, not the outcome.
If you understand what I mean, you’ll also realise that you don’t have to wait until the new year to start doing those things you’ve identified. You can start doing them now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I found a 'hack', but it takes a lot of hard work!
I’ve never been on the job market for more than 3 months.
Besides the fact that there is a hiring cycle, strategic planning and alignment combined with extraordinary hard work work will ALWAYS yield extraordinary results.
You’re more likely to get a job in the first half of the year. This is is because it is around this time that hiring budgets are decided and roles commissioned.
A company in the middle of funding round is more likely to hire soon, so leveraging LinkedIn to connect wit people there is a smart move.
Identify people who already have the roles you want, align your profile and skills, fill the gaps. This takes time and hard work.
I know it’s not what you expect to hear, but stay with me:
Play the long game!
I know it’s 'tech‘ but you can either choose to build a career or focus on small gigs here and there and end up like a construction site worker: no project, no income.
You need to be in employment even if it is an unpaid role.
So while you’re doing your freelancing, you should Java a job in a company that can vouch for your work experience.
The salary should not matter when you’re in this building phase.
You just need something on your CV.
It’s hard evaluating your freelancing skills experience. In most cases, if all you’ve been doing is freelancing, it’s almost as good as no experience at all.
You'll have a hard time getting a visa if you by chance manage to go through the initial filter for a relocation job.
Maybe I’ll continue with my controversial takes today.
Adding "Open to work" on your LinkedIn profile will do the opposite of what you expect.
Recruiters will rather reach out to people who already have a job and actually prefer poaching people who don’t look desperate.
I’ve been building a tool to help job seekers get more interviews and I’ve done extensive research on this topic.
Everybody knows when you’re trying to get a new job. All of a sudden you become very active on LinkedIn and post a lot of your work that should be in a portfolio site (depending on your seniority level) or covered in technical articles.
I get a lot of questions on how to stand out while job hunting.
I think we focus too much on outcomes.
This may not work for you, but it worked for me and the people who listened to me.
Outcomes are a consequence of a process.
There's nothing you experience today that is new.
This means a lot of people walked the very path you're on right now.
So, maybe, just maybe if you do what they did, you will get similar results.
There's nothing novel about trying to get a job. You don't have to reinvent the wheel.
My approach is to ignore outcomes.
If X + Y is Z, this means that there is a path to Z i.e. the combination of X and Z in any order. Sometimes the order does matter, but let's assume it's irrelevant.
What can we deduce from this?
To get a job, you need to convince recruiters and prospective employers.
If you’re a software engineer, this weekend re-write your CV and polish it like you’re applying to Google, then go to GitHub and pick two of your best projects and zip them.
Add some context like your background and how you got into tech.
Then attach your CV and the 2 zipped files.
Prompt the model to review your background, experience and technical ability demonstrated in your projects and predict fields where it will take the most minimal effort to have a successful career.
You’re looking for low effort but high value specialisations.
I am a realist.
If you want someone who will tweet fiction, then you can follow someone else.
Over here, I talk about real life experiences.
You don't need money to get a 'baddie'.
The man down the street has 3 wives. If his wives apply makeup too, they'll qualify as baddies 😂
Like @PenTitan said, baddie is a social construct.
If your pool is mainly jobless babes with big nyash and boobs, then you will need a lot of money to woo and even keep them.
As a retired womaniser and practicing polygamist, I can tell you for free the more money you have, the less money you need to get a responsible and decent woman with 'baddie' features.