"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT."
ASK THE REST HOW THEY VOTED, WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE AGAIN, & HOW THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE: Ceyshe Napa (President), Signa Oliver, Aaron Marquez, Francisco Pastor-Rivera, Debbie Cross & Lizette Mier
THE MORE MAINSTREAM MEDIA COVERS THE ONGOING CORRELATION—& POTENTIAL CAUSATION—BETWEEN SCHOOL VIOLENCE & THE ABSENCE OF SROs, THE MORE THE POTENTIAL FOR COPYCAT KIDS TO ACT OUT WITH RECKLESS ABANDON
THEY ARE NOT GOING TO STOP THEMSELVES. YOU MUST STOP THEM. SROs MUST STOP THEM.
@ThreadReaderApp: Unroll, please. Thank you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"1) THE SCHOOL REQUESTED AN SRO (COST COVERED BY STATE GOVT), 2) THE TEACHERS REQUESTED AN SRO, 3) THE PARENTS REQUESTED AN SRO, & 4) THE ADMIN CHOSEN BY THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTED AN SRO—BUT A SICKENING MAJORITY OF THE SCHOOL BOARD REJECTED IT"
"The Court ENJOINS the Government from the following actions against Plaintiffs: Interpreting or enforcing 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(1) to prohibit Plaintiffs' (& their members) possession & carrying of firearms inside of an ordinary U.S. Post Office or surrounding Post Office property."
"Second Amendement Foundation @SAF joined in case—FPC v Bondi—by Firearms Policy Coalition @GunPolicy & two private citizens (TX)."
1st Up: Plaintiffs w/ Standing + Org Membership | Next Up: Expansion to #WeThePeople throughout the United States. Thanks!
2) In a 6-1 "decision," the U.S. Supreme Court #SCOTUS ruled the following school prayer unconstitutional:
"Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen."
3) Lower courts upheld the prayer so long as students were never forced to participate or compelled to recite the prayer over parental objections. In SCOTUS Justice Potter Stewart's dissent, he wrote:
VOTECHEAT GOES OFF THE DEEP END: Runs Fraudulent Ranked Choice Voting Election w/ Staff Pet Candidates
—AZ TX WI MI PA Propaganda—
ELECTION FRAUD ALERT: Why's Natalia Contreras, Hayley Harding, & Carter Walker each running more than only 1 candidate in the same election? #FAIL
SELF-OWN: 6 Votecheat Staff Pet Owners Field 9 Candidates in Same Election
Natalia Contreras TX
Alexander Shur WI
Hayley Harding MI
Carter Walker PA
Elaine Cromie Civic News photo editor
Jessica Huseman editorial director
MIA: Jen Fifield AZ
2/X Already-politicized so-called "non-partisan" League of Women Voters @LWV wastes no time politicizing USCIS' announcement:
Celina Stewart, #LWV CEO, says the new policy "is an attempt to keep new citizens from accessing their full rights."
3/X #USCIS proactively counters: "This change in no way impacts new citizens' access to information & applications to Register to Vote, as this information will continue to be provided by state or local election officials, or USCIS staff at the end of Naturalization Ceremonies."
The MCRC may provide equal opportunity resources to interested & qualifying Republican Primary candidates.
If you're interested in something similar, please feel free to contact the MCRC via its website contact form.
Thank you!
2 MCRC e-blasts—Biggs 8/27/25 & Taylor Robson 9/1/25— are for informational purposes only, & do not represent MCRC (or EGC) endorsements.
As always, if you'd like to join a campaign, that's your call.
Related: As per MCRC Bylaws Article VI Section 5A on Elections Neutrality...
EGC: "Contested Primary Elections: No officer or member may claim to speak on behalf of the EGC in support of a candidate in Republican Primary Elections unless authorized to do so by the advance approval of 60% of the elected membership of the EGC at a duly constituted meeting."