We just CT scanned 1,000 lithium-ion batteries from 10 brands to see how they compare inside.
The differences we found are enormous, and point to serious safety risks in off-brand batteries that can easily make their way into the supply chain. Here’s what we saw… 🧵
Can you spot the differences between these two batteries? One is a legitimate Samsung cell; the other is a counterfeit. It’s marked with a Samsung-style part number and feels well-made.
@Samsung But inside, these cells are completely different. Our @lumafield X-ray CT scans reveal that the Samsung cell has consistently high quality; its anode layers overhang the cathodes evenly. The counterfeit is a battery fire waiting to happen.
@Samsung @lumafield In batteries, low quality doesn’t just mean poor performance; it means lethal fires.
The low cost/counterfeit cells we scanned had 7x lower quality overall. Worse: 8% of them had a dangerous defect called negative anode overhang! 0% of the name-brand OEM cells had this defect.
@Samsung @lumafield I’ll summarize what we found in the thread below. But if you want to skip ahead and read our full report, you can download it for free here:
@Samsung @lumafield Cylindrical Lithium-ion batteries are made by coating thin foils with anode and cathode materials, then winding these layers with a separator in between like a jelly roll. This winding process must be tightly controlled.
@Samsung @lumafield The stakes are high. Lithium-ion battery fires are deadly, and they’re caused by tiny defects like the ones shown in our scans of low cost/counterfeit batteries.
@Samsung @lumafield The main quality metric we use is anode-cathode overhang (ACO). Uneven ACO creates unpredictable current distribution, leading to lithium plating, dendrite growth, accelerated aging, gas generation, and ultimately shorts or thermal runaway, which can lead to catastrophic fires.
We CT scanned 1,054 batteries with a @lumafield CT scanner: 300 from high-quality OEMs (Samsung, Panasonic, Murata), 424 from counterfeit/low-cost brands we got on Temu and Amazon, and 330 from “rewraps” which are cells of unknown provenance that get relabeled in the grey market. Then we used Lumafield’s Voyager software to automatically measure quality parameters and highlight defects in bulk.
@Samsung @lumafield Among the 1,054 batteries we scanned, 33 exhibited negative anode overhang, a serious manufacturing defect that significantly increases the risk of internal short-circuiting and fires.
@Samsung @lumafield While none of the brand-name batteries we scanned had negative anode overhang, this dangerous defect was present in nearly 8% of the low-cost or counterfeit batteries we sourced on Temu and Amazon–and 15% in one brand! (I’ll say more about “Maxiaeon” later.)
@Samsung @lumafield Cells like these are everywhere, and it’s easy for consumers to buy them. (Some of their most avid users are people who modify their own vaping equipment. DO NOT put these in your face and try to draw 20 amps!)
@Samsung @lumafield @Reddit They can also make their way into the electronics supply chain. 18650 cells are ubiquitous–consumer electronics, medical devices, even some EVs. And consider that while a single bad cell is dangerous, many products have multiple cells. This e-bike battery pack we scanned has 39!
@Samsung @lumafield @Reddit The battery market is enormous and it operates under high cost pressure. And things are getting worse: add on the supply chain chaos caused by the current tariff war and you get an environment that incentivizes grey-market activity and misleading product labeling.
@Samsung @lumafield @Reddit For manufacturers, defective batteries can mean recalls, years of lawsuits, and loss of trust. Imagine seeing your product on the homepage of every airline like this.
@Samsung @lumafield @Reddit @Delta We’ve detailed all of our findings in our new Battery Quality Report, which you can download for free right here:
You can't just take an online distributor's word for the quality of batteries; you need to look inside them yourself!lumafield.com/battery-report
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last month @AnkerOfficial recalled over one million power banks due to an unspecified battery manufacturing issue. We CT scanned 3 recalled power banks and 2 that weren’t recalled to see what’s going on inside. Here’s what we found…
Lithium-ion batteries must be manufactured to extremely tight tolerances. They’re made by winding thin films of positive electrode (cathode), negative electrode (anode), and separator into a tightly packed “jelly roll” that's sealed into a cylindrical can or rectangular pouch.
If a contaminant is introduced during manufacturing or the film is wound unevenly, it can cause a short circuit between the layers. This can lead to rapid discharge, overheating, and potentially fire—making even small defects a serious safety risk.
Do water filters actually do anything? We CT scanned several popular water filters before and after use to see what they’re able to keep out of your body. Here’s what we found… 🧵
These are before-and-after @lumafield scans of a Brita water filter; it’s filled with a blend of activated carbon and ion-exchange resin and claims to trap chlorine, sediment, and heavy metals like lead. The filter medium swells with use, and it also gets denser. How do we know?
Industrial CT scans capture both geometry and relative density. We start by taking hundreds of X-ray images from different angles, then reconstruct them into a 3D model that can be sectioned and analyzed. A dark area in a 2D X-ray image could be either thicker material or denser material; by rotating the object we’re scanning, we can separate geometry from density. In this @lumafield CT scan, density is visualized as a blue-red color map.
This looks like an ordinary USB-C connector, but when we CT scan it, we find something sinister inside…🧵
Last year we CT scanned a top-of-the-line Thunderbolt 4 connector and were astonished to find a 10-layer PCB with lots of active electronics. A lot of people saw the scan and wondered whether malicious electronics could be hidden in a tiny USB connector.
The answer is yes. This is an cable created by @_MG_, a security researcher and malicious hardware expert. It looks like an ordinary USB cable, but it can log keystrokes, inject malicious code, and communicate with an attacker via WiFi. Let’s see inside… O.MG
We just announced a major breakthrough in X-ray CT technology at @lumafield: scans that take hours with conventional CT will now take seconds. Here's why that's important 🧵
A CT scan is the richest possible source of industrial inspection data: it gives you a full 3D model of your part, inside and out, along with relative density information. But it's always been too slow for use in high-volume production environments—until now.
By bringing scan times down to as little as 0.1 seconds, we've overcome the major drawback of CT. Now it's a practical inspection technology for high-volume production.
Pens are made by the billion, require insane precision, and still work almost every time. We CT scanned a few common pen types to see what’s inside... 🧵
First up: a fountain pen 🖊️ These date back to the 10th century, but practical designs appeared in the 19th century. When the pen is tilted, gravity pulls ink from a cartridge to the nib. Capillary action pulls the ink through a slit in the nib, where it flows onto the page. Here are the 2D X-ray radiographs we captured of a fountain pen; we use software to reconstruct them into a 3D model (next tweet).
Here’s the 3D reconstruction of a retractable fountain pen—the Mahjohn A1. Our CT scan of the pen tip shows a spring loaded door that opens and closes to prevent the ink from drying out and to protect the nib.
We CT scanned an Apple Vision Pro! We also scanned two Meta headsets. Here’s what we found inside, and what it says about the two companies’ approach to AR/VR and to hardware development in general. 🧵
Here are our industrial CT scans of the Meta Quest Pro and Meta Quest 3 headsets. If you want to explore these scans, head to . Now let’s see what we found… lumafield.com/article/apple-…
Apple and Meta have taken different approaches to the market: the Vision Pro is a premium technology showcase for early adopters, while the Meta headsets are priced for accessibility in order to get as many people into the metaverse as possible.