All converted automatically.
All reproduced results exactly.
Zero human setup.
And this is where it gets interesting.
The AlphaGenome agent disagreed with the original authors.
When asked to re-analyze a variant linked to cholesterol, it picked a different causal gene (SORT1) and defended it with plots, quantile scores, and biological reasoning.
An AI agent just reinterpreted a Nature paper.
Think about what that means.
Every paper becomes a living system.
You don’t just read it - you talk to it.
You test it, challenge it, extend it.
And if your paper can’t be turned into an agent?
Maybe it wasn’t reproducible to begin with.
PDFs are static.
Agents are alive.
Paper2Agent hints at a future where discoveries are interactive.
Where AlphaFold could talk to Scanpy.
Where methods become APIs.
Honestly, this might be what “AI co-scientists” actually looks like.
Stop guessing what your customers want.
TestFeed gives you AI personas of your target customers + expert consultants that:
- See your screen while you work
- Give contextual feedback in real-time
- Think like the actual people you're building for
They figured out how to train AI agents without rewards, human demos, or supervision and it actually works better than both.
It’s called 'Early Experience', and it quietly kills the two biggest pain points in agent training:
→ Human demonstrations that don’t scale
→ Reinforcement learning that’s expensive and unstable
Instead of copying experts or chasing reward signals, agents now:
- Take their own actions
- Observe what happens
- Learn directly from consequences — *no external rewards needed*
The numbers are wild:
✅ +18.4% on web navigation (WebShop)
✅ +15.0% on complex planning (TravelPlanner)
✅ +13.3% on scientific reasoning (ScienceWorld)
✅ Works across **8 environments**
And when you add RL afterward?
🔥 +6.4% better than traditional pipelines.
Two key ideas make it work:
1. Implicit World Modeling - agents predict what happens next, forming an internal world model.
2. Self-Reflection - they compare mistakes to experts and explain why the expert choice was better.
Both scale. Both are reward-free.
Efficiency is absurd:
1/8 of expert data
86.9% lower cost
Works from 3B → 70B models
This isn’t incremental.
It’s the bridge between imitation learning and true autonomous experience.
AI agents can now teach themselves - no human hand-holding required.
The problem with current AI agents is brutal.
Imitation Learning: Agents only see expert demos.
When they mess up, they can't recover because they never learned what happens when you take wrong actions.
RL: Needs verifiable rewards. Most real-world environments don't have them.Early Experience solves both.
Here's how Self-Reflection actually works:
1/ Agent sees an expert action at each state 2/ Agent proposes 3 alternative actions 3/ Environment shows what happens with each 4/ LLM generates reasoning: "Why was the expert choice better?" 5/ Agent trains on this reasoning
Every AI agent demo you've seen is basically fraud.
Google just dropped their internal agent playbook and exposed how broken the entire space is.
That "autonomous AI employee" your startup demoed last week? It's three ChatGPT calls wrapped in marketing copy. Google's real agents need four evaluation layers, full DevOps infrastructure, and security protocols most teams have never heard of.
While founders pitch "agents that think," Google ships AgentOps with Terraform configs and CI/CD pipelines. They're building distributed systems. Everyone else is building expensive chatbots.
The gap is insane. Startups demo function calls. Google deploys sequential workflows, parallel processing, and loop agents with ACID compliance.
Most brutal part: the security requirements. These agents access internal APIs and databases. One prompt injection and your company data is gone. Most builders treat this like an afterthought.
Google's playing chess while everyone else plays checkers. Let startups burn VC money on agent toys, then dominate when they need actual production infrastructure.
The agent revolution isn't happening until people stop confusing demos with systems.
The guide reveals Google's three-path strategy for agent development.
Most teams are randomly picking tools without understanding these architectural choices.
Here's what nobody talks about: agent evaluation isn't just "does it work?" Google breaks it into 4 layers that expose how shallow most current agents really are.