Another low moment in yesterday’s hearing was Patel saying he and MAGA Bondi tried to get Epstein files out but judges wouldn’t let them.
Here’s what really happened:
🧵
Federal judges (who are not idiots) know that ONLY grand jury documents are protected by secrecy rule.
So why, two separate judges wondered, would FBI/DOJ release nothing FBI/DOJ had, and only try to release protected documents? Weird, huh?
Then the judges looked at the grand jury documents and noticed how few they were (a “snippet”) and how it was most ALREADY public. Oops.
Quote: “unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence”; any knowledgeable person would “learn next to nothing new.”
Both judges said (a) no public interest in releasing because no there there, and (b) obviously not pursuit of transparency but the opposite.
One even said the best reason to release would be to show the public what a fake effort at transparency Patel/Bondi engaged in.
Quote: unsealing would “expose as disingenuous the Government’s public explanations for moving to unseal,” that the stunt “was aimed not at ‘transparency’ but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.” Ouch.
(BTW a federal judge calling an argument from the highest levels of DOJ “disingenuous” would set off alarms in any non-MAGA DOJ. But Audience Of One.)
So now the poor fool uses that blown cover at hearing, as if those judges hadn’t exposed the FBI/DOJ scam. Oy.
What happens next time the FBI or DOJ go before either judge, and the judges remember this dumb and dishonest FBI conduct?
Credibility matters in law enforcement, and credibility with judges matters a LOT. This is amateur hour self-injurious foolishness.
All done while sitting on tens of thousands of pages of their own files, and not investigating tens of millions in Epstein “suspicious activity reports.”
(Clue to Patel/Bondi: if you’re actually looking for Epstein suspicious activity, maybe look at Epstein “suspicious activity reports.”)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Republicans still grouse about Harry Reid “going nuclear” ONCE, way back in 2013, to undo their blockade of D.C. Circuit judicial nominees. Supreme Court nominees were negotiated out of that.
🧵
Then, when Republicans had the majority and wanted to jam partisan justices onto the Supreme Court, they went nuclear. Happily. So much for their complaining; so much for the deal exempting the Supreme Court.
Senate Republicans have now gone nuclear THREE TIMES in the last few months (four, technically, if you count going nuclear twice in this episode). All the big talk while we were in the majority, all the early assurances — POOF! Pure fakery.
After Trump’s fossil-fuel goons shut down Revolution Wind, I’ve been waiting for the phone to ring with the ransom demand.
But maybe this is attempted murder, not extortion, and there will be no demand.
🧵
That moves us to litigation, where my experience tells me the discovery phase will be fascinating as the lawyers dig into the true motivations and scheming behind this ugly fossil-fuel thuggery.
In the meantime, it’s worth spotlighting the corruption. This is a switcheroo to replace the clean energy electrons from Revolution with polluting fossil-fuel-generated electrons, adding revenues to Trump’s political patrons and string-pullers.
Team Trump is purposefully raising your electricity prices, hoping you’ll be mad at your electric utility and not blame them. The benefit to them is extra dollars for their greedy fossil fuel donors.
Here’s how it works. 🧵
1. The Trumpsters make good on their crooked deal with fossil fuel donors to harass and harm fossil fuel’s clean energy competitors, competitors who actually made up 95% of all new power added to the grid last year.
2. Delaying that clean energy coming on line puts more dependence on polluting fossil fuel, so more pollution (they don’t care, they get to pollute for free) but also more consumption, meaning more revenue (bingo!) to fossil fuel.
With Emil Bove safely through his sham Senate confirmation proceedings, the two Trump judges just lifted the three-months-long administrative stay that had kept any evidence of Bove’s contempt of court bottled up.
It gets worse: the two Trump judges then used “mandamus” to undo the district court’s unappealable order and halt the contempt proceedings entirely. First, abuse of administrative stay, then abuse of mandamus, to shield Trump mischief from review.
At all costs, judicial inquiry into Trump Department of Justice contempt had to be stopped, even the MAGA AG trying to “create a conflict” with a bizarre ethics complaint against the United States district judge. Two Trump judges did the deed.
So he’d understand the full scenario that just touched the Judicial Conference (the administrative body of judges that oversees the operations of the Judicial Branch), which he convenes and chairs.
🧵
The saga begins with the much-reported battle over illegal deportations that played out in federal court, in the courtroom of Chief Judge Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, a respected veteran of decades on the bench.
Federal judges, particularly senior and respected ones, aren’t used to being conned, tricked or lied to, particularly not by the government. DOJ’s conduct in the deportation proceedings caused Boasberg to find probable cause of criminal contempt.
Republicans are saying that our opposition to Trump nominees is “unprecedented.” Seriously? Let’s take a look at some of the stuff that is really “unprecedented”:
A partisan rescissions bill pulling back funding that was agreed to by both sides in bipartisan appropriations agreements.
Over-ruling the Parliamentarian to destroy emissions standards to let their Big Oil donors sell more gasoline.
Appointing to a United States Court of Appeals a character involved in three prosecutorial misconduct episodes in six months, and a subject of pending contempt of court proceedings.