I wrote an appendix on Shivaji’s lineage titled “Bhonsles Are Not Sisodiya Rajputs”. It was about halfway done, nearly 40-50% complete, and Shri Gajanan B. Mehendale had already approved it.
He guided me through it with patience and care, but before I could finish, destiny took him away. My dream was to have my entire book approved by him. Now that dream feels broken.
I keep telling myself I cannot do this without him, yet deep down I know he would never have wanted me to stop. He was always there for small writers like me, never dismissive, always ready to answer even the silliest of questions with calmness.
I met him one last time in December 2024. He offered me tea, and I refused out of respect for his time. I told him, “It would be an honor to drink tea made by you, but I will save that for next time.” I didn’t know there would be no next time. That thought haunts me now.
I used to call him directly. Every call lasted at least twenty minutes. I often got so overwhelmed that I would interrupt him because I wanted to know more. Still, he answered patiently, guiding me and even telling me exactly where things were written.
That was the kind of teacher he was.
Now that voice is gone. That support is gone. I have lost my teacher, and I feel hopeless. I started writing because of him, and now writing feels empty without him. It will take me a very long time to accept that he is no more.
I wonder if he is watching us, and I fear that if he sees us in despair, it might sadden him. His death was not in his hands. It was not his fault. He had bigger plans for the days ahead, but life didn’t allow him to fulfill them.
The only way forward is for us to gather ourselves and continue the work he believed in. That is the tribute he deserves. We all know one truth: there will never be anyone like him again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Shambhuji's defection is a strategic maneuver rather than a genuine shift in allegiance.
The Adilshahi source, Basatin-us-Salatin, explicitly indicates that Shambhuji made false promises to Dilir Khan regarding the acquisition of Maratha territory and forts. 🧵-
Jadunath Sarkar provides a clear assessment of Shambhuji's position within Dilir Khan's camp.
It is evident that Shambhuji did not consider himself a servant of the Mughal Empire.
The 7 Hazari Mansabdari was merely nominal or namesake.
An important yet often overlooked piece of contemporary evidence is the Parmanandakavya, which explicitly states that Shivaji ordered Shambhuji when to go and when to come from Dilir Khan's camp.
When Shambhuji was captured and killed by Aurangzeb, Khafi Khan noted that Shambhuji engaged in the reprehensible act of violating women while seated on a bench where his father, Shivaji, offered them fruit and conversed with them as if they were his own mothers and sisters.
Khafi Khan asserts that while he, referring to himself as the author, was staying with Abdu-r Razzak Lari near Raigad, he heard this report and clearly identified himself as a hearsay source.
(Khafi Khan is not an eyewitness because he himself says he heard these things.)
Examining the Controversy Surrounding Chhatrapati Shambhu Maharaj: A Historical Perspective
Read this thread to understand the depth of falsehood. 🧵
Chhatrapati Shambhu, a.k.a Sambhaji, was the first son of Chhatrapati Shivaji. The young prince Shambhu was the heir apparent of Hindavi Swarajya. His good character is noted by foreign biographers. However, suddenly after 1676, his character became questionable in some documents
Before 1676, there was no mention of misbehavior by Shambhuji. Not a single document speaks poorly of Shambhuji before 1676. So, what happened suddenly that led to Shambhuji being degraded by his contemporaries?
We will understand that in this long thread.
On page 66 of the Storia do Mogor by Niccolao Manucci, it is mentioned that Aurangzeb departed from Delhi to Kashmir in 1660.
On the same page, Manucci says that François Bernier made an error in writing the year as 1664.
Manucci also accuses François Bernier of writing things in history that are far from the truth.