15 years in the making, we confirmed that mitochondria -the powerhouse of the cell- have an unusual localization in patients who experience psychosis (including schizophrenia and bipolar disorders). You’ll never guess what kind of patient cells we used to make this discovery...🧵
… unless you’ve heard me talk about it, which I’ve done a lot over the past decade :D
Including in this Quanta video:
The answer is skin cells. Skin cells! That seems really odd, but lots of cells share lots of components and processes that are used in different ways in different cell types. And not-fun fact: psychotic symptoms are associated with skin abnormalities.
This mislocalization, in which mitochondria cluster too close to the nucleus in the middle of cells, may deprive cells, including brain cells, of energy and metabolites needed for growth, function, and repair.
We then queried cell image databases to find chemicals and genetic perturbations that change mitochondrial localization in either direction, towards or away from the nucleus. Many have known involvement in mental function!
This means that we can screen for potential novel drugs for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in easily-grown skin cells, using mitochondria as a simple readout. In fact, a team at NIH’s NCATS is working on this now! Stay tuned.
Congrats to the project team across McLean Hospital & Broad Institute! First authors: Marzieh Haghighi & Donna McPhie! Co-senior author Bruce Cohen. Team: Mohammad Rohban, Erin Weisbart, David Logan, Kyle Karhohs, Jessica Ewald, Johan Fredin Haslum, Beth Cimini, Shantanu Singh.
Thanks to the funders who believed in us, enabling us to complete this work in pieces over time: NIH NIGMS, Merkin Institute, BroadIgnite, BBRF, Harvard-MIT Neurodiscovery program, and the Program for Neuropsychiatric Research at McLean Hospital.
Last week I was invited to sign a letter offering support for David Sabatini, organized by current & former lab members. Universities considering hiring him have asked for this.
I will not sign.
There was no option to provide a more nuanced response, so I will elaborate here 🧵
First, I want to be clear that those organizing are people I feel fondly towards, due to our shared experiences together growing as scientists. No one pressured me to sign and I appreciate that.
That said, I was not surprised to see the investigation (which did not involve me) found “issues of particular concern” relating to lab climate. The lab environment was unprofessional when I joined in 2003. I trust those who report that it worsened since then.
8 w Covid in our house. We are all fine now (yay science! Thanks vaccines!!), but wanted to share our testing results in case it helps decision making. 🧵
TL;DR: antigen and PCR tests were both unreliable making it very difficult to know whom to quarantine from whom.
First problem: we had mostly neg at-home/antigen tests even when symptomatic. The only + tests were those w worst symptoms (unboosted), plus one throat swab (don’t eat/drink 30 minutes before!) In one case, person was neg, then + a day later despite big symptoms both days.
(we only saw each other; what are the chances some of us got some random non Covid illness simultaneously w same symptoms? Together with the neg person switching positive, to me this says the tests are missing a lot and thus really not useful for confirming you DON’T have Covid).
We tested this idea using images (cell morphology) to see whether a query gene’s morphological “profile” could be used to query a database of compounds. The microscopy assay we use is Cell Painting, where a bunch of organelles are labeled.
Before we begin: computational biology has made major contributions and the culture is healthier than ever. Still, those attempting to bridge the interdisciplinary gap often languish in career advancement, publication, and grant review. So we focus on solutions here!
(NB: we use “computationalist” broadly to include stats, math, computer/data science, etc)
I only applied for this major grant because an NIH Program Officer went out of his way to encourage me.
How many don't flourish in their careers because someone isn't looking out for them? How can YOU take this role for someone, esp. those less privileged?
I had to stare at it, and have my colleague look at ERA commons, just to be sure it really meant what I thought. Both of us, seasoned scientists, started questioning the scoring system and had to doublecheck 😄.
It's amazing what getting a grant means. Excitement about the science that will be done, enthusiasm for the lab members it will employ, excitement about the impact on the world it will have, ... and a break from writing a zillion proposals over the next few years.
Top tips for those attending a professional conference for the first time!
1. It's ok if you only understand the first few minutes of a talk (when the topic is being introduced). Absorb what you can, then tune in for the next talk. Many times it's the speaker at fault, not you.
2. Conference rooms are notoriously cold: wear some extra layers and maybe a scarf.
3. Always introduce yourself with your first & last name (& affiliation). You are not a disposable, forgettable person whose identity doesn't matter! Sure, 95% of people will forget your name, but using your first name only conveys that they shouldn't even bother trying.