Thread by @FinalTelegraph

Let's be precise. There is no such thing as "hate speech" in the United States. It does not exist in the Constitution. It is a fraudulent term, a political weapon invented by the Left to do one thing: silence dissent. This thread is a deconstruction of their most dangerous lie. 🧵

The American Founders were not naive. They understood that a free republic must tolerate the speech it despises. The First Amendment is not a protection for popular, agreeable ideas; it is a barricade for the offensive, the blasphemous, and the "hateful." This is a sign of civilizational strength, not weakness.

"Hate speech," as a concept, has no consistent definition. Its true meaning is simple: it is any speech that the progressive Left hates. It is a subjective, ever-shifting standard designed to pathologize and ultimately criminalize any thought that deviates from their current ideological catechism.

The hypocrisy of its application exposes the game. Rep. Ilhan Omar can deploy thinly-veiled antisemitic tropes about money and dual loyalty, and the establishment rushes to her defense, calling it a "learning experience." Her brand of hate speech gets a pass because it serves the correct political narrative.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve now has a governor, Lisa Cook, whose academic career is built upon the tenets of Critical Race Theory. This is an ideology that promotes racial division and collective guilt. It is a form of state-sanctioned, anti-white hate speech, laundered as elite economic policy.

Remember when Barack Obama, with patrician condescension, described working-class Pennsylvanians as "bitter" people who "cling to guns or religion"? This was an expression of profound hate and contempt for a huge swath of America. But from an elite, it is merely considered a keen observation.

There is no such thing as hate speech. But if there were, hate speech is the vocabulary the Left uses to dehumanize its opposition. "Racist." "Fascist." "Bigot." "Deplorable." These are not arguments; they are slurs designed to strip their targets of their humanity, creating a permission structure for harassment and political violence.

This obsession with policing language has a dark historical precedent. The first act of any totalitarian movement is to seize control of the dictionary. The Soviets had "counter-revolutionary speech." The Jacobins had "enemies of the people." The modern Left has "hate speech." It is the same tyrannical impulse.

This plague was born in the university. It is the logical endpoint of critical theory, a toxic philosophy that rejects reason in favor of power dynamics. It escaped the academic laboratory and has now infected every major institution in the West, from corporations to the government itself.

The goal of "hate speech" laws is not safety; it is power. It gives the state and its corporate allies the authority to be the sole arbiters of acceptable thought. It is a tool to crush dissent and enforce ideological conformity under the benevolent guise of "protecting" people.

The notion that offensive words constitute "violence" is perhaps the most infantile and dangerous lie of our time. It is the doctrine of a generation raised to believe they have a right not to be offended. This conflation of words and actions is a deliberate strategy to justify censorship.

A culture that obsesses over banning "hate speech" is a culture that has lost its confidence. A strong, vibrant belief system can withstand any challenge or insult. A weak, brittle, and intellectually bankrupt ideology—like modern progressivism—requires a blasphemy law to protect it from scrutiny.

The true antidote to speech you find hateful is not censorship; it is more speech. It is the deployment of better arguments, sharper wit, and more compelling truths. The Left fears this open combat in the marketplace of ideas because they know their positions cannot withstand the rigors of debate.

We must refuse to use their language. Reject the term "hate speech" entirely. Correct those who use it. Frame it for what it is: a fraudulent pretext for censorship. Do not grant their premise. The moment you do, you have already lost the argument.

This is a central battle of our time. It is a contest between the robust, confident tradition of American free expression and the brittle, fearful, European-style impulse to control thought. Between a culture that trusts its citizens with liberty and one that treats them as children.

We must choose the former. We must defend the right of our enemies to speak, not because we agree with them, but because our own freedom depends on it. A republic that is afraid of words is a republic that is no longer worthy of the name. Choose freedom over "safety." Let the Left speak. Let them destroy themselves and show us who they really are. DEMONS.

If you like my content please consider buying a copy of Saggezza Eterna. Read the intro free on Amazon using the link: Thanks to your support we are now Number One in new releases in our category and on the first page of "The Philosophy of Good and Evil" ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐amazon.com/dp/B0FGXMWRYP