Yesterday, Rep. Cory Mills (@RepMillsPress) voted against censuring Ilhan Omar for suggesting Charlie Kirk was to blame for his own murder.
Rep. Mills must resign. He has a conflict of interest and cannot represent his constituents faithfully.
A thread.
Ilhan Omar is loathed by Republican voters, and her comments about Charlie were beyond the pale. This should have been straightforward.
But Rep. Mills claimed that First Amendment concerns guided his vote - and implied that Charlie himself would agree.
One doubts that this is Rep. Mills' actual rationale. For one, Nancy Mace claims that he threatened her over text last night. (Rep. Mace authored the censure resolution against Omar.) Hard to imagine he cares about Ilhan Omar *that much*. So what's really going on here?
Well, Axios reported yesterday before the vote that Democrats had a simple plan to stop Omar from being censured: threaten to censure Rep. Mills in return.
Mr. Mills has a lot of scandals - all of which have been publicly reported on. Perhaps he was worried that a censure resolution would give those scandals new oxygen. So let's go through the censure resolution and talk about what Mr. Mills might have been afraid of.
First, the censure resolution alleges that Rep. Mills assaulted his girlfriend in February of this year.
Public reporting on this is pretty damning. Police responded to a disturbance call at Mills' DC Penthouse, and found Mills' girlfriend in the lobby "physically shaking and scared" and with "bruises on her arm which appeared fresh."
Mills' girlfriend later retracted her statements, and Mills wasn't charged. But this incident had a number of other ramifications: first, it revealed that Mills was still married (which his staff was unaware of).
It also led to Mills' other girlfriend - Lindsey Langston, a former Miss United States - to break up with him.
Rep. Mills apparently did not take this well, and threatened to publish revenge porn of her if she were to start dating someone else.
Reporting from the Blaze is, again, damning. According to texts reviewed by the Blaze Mills repeatedly threatened to release sexual videos of Langston.
Finally, there are allegations of stolen valor.
The censure resolution focuses on one specific issue: allegations that Mills lied about the events related to his Bronze Star.
But there's more on the stolen valor front.
In his application to work for DynCorp, a military contractor similar to Blackwater, Rep. Mills claimed that he was an Army Ranger. This was false.
After one incident involving military contractors, Dyncorp demanded (at the request of the State Department) that employees substantiate the claims in their resumes. His colleagues said that in lieu of this, he simply left his gear on his bed and walked off the job.
Mr. Mills also claimed that he had been to a military sniper school, but his colleagues who went through DynCorp training with him said he did not have the basic understanding of sniper practice that any graduate of those schools would have.
Mr. Mills also claimed that he had been "blown up" twice in Iraq, including in his campaign videos. However, the in the second incident he apparently based this claim on, he was not in the vehicle that was hit by an IED and suffered no injuries.
And this is not even the end of the scandals involving Rep. Mills. There's also the fact that he was married by a radical Islamist cleric, and serious allegations that he converted to Islam around the time of said marriage.
To sum up: Mr. Mills is clearly operating under a conflict of interest. His constituents certainly wanted Ilhan Omar censured. And yet he was 1 of only 4 Republicans to vote against @RepNancyMace's resolution, and threatened Rep. Mace to boot - clearly to avoid personal consequences.
When lawyers operate under a conflict of interest, and put their own personal interests ahead of their client's, they can be disbarred. The analogy works here.
In fact, for the purposes of whether he should resign, it almost doesn't matter whether any or all of the above allegations are true (though as the attached screenshots suggest, they are quite well-substantiated). What matters is that they are creating an irreconcilable tension between Rep. Mills' personal interests and the interests of his voters, making him incapable of representing them faithfully. And this is not a hypothetical conflict; Rep. Mills vote last night makes it clear that this is a severe, actual conflict of interest.
Rep. Mills must do the honorable thing and resign.
I couldn't have put together this thread without the incredible investigative reporting done by @TheBlaze. They deserve enormous credit for their brave work, and you should subscribe - $5 a month is nothing.
With Kilmar Abrego Garcia back in the news, we are already seeing a mountain of bull coming from lefty immigration advocates.
Let's go back into the weeds a bit, and go through some of the falsehoods put into the press by his lawyers and agitators.
🧵
First, there were claims that Abrego Garcia had legal status in the United States. These were always false. Abrego Garcia only had withholding of removal to El Salvador. He is an illegal alien whose asylum claim was denied.
Second, there were (and are) claims that there is no evidence that Abrego Garcia was in MS-13. This is false. There is substantial evidence that he was a member, as I demonstrated in this thread.
Under @RepMariaSalazar's bill, the wife-beating illegal alien MS-13 gang banging human trafficker Kilmar Abrego Garcia could be granted citizenship by a future Democrat administration, with no further changes to American law.
A thread with citations explaining how.
Let's start with the basics of his admissibility. Abrego Garcia entered the United States in 2011 at the age of 16.
That makes him eligible for the Dreamer program under the bill. It doesn't matter that he came on his own volition.
At this point, you might note that he hasn't been continuously present in the United States because he was removed to El Salvador.
Lucky for Kilmar, there's an exception to the continuous presence requirement if you were previously removed.
Let's tell YET ANOTHER story about Kilmar Abrego-Garcia and his alleged membership in MS-13 - and his lawyer playing fast and loose with the facts.
In last night's thread, I explained how Abrego-Garcia's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, underplayed the evidence that Abrego Garcia was a member of MS-13 contained in the Gang Field Interview Sheet (GFIS).
One of the key parts of the GFIS was the assertion of a confidential informant that Abrego-Garcia was a member of the "Westerns clique" of MS-13, including his rank and moniker. This would be pretty definitive, if true.
How did Sandoval-Moshenberg deal with this in his complaint? Well, he asserted, without equivocation, that the Westerns Clique of MS-13 "operates in Brentwood Long Island, in New York, a state that Plaintiff Abrego Garcia has never lived in."
If true, that would be pretty devastating to the credibility of the confidential informant! And indeed, both Judge Thacker's 4th Circuit opinion and Judge Xinis' district court opinion cite this specific point to discredit the evidence that Abrego-Garcia is in MS-13.
Given how fast and loose Sandoval-Moshenberg played with the GFIS, I decided to try and find the basis for his claim that the DOJ said the Westerns Clique only operates in New York.
When you search "Western Clique" on DOJ's website, all that comes up is one particular MS-13 double murder. But there's no claim by DOJ here that the Western Clique only operates in Long Island - it just says that two particular members of the Western Clique were murdered in Long Island.
Let's tell another story about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. This one has to do with his lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, and how a 4th Circuit judge (and the entire media) effectively got duped into underplaying the evidence that Abrego-Garcia was in MS-13.
Today, AG Bondi released the underlying Gang Field Interview Sheet (GFIS) related to Abrego Garcia's detainment in 2019, along with other documents.
In the GFIS, the police officer attests that when Abrego-Garcia was arrested, he was hanging out with multiple confirmed MS-13 members, that he was wearing apparel associated with MS-13, and that a confidential source independently identified Abrego-Garcia's membership in MS-13 along with his rank and moniker in the organization.
Interestingly, when Judge Thacker wrote her concurring opinion in the 4th Circuit decision that ruled for Abrego-Garcia, she was extremely dismissive of the evidence that he was in MS-13. She said it was "thin, to say the least," and made no mention of the fact that Abrego-Garcia was detained while hanging out with two other members of MS-13.
Why was that omitted? Well, let's take a look at her footnotes.
Let's tell the story of Kilmer Armado Abrego-Garcia, the "Maryland Father" (read: likely member of MS-13) who was removed to El Salvador, and who The Atlantic (and apparently the entire political left) are demanding be returned to the United States.
First: his detention. He was detained in March 2019 and charged with removability. Abrego Garcia is a "native and citizen" of El Salvador. He crossed the border illegally in 2012, and was thus removable - totally independently of whether he was in MS-13.
The finding that he was a member of MS-13 only came up because he asked for bond. The immigration judge reviewed the evidence and found that it "show[ed] he is a verified member of MS-13." and therefore that Abrego-Garcia did not demonstrate "that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others."