This essay--a dissection of the ongoing PLA purge--is one of the best pieces of a "Pekingology" I have ever read. Well argued, well written, complete command of the biographies of the Chinese elite married to a solid and clear eyed analytic framework.
Next time somebody asks me "what does a good analyses of Chinese political fights look like?" I will send them this piece. Gold standard for how this should be done.
1) Chinese industrial policy is often run out of cities and smaller localities who are *competing against each other* for both market share and central government support.
Very few US states have their own industrial policies (much less major cities). Far from being a cutthroat competition our industrial policy impulse is to prop up the biggest firm and leave it at that.
"Until contacted by AP in August, biotech giant Thermo Fisher Scientific’s website marketed DNA kits to the Chinese police as “designed” for the Chinese population, including “ethnic minorities like Uyghurs and Tibetans.”"
Bullshit. Charlie Kirk organized a 850 chapter, 300,000 man opposition machine & regularly broadcast to 7 million+ followers. The Biden government allowed him to do this. The Trump government allows the same to its opposition. The two regimes are not comparable.
If Charlie Kirk was Chinese he would have been "invited for tea" back in 2013. He would never have been banned from Weibo with the other Big Vs in 2014. If he persisted in organized action he would have disappeared or placed under house arrest the minute he announced a campus
campus tour, a tour whose promotion and existence would be scrubbed from the web. He would not have been allowed to say one thousandth of the critical things he said of Obama, Biden, and the left.
He might be alive--but only because he would have been a powerless nobody.
There are several reasons why Charlie Kirk’s assassination will not create the sort of culture change dynamic as the George Floyd death in 2020.
Attempting to do so will likely be self defeating.
In politics the question is never “what is the right thing to do?” or “does this make me feel like I am doing justice.” Thr question is always “what can actually be accomplished and what will be the likely cost and consequences of accomplishing it?”
I don’t mean that in the squishy sense of norms or “don’t create tools the enemy will use against us” sense, though sometimes those are useful questions to think through.
Before his murder, Charlie Kirk was two things: a power broker in the Trump coalition and a symbol of a specific vision for that coalition.
You will not understand why his murder feels so cataclysmic to so many if you do not first understand what Kirk symbolized.
I have been thinking about Kirk and his appeal for several weeks now, actually. A producer from his show invited me to come on and talk to Kirk about China and Taiwan.
After I accepted this offer I began to binge his past shows, trying to prepare for the episode.
I also talked with several fans, asking them what shows they thought were best and what they liked most about Charlie Kirk.
This episode will obviously never happen now. But I can share with you what I learned about what Kirk means to the right--especially the young right.
I have no patience for this. I especially have no patience for the legions of anons who have accomplished nothing with their life claiming that Kirk accomplished nothing with his.
Kirk showed us a path that works: building institutions with active mass membership, breaking bread and talking constantly with normal Americans, having courage to stand up for our ideas no matter how hostile the environment, and grounding politics in actual virtuous living.
Charlie Kirk was murdered for this. But the assassin did not destroy what Kirk accomplished. TurningPoint exists! Tens of thousands of young men are open Republicans because of him! Hundreds of thousands of voters were mobilized! Donald Trump is president!