Thread by @2Smartski

Acoustic analysis confirms shooter was near ground-level, ~70-90ft away — not a rooftop.
Crack–bang intervals across all recordings: 0.08–0.14s = 70–90 ft distance
(speed of sound @ 82°F = 1141 ft/s)
Closest audio clip shows total crack/bang overlap, impact clear = <100 ft

With each clip, all of them reflect a crack/bang that aligns with that 70-90ft distance band.
Some examples
The one showcasing two waveforms is especially telling, as both of these clips not only were the most defined, but they also happened to both be recorded on balcony level.

Observations:
Clearest separation compared to other angles
Bang is CLEARLY visible as a distinct event around 0.21-0.22
Complex echo pattern starting at .35, consistent with courtyard acoustics
Being above shot origin in both cases means more direct audio path, less obstruction

This distant balcony recording is golden because:
Far enough for clear separation
Close enough for strong signal
Different angle provides triangulation
Despite the further distance, timing still PERFECTLY aligns with 70-90ft (shooter->Charlie)

So with this :
70-90ft confirmed
Flash captured near ground level matches timing
Wound trajectory (rear-right → front-left) fits origin within this band provided by these results

AND:

Rooftop theory fails: would require 0.37s delay @ 130 m (426 ft) + MUCH louder report

I try to avoid speculating on much other than what can be proven, but given the audio overall I'd be confident in assuming:
Suppressed intermediate cartridge (.300 Blackout)
Supersonic crack + reduced muzzle blast
SIG MCX/Q Honey Badger fit profile (compact, accurate @ 70-90ft

Math + physics don’t lie:
Real numbers (crack–bang, sound speed, distance)

Cross-checks against MULTIPLE independent recordings to account for echo/reflections

Matches visual evidence ("flash", wound trajectory).

@tjphager @Proselytizer18 @I_Am_JohnCullen Looks like you gotta message me first though, and I’m logging off for tonight.

Tomorrow let’s talk though because I definitely am all ears on this entire thing

I didn’t pick an assumed location, caliber or a rifle, and work backwards. I used the method with the fewest assumptions: measure the crack/bang delay in every clip, convert Δt to distance using the speed of sound, and plot circles. Where they overlap is the only location consistent with all recordings.

The rooftop (~426 ft) would need ~0.37s crack/bang. None of the clips show anything close.

Different equations exist, but I chose the one that doesn’t require guessing bullet type/velocity. I also cross-checked every available source to rule out outliers/echos etc…

Like unless I’m wrong, if the rooftop theory is correct the cameras closest to Charlie should reflect that distance properly.

Though they show almost complete crack/bang overlap…

So as we’ve been trying to showcase: recordings nearest to Charlie ➡️ almost no measurable separation.

The only ~0.2s “bangs” shows up as a secondary artifacts, not the primary report.

@PennyCrayon5 @i11umin8ed @Proselytizer18 @I_Am_JohnCullen Paired with the fact that I don’t trust the official narrative or the government for that matter, so that’s a small driving force behind my work

@PennyCrayon5 @i11umin8ed @Proselytizer18 @I_Am_JohnCullen The official narrative makes no sense whatsoever, too many holes

I recognized that and just went to work🤷🏼‍♂️