Scientists have always had their prejudices, ideological biases and blind spots, but almost by definition regarded those as bad things to be minimised.
The insistence on subjecting all of science to ideological tests means maximising prejudice instead.
My, how we all laughed when Alan Sokal hoaxed a social science journal into publishing a paper ‘liberally salted with nonsense’ that ‘flattered the editors’ ideological preconceptions’.
Little did we realise that verbose and vapid social deconstruction was coming for physics.
In a new book, The War on Science, edited by the astrophysicist Lawrence Krauss, 31 scientists and scholars lament the corruption of their field by left-wing ideological nonsense. Whereas once a book with this title would have raged at the conservative right pushing creationism and sexism in the teeth of truth, now it is exposing the woke left pushing identity ideology and intersectionality at the expense of reason. @LKrauss1 @RichardDawkins @sapinker @GadSaad
Hilariously, the ideologues have painted themselves into an awkward corner in their attempts to decolonise mathematics. They demand non-western slants on algebra and algorithms, which are words of Arabic origin
Meanwhile, New Zealand now requires schools to teach indigenous Maori ‘ways of knowing’ as equivalent to scientific ones. So creationism is fine if brown people do it?
Many scientists continue to do good work unperturbed by this revolt against critical thinking. But the sheer volume of funding, publishing and attention that is being siphoned off into this pathology represents a massive opportunity cost. Grants are being spent, papers retracted, scientists sanctioned, hiring practices altered and peer reviews corrupted, while scientists are self-censoring to prevent their cancellation.
It is now clear that embracing ideology over truth directly led to scientists misleading us during the pandemic. ‘I hate when politics is injected into science, but it’s impossible not to, especially given the circumstance,’ wrote Kristian Andersen
Science has always behaved like a cult to some extent, enforcing dogma and persecuting heretics, but it has grown far worse with wokery. Science as a philosophy is still great, but science as an institution is about as true to its philosophy as the church was under the Borgias, and as ripe for reformation.
"We buried a miracle in paperwork. Since the 1970s building a new reactor has effectively been illegal in America. It required $30 billion and 15+ years in regulatory hell," writes Stephen Mcbride in @RationalOptSoc.
🧵
"I bring good news. On my recent travels through Austin and Detroit I met the world’s best nuclear entrepreneurs. This was the first time they’ve ever said the following to me (and they all agreed):"
“Regulation is finally becoming a solved problem.
One founder said his microreactor (a small nuclear reactor, or “SMR”) could be up and running next year."
"Let me place you inside a taxi travelling to Geneva airport on 12 February 2020. Inside the cab are two people. One is Dr Peter Daszak, the $400,000-a-year head of the EcoHealth Alliance, an organisation that boasted about funnelling millions of dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to harvest wild bat viruses and do risky experiments on them.
He and his organisation would later be debarred from federal funding by the Biden administration for failing to divulge vital information about EcoHealth’s support for suspiciously risky gain-of-function experiments on close relatives of the virus that caused Covid.
The other is Dr (now Sir) Jeremy Farrar, the then head of the Wellcome Trust, the world’s largest charitable funder of scientific research, and now head of science at the World Health Organisation (WHO)...."
"In the taxi, Farrar wants the issue ‘put to bed’, even though he knows the last hope of finding evidence for a natural origin of the virus – the pangolin theory – has already fallen apart. That’s because the pangolin virus lacks the very addition that alarmed the scientists about Covid, a thing called a furin cleavage site."
"Five days after his taxi ride, Farrar would indeed help ‘put to bed’ the lab-leak theory by reading the draft paper (written at his suggestion, remember) and asking that the authors change the wording from ‘unlikely’ to ‘improbable’. He then promises to ‘push’ the paper towards a major journal, Nature Medicine, all while refusing to be listed as either an author or in the acknowledgements. That itself is a breach of scientific ethics."
Britain's net-zero-obsessed energy policy came unstuck this week in six different ways:
1. Donald (Drill Baby Drill) Trump tore up electric-vehicle mandates and turned decisively against wind power. America, China and India are all going to increase their emissions by much more than we can possibly save.
2. Chris Wright testified how the shale revolution has turned America into now the world’s biggest producer of both oil and gas, ahead of even Saudi Arabia and Russia. That could have been our boom too.
Five years ago today, five things happened in Wuhan. 🧵
1. Doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital, Dr Ai Fen and Dr Li Wenliang, blew the whistle on the growing number of SARS-related coronavirus infections. They put a warning out on WeChat.
Both were severely reprimanded. Dr Ai was told: “You disregard the results of Wuhan’s urban construction since the [World] Military Games; you are a sinner affecting Wuhan’s stability and unity; you are the culprit undermining the City of Wuhan’s forward development.”
Dr Li was forced to sign a humiliating confession of sharing “untruthful information”. He later died of the infection, which came to be called Covid.
After bad floods in 1957 the Spanish government built a string of dams in the hills to hold back water and diverted the Turia river away from Valencia. For more than six decades the system worked well. Why did it fail this year?
The Spanish government has been removing dams at a furious rate. Under a European Union programme to encourage the restoration of rivers to their wild state for the benefit of fish migration, in 2021 it got rid of 108 dams and weirs; in 2022, another 133.
Worse is the failure to build at Cheste, specifically designed to prevent flooding, to ‘regulate the flows coming from the upper basin of the Poyo and Pozalet ravines’. It was approved in 2001 as part of a National Hydrological Plan.
No, there is no new evidence that Covid originated with a raccoon dog in a market in Wuhan. The public relations blitz that surrounded the publication this week of a paper in Cell from a team whose previous papers have been debunked caught some headlines, as it was designed to do.
The market theory is still implausible, as George Gao, the man who led the investigation of that market, Ralph Baric, the world’s leading coronavirologist, and many others insist.
The new study says there were mammals on sale in the market. We knew that: it was in our book published three years ago. It says there was SARS-CoV-2 in the market; yup, also in our book.