They project their sins onto us, endlessly shrieking about "incitement" and "violence" from the Right. But look closely. The Left has cultivated, celebrated, and normalized an atmosphere of extreme political violence among themselves. This thread exposes their hypocrisy with the EXACT examples. Arrest them. 🧵🧵
The hypocrisy begins at the very top. Remember when Joe Biden, current President of the United States, fantasized about wanting to "beat up the president"? This wasn't a joke; it was a clear statement of aggressive intent, delivered with a smirk that normalized political thuggery.
And his party's rising star, Cory Booker, openly declared he wanted to "punch the president." This is not civil discourse. This is the language of the street thug, celebrated by the liberal elite when directed at their political opponents.
Then there's the high priestess of confrontation, Maxine Waters. She literally urged her supporters, "If you see anybody from that (Trump) Cabinet in a restaurant... you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere." This is a direct incitement to harassment and intimidation.
The entertainment wing of the Left is even more depraved. Jimmy Kimmel, their late-night hero, openly jokes about assassinating the president. This isn't comedy; it's a normalization of the most extreme forms of political fantasy.
And Snoop Dogg didn't just "joke." He produced a music video depicting a fake assassination of the president, shooting him in the head with a toy gun. Imagine the outrage if a conservative artist had done this to Obama. The double standard is deafening.
Kathy Griffin went even further, posing with a severed, bloody head of the president. This wasn't a mistake; it was a calculated act of grotesque political theater, celebrating violence against a sitting president. And the Left, initially, defended her "art."
Even Hollywood's royalty got in on the act. Johnny Depp publicly "jokes about assassinating the President." These aren't isolated incidents. This is a pattern of behavior that tells the Left's base that such fantasies are not only acceptable but celebrated.
Madonna, the aging pop star, declared she wanted to "blow up the White House." Again, imagine the reaction if a conservative had said this about a Democratic administration. The media would have universally condemned it as a terrorist threat.
At the street level, the chants become explicit. "Black Lives Matter" rallies, which the Left championed as "peaceful protests," included chilling chants like "they want dead cops and fry 'em like bacon." This is pure incitement to violence against law enforcement.
And we saw the consequences. Antifa routinely assaults conservatives. They don't debate; they beat. They don't protest; they riot. And the Democratic Party, from its leaders to its media enablers, consistently provides cover for their terroristic actions.
Then there's the unhinged rhetoric from figures like AOC, who calls our border agents "Nazis" and refuses to condemn violence against them. Such language dehumanizes opponents and provides moral justification for violent action.
The so-called "Squad" openly supports terrorists of Palestine and Hamas, while routinely spewing antisemitic rhetoric themselves. This is not just bad foreign policy; it is the legitimization of extremist groups that advocate violence.
The complete refusal of Congress to call out Ilhan Omar for making overt antisemitic remarks about money and Jewish loyalty is another shameful example. They tolerate what they call "hate speech" if it were to come from the right, even though it does not exist in reality. But when it comes from their own ranks and serves their agenda, they accept it.
And let's not forget the pure, unadulterated contempt. Rashida Tlaib, a sitting member of Congress, calls the president a "motherf**ker." This is the decorum of the Left, a party that pretends to champion civility.
So, when the Left—after years of this—points at Donald Trump and calls him the one inciting hatred and violence? Really, loony libs? The gaslighting is breathtaking. The evidence is clear. The violence comes from within your ranks. Stand tall fellow patriots. Together we will cast the demons back to Hell.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EXPOSED: Democrats' Deadly Playbook – How They Justify Murdering Opponents by Calling Them 'Monsters' (And Get Away With It)
I. Buckle up, patriots—this thread will shatter the illusion. In the wake of Charlie Kirk's brutal assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, Democrats claim to "condemn violence" while refusing to denounce the rhetoric that inspired it. We'll dissect how the Left demonizes conservatives as "fascists" and "threats to democracy," paving the way for bloodshed—all while clutching their moral high ground like a stolen election. If you're tired of the hypocrisy, read on. But first: Did you know 29% of Democrats admit supporting political violence? Shocking, right? Let's dive deeper.
II. History doesn't lie—demonization is the Left's oldest trick. Remember when Biden labeled MAGA Republicans "semi-fascists" in 2022? Or Hillary Clinton calling Trump supporters "deplorables"? This isn't just trash talk; it's strategic dehumanization, straight from Saul Alinsky's playbook. By painting conservatives as subhuman threats, they justify any action against us. Fast forward to 2025: Charlie Kirk, gunned down by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson during a campus speech. Kirk wasn't armed; he was armed with ideas. Yet, the Left's nonstop vilification made him a target. How many more before we call it what it is—incitement? Hold on, the examples pile up.
III. Take the 2017 shooting of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise at a congressional baseball practice. The shooter? A rabid Bernie Sanders supporter who ranted against Republicans online. Scalise nearly died, yet Democrats like Maxine Waters doubled down, urging followers to "confront" Trump officials in public. No real reckoning. Fast-forward to Trump's two assassination attempts in 2024: Butler, PA, where a bullet grazed his ear, and Florida, where a would-be killer lurked. Biden's response? Tepid at best, while his party kept screeching about Trump as a "dictator." Pattern emerging? It's not coincidence—it's calculation. But why stop at politicians?
The most successful lie Big Tech ever sold the American people is that the H-1B visa is for "the best and the brightest." It is not. It is a corrupt system for replacing American workers with cheap, indentured foreign labor. This thread is a demolition of that lie. 🧵
The defining parable of the H-1B program is the story of Disney. They laid off hundreds of their American IT workers, then forced them, under threat of withholding severance, to train their cheaper foreign replacements. This is not a program for innovation; it is a program for corporate cruelty.
The "skills gap" is a convenient fiction crafted by corporate lobbyists. There is no shortage of talented American STEM graduates. There is, however, a shortage of corporations willing to pay a competitive American wage when they can import a cheaper, more pliable alternative.
The system is dominated by a handful of foreign outsourcing firms, or "body shops," like Tata and Infosys. These visa mills flood the H-1B lottery with tens of thousands of applications for mid-level positions, turning the entire program into a pipeline for cheap, outsourced IT grunt work.
The H-1B visa creates a class of modern-day indentured servants. Because a worker's legal status is tied directly to their employer, they are far less likely to demand raises, report abuse, or change jobs. This creates a captive workforce that American citizens are then forced to compete against.
The economic result is simple and brutal: wage depression. By artificially flooding the labor market, the H-1B program suppresses salaries for all American tech workers and makes it exponentially harder for our own university graduates to land their first job. It is a direct assault on the American middle class.
This is a profound betrayal of our own children. We tell them to study hard in science and technology, promising them a prosperous future. Then, our government runs a visa program that allows corporations to tell those same kids, "Sorry, we found someone from Bangalore who will do it for less."
While the nation mourns an assassinated patriot, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez takes to the House floor to dance on his grave. Her "we condemn, but..." statement is the most cowardly and ghoulish form of victim-blaming I have ever witnessed. Let's dismantle the lies of a political ghoul, piece by piece.
The "condemn, but..." formulation is the classic refrain of the revolutionary who secretly condones the violence. It is a hollow throat-clearing before the real argument: that the victim, in some way, "had it coming." AOC’s supposed condemnation is a transparently false prelude to her real purpose: defaming a dead man.
Her first lie: Kirk's "mistake" comment on the Civil Rights Act. She maliciously omits that he was making a nuanced libertarian argument about the expansion of federal power, even quoting MLK Jr.'s own skepticism of state solutions. She is either too intellectually lazy to grasp the point or she is deliberately lying.
Let's be precise. There is no such thing as "hate speech" in the United States. It does not exist in the Constitution. It is a fraudulent term, a political weapon invented by the Left to do one thing: silence dissent. This thread is a deconstruction of their most dangerous lie. 🧵
The American Founders were not naive. They understood that a free republic must tolerate the speech it despises. The First Amendment is not a protection for popular, agreeable ideas; it is a barricade for the offensive, the blasphemous, and the "hateful." This is a sign of civilizational strength, not weakness.
"Hate speech," as a concept, has no consistent definition. Its true meaning is simple: it is any speech that the progressive Left hates. It is a subjective, ever-shifting standard designed to pathologize and ultimately criminalize any thought that deviates from their current ideological catechism.
The Left ever brands their street thugs "anti-fascists." It is a lie of Orwellian stupidity. In reality, they have adopted every tactic of the 20th-century fascists they claim to oppose. This thread is a field guide to the real fascists of our time.
Trump called them terrorists years ago—laughed off by the spineless elite. Portland 2020, Antifa thugs chase and beat a fleeing man senseless, stomping him for daring to exist. Watch the videos below and decide who the real fascists are...
Remember when the media gaslit us that Antifa was just "passionate protesters"? Cut to Atlanta 2023: These organized militants use a vigil as cover to torch a car, coordinated like Hitler's Brownshirts plotting a purge. Trump saw through the facade—designating them terrorists was mercy. Hypocrites in DC shielded them; now, truth burns brighter. Video proof:
Antifa's "decentralized" myth? A lie to dodge the noose. Watch Philly 2018: Masked mobs swarm Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens, shrieking "f*ck white supremacy" while hurling fists at peaceful speakers. Echoes of fascist street brawls in 1930s Berlin—silencing dissent with violence. Trump nailed it: They're terrorists, not activists. The left's selective amnesia? Pathetic. Clip:
Long Awaited Thread on one of the biggest clowns in world politics, Keir Starmer 🧵
Britain isn't led by a Prime Minister—it's adrift in a septic tank of spineless incompetence, helmed by Sir Keir Starmer, the sniveling pond-scum chameleon of Westminster, a gutless lawyer-turned-loser whose sole conviction is cowering behind focus groups while Britain burns. Once a prosecutor who let rape gangs roam free on his watch at the CPS, now he's the hollowed-out husk peddling "delivery, delivery, delivery" like a malfunctioning Roomba bumping into walls of his own U-turns—from gutting welfare bills in humiliating rebellions to surrendering Gibraltar's sovereignty to the EU in a Chamberlain-level cringe.
Charisma-free as a damp sock, he's the first PM to get boo'd by England fans chanting his name like a curse, his approval ratings rotting lower than Macron's while plots to dethrone this visionless puppet fester in his own party. A pusillanimous plagiarist of Powell's poison on immigration, fixated on Palestinian photo-ops as migrant hotels overflow and two-tier policing fans far-right flames he lit himself.
Useless? He's the gold standard—impotent, pathetic, a waste of oxygen staining. With his Epstein-adjacent scandals and Mandelson meltdowns. This isn't critique; it's the autopsy of a political corpse, exposing the spineless fraud who turned hope into a national hangover.
Let us not forget this man's origin story. He was the loyal servant of the Marxist Jeremy Corbyn, campaigning on the most far-left manifesto in modern history. He promised to nationalize everything and bend the knee to the unions. He believed it then, or he was lying. Which is worse?
The moment he seized power, the great purge began. The "Ten Pledges" he made to his own party members were systematically abandoned. He jettisoned every socialist principle he once championed. This was not an evolution; it was the cold, calculated act of an unprincipled apparatchik (apparatchik means a full-time, professional functionary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union).