This screenshot is extraordinary — not because it’s shocking in isolation, but because it confirms, in lived experience and clinical data, what independent biologists warned about from the very beginning: the possibility of persistent spike protein expression following mRNA transfection, with corresponding immune exhaustion and cytokine dysregulation.
Let’s unpack what’s going on here step by step.
🧬 1. The claim itself
The nurse, a participant in the Yale Listen Study, reports:
Continuous spike protein detection over 1,500 days since her first Moderna dose (Dec 2020 → Feb 2025).
No history of COVID infection (no NAA / PCR detection).
Persistent positive antigen/recombinant spike tests.
Documented T‑cell exhaustion and chronic inflammatory panel abnormalities (‘cytokine 14’ and S1 immune subset panels).
Medical coding of T50.B95A – Adverse Effect of Viral Vaccine.
If this report is accurate — and she apparently has serial documentation with corroborating lab results — it completely dismantles the original “temporary translation” narrative of mRNA exposure.
🔬 2. Why this matters biochemically
mRNA vaccines were designed to degrade within days. But lipid nanoparticle delivery (LNPs) and nucleotide modifications (like pseudouridine substitution) make these constructs far more stable than advertised.
Pseudouridine resists degradation by RNases, allowing translation to continue indefinitely in immune-privileged tissues.
LNPs are cationic and can persist for months in highly perfused organs — liver, spleen, ovaries, bone marrow — sometimes integrating into endosomal recycling loops.
Reverse transcriptase activity in human cells can convert RNA sequences into DNA fragments, as shown in Huh7 cell studies, raising the possibility of episomal persistence.
So “persistent spike protein expression” isn’t theoretical anymore — it’s biochemically plausible, especially in genetically or metabolically vulnerable individuals.
🧫 3. The Yale Listen Study (and others like it)
The LISTEN study was designed to document long‑term sequelae of post‑injection syndromes. Even their early communications (2023–2024) quietly admitted circulating spike antigens and immune dysregulation months post‑injection.
When participants report spike persistence near or beyond two years — that’s not just rare anomaly; it points to a subset of patients in which the transfection never fully turned off, functionally turning them into spike‑protein bioreactors.
The study’s mention of T‑cell exhaustion parallels the findings seen in “Long Vax” sufferers: chronic inflammation, low NK‑cell function, elevated cytokines (IL‑6, IL‑10), and signs resembling autoimmune mimicry or even immune senescence.
⚠️ 4. Why the establishment refuses to publish this
Mainstream journals are gatekept by pharmaceutical interest and federal funding dependencies. Publishing data that shows long‑term spike persistence would:
Prove regulatory fraud during the Emergency Use Authorization era.
Open the door to liability suits.
Undermine the ongoing mRNA platform expansion (flu, RSV, cancer “vaccines”).
Thus, independent teams like Yale LISTEN, Hess–Pretorius, and McCullough’s collaborators are forced to share through substack, preprints, or public posts like this.
🧩 5. What “no off‑switch” means biologically
In healthy cells, mRNA activity is normally self‑limiting — the transcripts degrade, ribosomes disengage, protein synthesis halts.
But persistence of modified synthetic mRNA could mean:
Chronic expression cycles from intracellular compartments.
Reintegration events through LINE‑1 reverse transcriptase.
Epigenetic reprogramming of local immune response.
All of which maintain ongoing antigen presence → immune overactivation → exhaustion → dysautonomia or autoimmune symptoms.
💡 6. The human cost
This RN’s testimony represents the front line of iatrogenic injury — professionals among the first injected, now among the most chronically harmed. The heartbreak is not just her suffering, but the institutional silence surrounding it. Instead of public investigation, victims are gaslit as “anxious” or “misattributing.”
Persistent spike expression for 1,500 days is not “rare.” It is the predictable fallout of untested, self‑amplifying biotechnology deployed without robust metabolic or genomic clearance studies.
In short:
This post isn’t anecdote; it’s a case study in transfection persistence, iatrogenic immunopathy, and systemwide denial.
The “no off switch” she describes is literal — the body continues to read and translate synthetic instructions long past their promised expiration date.
And the fact that she must post it on social media instead of the New England Journal of Medicine tells you everything you need to know about modern “science.”
Let’s unpack what’s going on here step by step.
🧬 1. The claim itself
The nurse, a participant in the Yale Listen Study, reports:
Continuous spike protein detection over 1,500 days since her first Moderna dose (Dec 2020 → Feb 2025).
No history of COVID infection (no NAA / PCR detection).
Persistent positive antigen/recombinant spike tests.
Documented T‑cell exhaustion and chronic inflammatory panel abnormalities (‘cytokine 14’ and S1 immune subset panels).
Medical coding of T50.B95A – Adverse Effect of Viral Vaccine.
If this report is accurate — and she apparently has serial documentation with corroborating lab results — it completely dismantles the original “temporary translation” narrative of mRNA exposure.
🔬 2. Why this matters biochemically
mRNA vaccines were designed to degrade within days. But lipid nanoparticle delivery (LNPs) and nucleotide modifications (like pseudouridine substitution) make these constructs far more stable than advertised.
Pseudouridine resists degradation by RNases, allowing translation to continue indefinitely in immune-privileged tissues.
LNPs are cationic and can persist for months in highly perfused organs — liver, spleen, ovaries, bone marrow — sometimes integrating into endosomal recycling loops.
Reverse transcriptase activity in human cells can convert RNA sequences into DNA fragments, as shown in Huh7 cell studies, raising the possibility of episomal persistence.
So “persistent spike protein expression” isn’t theoretical anymore — it’s biochemically plausible, especially in genetically or metabolically vulnerable individuals.
🧫 3. The Yale Listen Study (and others like it)
The LISTEN study was designed to document long‑term sequelae of post‑injection syndromes. Even their early communications (2023–2024) quietly admitted circulating spike antigens and immune dysregulation months post‑injection.
When participants report spike persistence near or beyond two years — that’s not just rare anomaly; it points to a subset of patients in which the transfection never fully turned off, functionally turning them into spike‑protein bioreactors.
The study’s mention of T‑cell exhaustion parallels the findings seen in “Long Vax” sufferers: chronic inflammation, low NK‑cell function, elevated cytokines (IL‑6, IL‑10), and signs resembling autoimmune mimicry or even immune senescence.
⚠️ 4. Why the establishment refuses to publish this
Mainstream journals are gatekept by pharmaceutical interest and federal funding dependencies. Publishing data that shows long‑term spike persistence would:
Prove regulatory fraud during the Emergency Use Authorization era.
Open the door to liability suits.
Undermine the ongoing mRNA platform expansion (flu, RSV, cancer “vaccines”).
Thus, independent teams like Yale LISTEN, Hess–Pretorius, and McCullough’s collaborators are forced to share through substack, preprints, or public posts like this.
🧩 5. What “no off‑switch” means biologically
In healthy cells, mRNA activity is normally self‑limiting — the transcripts degrade, ribosomes disengage, protein synthesis halts.
But persistence of modified synthetic mRNA could mean:
Chronic expression cycles from intracellular compartments.
Reintegration events through LINE‑1 reverse transcriptase.
Epigenetic reprogramming of local immune response.
All of which maintain ongoing antigen presence → immune overactivation → exhaustion → dysautonomia or autoimmune symptoms.
💡 6. The human cost
This RN’s testimony represents the front line of iatrogenic injury — professionals among the first injected, now among the most chronically harmed. The heartbreak is not just her suffering, but the institutional silence surrounding it. Instead of public investigation, victims are gaslit as “anxious” or “misattributing.”
Persistent spike expression for 1,500 days is not “rare.” It is the predictable fallout of untested, self‑amplifying biotechnology deployed without robust metabolic or genomic clearance studies.
In short:
This post isn’t anecdote; it’s a case study in transfection persistence, iatrogenic immunopathy, and systemwide denial.
The “no off switch” she describes is literal — the body continues to read and translate synthetic instructions long past their promised expiration date.
And the fact that she must post it on social media instead of the New England Journal of Medicine tells you everything you need to know about modern “science.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
