I realise it has been a very difficult day* for anyone invested in the building of a new left party. *If you don’t know what I’m talking about, I envy you. Some people have been asking privately, but I don’t really have any info to add apart from what is in the public domain. 1/9
All I can say is that whatever happens is over the next few days - and I would hope that people on all sides can take responsibility for picking up the phone &
starting some dialogue … 2/9
- there will still be a need for the party that we’ve discussed & debated & got excited about over the past months & years. That doesn’t go away, just because there is conflict, painful though that - especially when it’s played out in public. 3/9
When I worked for @jeremycorbyn & Laura, there were many, many high tension scenarios, times she it looked like things were falling apart. I always used to say that the harder, and more chaotic it seemed, the calmer we should all be. 4/9
That isn’t to gloss over what’s happened. It’s bad & disappointing. But I’ve talked to & researched other left party formations across Europe & this kind of thing happens more than you’d think. 5/9
The conflicts might appear to be trivial, but they often have political roots & they work themselves out eventually. The key thing is that there are enough people, on the ground that are prepared to put it right, and I think there are. 6/9
I cannot give advice to people about what to do about their Your Party membership, but I’m quite clear that no one has been defrauded & believe what @zarahsultana has said on the security of monies paid etc. 7/9
So, it seems to me that, counter to what we’re all encouraged to do on social media, we should hang on & let the dust settle a bit. Then have a bit of a reset. What kind of party do we want & what kind of culture do we want to build together? 8/9
It’s not going to be easy, of course, but a grassroots, democratic party doesn’t belong to individuals, but to us all, as a collective.
Now I’m off for a pint with my friends & off to St James’ Park in the hope that Newcastle Utd vs Barcelona can provide some cheer. #HWTL 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 I realise that many people get frustrated talking about past events (‘old history’), especially when we are supposed to be ‘moving on’. The past is the past, right? Why stir things up?
But I’m afraid that isn’t the way it works. 1/
Because sometimes the events that happen and political decisions that are made are important, not just because of the circumstances at the time & the outcome of those events, but because of the lessons we learn from them about the way we do our politics. 2/
If we constantly skip over these lessons, without analysing why mistakes happened, we cannot claim to be intelligent socialists & it’s likely we’ll be stuck in a cycle of defeats. It’s the old mantra, “those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." 3/
For anyone still parroting the ‘both sides’ nonsense, don’t take our word for it. Pick up any neutral, straightforward, factual book on the Israeli-Palestine conflict and read about 77 years of occupation, oppression, violence, bombing, forced removal, displacement … (1/5)
… apartheid, village demolitions, daily military harassment, erection of walls, illegal settlements, extra judicial killings, ethnic cleansing, mass imprisonment, endless war crimes, economic blockade, UN resolutions ignored, peace treaties ripped up. (2/5)
And, if your interest is piqued, you can read about how the British created this, via the Balfour Declaration. I recommend the below, by Michael Scott-Baumann, which hardly even makes an argument, but gives you the facts. (3/5)
A couple of summers ago, I spent a few weeks researching the formation of parties of the left, mostly in Europe but also from around the world. (1/8)
Almost all were born as coalitions (a combination of groups leaving the main social democratic party & independent socialists, left greens & factions / smaller parties). None of it was easy. The negotiations were torturous, the fallings out were numerous & splits common. (2/8)
But the ones that came through to form a coherent alternative were the ones where there was a big enough core to ride the wave & plant roots. (3/8)
Starmer’s statement, talking about “appalling scenes” and a “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza, apart from being the height of hypocrisy, is depressingly emblematic of a wider body of opinion amongst our political class. 1/7
It is an attitude that refuses to acknowledge the UK’s direct complicity in the creation of these “appalling scenes” - a narrative which talks about the medical needs of children as if it was a natural disaster. But it’s also in denial of history. 2/7
Let’s just pause & reflect on the fact that the UK is still supplying components for the bombs that have devastated whole cities in Gaza, and continue to do so today. 3/7
Of course @Keir_Starmer & all the people around him understand that the way people experience racism is different. They may play dumb, but this isn’t about that. (1/5)
It’s actually about the maintenance of a hierarchy of racism which has been so central to the Starmer project. Antisemitism is not just at the top of the tree, but the only one that is allowed to be discussed with any seriousness by the political and media class. (2/5)
They cannot allow a discussion (led by @HackneyAbbott or anyone else) to be had about the detailed operation of other racisms, and especially the unique impact that anti-black racism & Islamophobia has had … (3/5)
One of the very predictable outcomes of Labour’s proscription of Palestine Action & the abuse of anti-terrorist legislation was that the police would fail to grasp the difference between, say, holding a Palestine flag, or signs saying “Israel is committing genocide” … 1/8
… and supporting a proscribed organisation. This is exactly what’s happened in Kent, with one officer telling Laura Murton:
“Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.” 2/8
This bright spark said that the phrase “Free Gaza” was “supportive of Palestine Action” & it was an offence “to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, namely Palestine Action is an offence under section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act”. 3/8