Is it really that far-fetched to imagine Polymarket taking a meaningful stake in Polygon / $POL
On the surface, it might sound ambitious, but if you look closely at both ecosystems, it starts to make a surprising amount of sense.
Polymarket has become crypto’s breakout product the “golden child” of this cycle. Yet people forget- It’s built entirely on Polygon…
Yes they could build their own chain, but Polymarket’s focus is on winning the prediction market space, not on spending years building and maintaining its own chain.
Competing with other prediction markets is already a massive lift and diverting focus to L1/L2 development would be strategically inefficient.
This is, of course, speculative. But it’s surprising how little this kind of strategic alignment is discussed in crypto compared to traditional industries.
Why isn’t a stake, validator role, or buy-in even on the table? At the very least, it’s a conversation worth having and perhaps, a strategic lever hiding in plain sight.
This isn’t about “Polymarket saving Polygon” or vice versa it’s about mutual reinforcement.
One side provides the rails, the other the breakout application that drives real users and volume. That combination, if structured intelligently, could create a far stronger alignment than the current status quo.
On the surface, it might sound ambitious, but if you look closely at both ecosystems, it starts to make a surprising amount of sense.
Polymarket has become crypto’s breakout product the “golden child” of this cycle. Yet people forget- It’s built entirely on Polygon…
Yes they could build their own chain, but Polymarket’s focus is on winning the prediction market space, not on spending years building and maintaining its own chain.
Competing with other prediction markets is already a massive lift and diverting focus to L1/L2 development would be strategically inefficient.
This is, of course, speculative. But it’s surprising how little this kind of strategic alignment is discussed in crypto compared to traditional industries.
Why isn’t a stake, validator role, or buy-in even on the table? At the very least, it’s a conversation worth having and perhaps, a strategic lever hiding in plain sight.
This isn’t about “Polymarket saving Polygon” or vice versa it’s about mutual reinforcement.
One side provides the rails, the other the breakout application that drives real users and volume. That combination, if structured intelligently, could create a far stronger alignment than the current status quo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
