Last week, a drunk or drugged guy was raving outside my house at 3 in the morning for over an hour. He trespassed and damaged my property.
I called the police. They drove past the scene, saw the guy and didn't bother stopping because *they* thought he was no threat. Within seconds of them passing he was back at it.
I have all this on camera.
And yet the police have time to pull shit like this.
We called the police a second time that night and they never even bothered to show.
My wife called the police again later that day to complain about the failure of the police to act and *eventually* a couple of police showed up 4 days later. They were apologetic and helpful.
The thing is that the guy has already committed a crime, and I had evidence. I probably wouldn't have pressed charges but AT A MINIMUM the police should have picked up and had him sleep off whatever he was on in a cell overnight. It keeps us safer and is probably better for him as well.
The point is that the primary function of the police isn't "community relations" during business hours (which too frequently means harassing people for free speech), it's responding to crimes or being seen on the beat to prevent them in the first place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This chart might look like a chart of CO2 emissions but it's not. It's a Rorschach Test.
For some reason, otherwise intelligent Brits will look at it and conclude that:
- China is doing an amazing job building renewables
- the UK is a unique villain because of "historic emissions"
- China's emissions are set to decline... next year
The reactions are utterly bizarre, it's a cult.
Let's look at the farcical "historical emissions" claim.
Another way of saying "historical" is "cumulative". China's cumulative emissions overtook the UK nearly 30 years ago. And then look what happened?
Activists use the term "historical" rather than cumulative because they want to imply that the UK is somehow uniquely culpable. By doing this they're being China's useful idiots.
Next let's look at emissions per capita.
You often hear "well Chinese people don't emit that much, in the UK we're far more wasteful etc".
In reality Chinese EPC overtook the UK a decade ago. Today the average Chinese person emits nearly 2x the average UK person.
The only reason the myth persists is because of the ignorance of activists in the UK who cannot conceive of a nation of over a billion avid consumers in a thriving economy. In their heads China is still full of peasant farmers.
So i've been turning a thought over in my head and wanted some feedback. It relates to people who are intrinsically motivated by their work.
1/n
In my model these types of workers fall into two categories: 1. Craftspeople - Motivated to produce quality work for the sake of the work itself. 2. Activists - Motivated to do work because they have a moral drive and work is their vehicle.
As a GenX, I came up through the workforce at a time where Craftspeople were ascendant. You derived personal satisfaction and professional status (and earnings) based on the quality of your work.
3/n
Noticed how tech companies are extraordinarily good places to work because they're so accommodating? Seriously, if you look at things like remote work etc (eg. Amazon only needs you to be within 24 hrs of an office for a physical meeting) tech is incredibly generous.
We didn't get here through organised labour, we got here because these wonderful perks are a side effect of tech companies doing everything they can to attract and accommodate the really outstanding employees.
This is pretty much the opposite of historical efforts of organised labour where you gather a lot of very average and ultimately replaceable labour and negotiate collectively.
Instead companies focus on a handful of really valuable employees & everyone gets a slice of largesse.
Evolution of a tech cluster:
Beers & laptops in bedroom
Holy crap XYZ got VC funding
Holy crap so did ABC
We're the next Silicon Valley (laughs)
Local paper says we're the next SV (awkward laughs)
We have our own VCs now
National paper says we're the next SV (stop saying that)
First acquihires! Hooray
First M&A exit! Hooray
Our first accelerator
God who are all these VCs?
Second M&A exit? Hooray
God here come the corporates
Why do we need another 12 accelerators?
More M&A
Why to tech companies keep selling?
First IPO! Hooray
Saturation bombing of VC
I can't rent space
I can't find talent
Why aren't the exits bigger?
This place has changed man, it's lost its soul
"Why I'm leaving [cluster]" blogposts
"Have you seen [new cluster]?" blogposts
"Decentralisation is the new cluster" blogposts
Beers and laptops in bedroom