brief. Profile picture
Oct 14 18 tweets 4 min read Read on X
China’s Stranglehold on Pakistan’s Rare Earth Ambitions

1/18 China has executed a masterclass in economic leverage. Following Pakistan’s September 8th memorandum of understanding with US Strategic Metals, a $500 million arrangement to develop critical minerals in Balochistan, Beijing implemented sweeping export controls specifically targeting overseas rare earth producers utilizing Chinese extraction technologies and equipment.
2/18 The timing proved interesting, days after Pakistan shipped its initial rare earth consignment to the United States, China’s Commerce Ministry unveiled regulations requiring foreign entities to obtain Chinese government licenses before exporting products derived from Chinese mining, processing, or separation equipment.
3/18 Pakistan faces a major technical barrier. The country’s rare earth processing infrastructure, installed through the $60 billion China Pakistan Economic Corridor, relies entirely on Chinese supplied refineries and extraction systems. The separation technologies represent the genuine value proposition, as 90 percent of the world’s 250 rare earth minerals exist in mixed form.
4/18 Beijing’s new framework mirrors America’s Foreign Direct Product Rule, mandating Chinese approval for any exports containing trace amounts (defined as 0.1 percent or greater) of Chinese origin rare earth materials, or manufactured using Chinese technologies across mining, processing, or magnet production.
5/18 Chinese industry analysts characterize rare earth extraction and purification as analogous to picking black beans from a bowl of sesame, a process requiring specialized expertise Pakistan cannot replicate domestically. Even substantial American capital investment cannot compensate for the absence of Chinese processing capabilities necessary to achieve military grade specifications.
6/18 China’s dominance across the supply chain remains absolute that is 70 percent of global rare earth mining, 90 percent of separation and processing operations, and 93 percent of permanent magnet manufacturing. This vertical integration transformed what appeared to be Pakistan’s sovereign mineral wealth into assets effectively controlled by Beijing.
7/18 The CPEC framework, celebrated as transformative infrastructure development, established comprehensive dependencies. Chinese metallurgical corporations operate Pakistan’s Saindak Copper Gold Mine and maintain substantial involvement in the Reko Diq project, two cornerstone assets in Balochistan’s mineral sector. Every extraction tool, every processing facility, every separation technology bears Chinese provenance.
8/18 Pakistan’s estimated five million metric tons of rare earth reserves, valued at several trillion dollars, have become a focal point in Sino American strategic competition. Chinese commentators note these minerals could sustain American defense contractors’ production of F 35 fighter jets and nuclear submarines. Yet Islamabad cannot monetize these resources without Beijing’s concurrence.
9/18 The geopolitical calculations have shifted dramatically. Chinese media, which traditionally characterized Pakistan as China’s iron brother, now publish pointed reminders that Pakistan must remember who its true brother is and exercise caution regarding actions that might compromise China’s core strategic interests.
10/18 Pakistan’s predicament extends beyond diplomatic discomfort. The nation possesses substantial mineral deposits yet lacks the autonomous capability to refine them to internationally tradable standards. Chinese equipment suppliers like Zhengzhou Tiei Extraction Technology and Baotou Shibo Rare Earth Extraction and Equipment represent the technological gatekeepers to Pakistan’s mineral sector.
11/18 The security environment further complicates these challenges. Balochistan, home to Pakistan’s most significant mineral wealth, experiences persistent insurgent activity. The Balochistan Liberation Army characterizes CPEC projects as exploitative ventures draining regional resources without benefiting local populations. Mining operations proceed under constant threat.
12/18 The American alternative remains aspirational rather than operational. The Department of Defense invested $400 million in MP Materials during July 2025, establishing the government as the company’s largest shareholder. However, MP Materials projects production of merely 1,000 tons of neodymium iron boron magnets by year’s end, less than one percent of China’s 138,000 ton annual output.
13/18 Washington established a mine to magnet supply chain completion target of 2027, yet even optimistic projections acknowledge years of continued vulnerability to Chinese supply decisions. The United States committed over $439 million since 2020 toward domestic capabilities, but temporal realities favor Beijing’s established infrastructure.
14/18 Pakistan’s strategic miscalculation where it attempted to leverage its mineral endowment as a negotiating asset between competing superpowers, failing to recognize that Chinese infrastructure investments had already subordinated those resources to Beijing’s regulatory authority. The minerals exist within Pakistani territory, yet their commercial viability depends entirely on Chinese authorization.
15/18 This episode highlights Belt and Road’s strategic architecture. China’s Commerce Ministry characterization of these measures as efforts to better safeguard world peace and regional stability masks their function as economic coercion instruments. Beijing constructed dependencies through infrastructure provision, then activated those dependencies when partners’ actions diverged from Chinese preferences.
16/18 The implications extend beyond rare earths into comprehensive industrial dependency. When processing infrastructure, extraction equipment, and separation technologies all originate from a single source, recipient nations discover their sovereignty over natural resources proves theoretical rather than practical. Pakistan can mine its rare earths indefinitely. It simply cannot refine or export them without Chinese consent.
17/18 China invested fifteen years and over $60 billion establishing this leverage architecture. The recent export controls merely formalized constraints that existed structurally since CPEC’s inception. Pakistan now confronts the reality that its proclaimed strategic partnership with China operates under profoundly asymmetric terms, where Beijing retains unilateral authority to determine whether Pakistani minerals reach international markets.
18/18 China demonstrated that modern resource control requires neither military occupation nor explicit sanctions. Patient infrastructure investment coupled with technological monopolies suffices. Pakistan’s rare earth ambitions, regardless of geological endowment or American commercial interest, remain subordinate to Chinese regulatory prerogative.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with brief.

brief. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brief_pk

Sep 30
The Corporate Colonization of Pakistan’s Farmland

1/9 THE INVISIBLE MACHINE
November 2024. Thousands of Pakistani farmers gathered in Lahore with a declaration the world chose to ignore: they would not surrender their fields. What these farmers understood and what remains invisible to most observers is that they face a coordinated apparatus involving the IMF, World Bank, WTO, multinational agribusiness, Gulf monarchies, Chinese state enterprises, Pakistan’s own military establishment, and domestic political dynasties.

This is not one nation’s administrative failure. It is a methodical transfer of wealth from the Global South to corporate entities, operating openly yet obscured by technical language and development discourse. Farmers recognize what policy analysts miss: the systematic elimination of protections enabling independent agriculture, and the transfer of land from those who cultivate it to those who extract profit from it. The pattern visible in Pakistan repeats across continents. Understanding the mechanism here illuminates its operation elsewhere. Nine posts follow, mapping the architecture of dispossession.
2/9 CONCENTRATED POWER

Four corporations command 66.5% of the global seed market: Bayer, Corteva, ChemChina, Limagrain. A decade ago, these firms held 47%. Seeds, pesticides, equipment, pharmaceuticals each sector now exhibits oligopoly characteristics, with four firms controlling over 40% of market share. The structure extends deeper. These agribusiness entities are substantially owned by investment firms: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity. A concentrated group of financial institutions thus influences the corporations controlling the seeds that determine what farmers plant and what populations consume.

Against this backdrop, 690 million people experience hunger while two billion lack consistent access to adequate nutrition. Simultaneously, Cargill and Unilever report record earnings. This is not malfunction but design a system optimized for value extraction rather than food provision. The machinery now operates in Pakistan with precision.
3/9 ENGINEERED DEPENDENCY

Pakistan has sought IMF assistance 24 times since 1958. External debt reached $130 billion by 2024. Each intervention increases debt burden while imposing conditions that weaken agricultural protections. Consider Kenya, where 60% of government revenue services debt obligations, half the national budget committed to foreign creditors rather than public goods.

This creates the context for “structural adjustment.” The IMF’s 2024 agreement requires Pakistan to eliminate agricultural support prices, remove farmer subsidies, and phase out what the agreement terms “incentives for low-productivity agriculture.” February 2025: Pakistan withdrew wheat price supports. The Agriculture Development Bank offering accessible credit was privatized. Food subsidy programs operating since 1972 were dismantled.
Each support mechanism removed systematically, creating conditions where only large-scale corporate operations remain viable. When most of your budget services foreign debt, policy is dictated by creditors. The debt trap is not accident it is the mechanism enabling external control.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 25
1/11 Why Your Electricity Bill Will Never Come Down: Pakistan's Rs 2 Trillion Scam

On September 25, 2025, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb signed what he called the "largest financing deal in Pakistan's history." While government officials and bank executives celebrated at the Prime Minister's House, every Pakistani family was quietly handed a bill for the next six years. The government signed a Rs 1.225 trillion loan agreement with 18 banks to address Pakistan's circular debt, which has grown to Rs 2.4 trillion, equivalent to 2.1% of the entire GDP.
2/11 What Actually Happened

Pakistan's circular debt has reached nearly Rs 2.4 trillion and has strained the energy supply chain while weakening investor confidence. The government owes this money to electricity companies for power already consumed but never paid for. Instead of finding ways to recover money from companies that overcharged or addressing the root causes, the government signed a deal to borrow Rs 1.225 trillion from banks, with repayments coming through the existing Rs 3.23 per unit debt service surcharge that consumers already pay.
The total cost to electricity consumers will be Rs 1.938 trillion over six years - the Rs 1.275 trillion loan plus Rs 663 billion in interest payments. This amounts to Rs 323 billion per year that will be collected directly from citizens through their electricity bills.
3/11 How This Affects Your Daily Life

For the average Pakistani household consuming 300-400 units monthly, the Rs 3.23 per unit surcharge adds approximately Rs 1,000-1,300 to each monthly electricity bill. Over six years, this represents roughly Rs 75,000-100,000 per household - money taken directly from family budgets for groceries, children's education, medical expenses, and savings.

- If you're a shopkeeper earning Rs 40,000 monthly: This surcharge consumes Rs 1,200 from your income monthly - equivalent to losing four days of earnings. You'll need to raise prices on customers or work longer hours to maintain your living standard.

- If you're a teacher earning Rs 30,000 monthly: The extra Rs 1,200 forces difficult choices between your child's school fees and proper meals. Many families will move children from private to government schools or delay medical treatments.

- If you're a factory worker earning Rs 25,000 monthly: This surcharge takes nearly 5% of your entire income. Your family might need to move to cheaper housing or eliminate meat from meals several days weekly.

- If you run a small business: Your electricity costs increase substantially while competitors in India, Bangladesh, and China face no such burden. You'll either shut down or reduce your workforce to survive.
Read 11 tweets
Sep 13
1/15 A Commonwealth Observer Group report on Pakistan’s February 2024 elections was buried for over a year after the military government requested its suppression. This marks the first such suppression in the organization’s 70-year history. The leaked document exposes systematic electoral fraud that reversed the clear verdict of Pakistani voters.
2/15 The Commonwealth deployed 13 international observers to Pakistan, led by former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan. Their confidential report, leaked to Drop Site News, accuses the government of violating “fundamental political rights, including freedom of association, assembly and expression.”
3/15 The report documents “discrepancies between polling station results forms and tabulated results forms” that “may have resulted in some candidates being unlawfully returned.” In plain terms: vote counts were altered to install preferred candidates.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 11
1/15 State Bank of Pakistan just issued its mid-year review claiming floods "may pose fresh challenges" to economic recovery. This language shows institutional blindness to what's happening across Pakistan's agricultural heartland.
2/15 SBP says agriculture has a "relatively contained share" in loan portfolios so banking sector soundness remains "immune" to flood damage. Tell that to the 4 million people affected nationwide, where over 1 million acres of cropland is underwater in Punjab alone.
3/15 The central bank's stress tests model "hypothetical shocks" while real climate disasters destroy the productive base that generates loan repayments. 883 people dead as of September 10, 4.225 million impacted. This isn't hypothetical.
Read 15 tweets
Sep 9
Pakistan’s Surveillance State Details

1/12 New investigation reveals Pakistan operates one of the world’s most comprehensive surveillance systems outside China, monitoring millions of citizens using imported technology from Germany, France, UAE, China, Canada, and the US.

The system consists of two interconnected surveillance networks that work in tandem: LIMS monitors 4+ million phones simultaneously while WMS 2.0 blocks 2 million internet sessions at once. Both systems allow intelligence agencies to spy on citizens with virtually no oversight or transparency, creating what experts call a “digital panopticon.”
2/12 Pakistan’s surveillance operates through two core systems built with foreign technology:

PHONE TAPPING: Lawful Intercept Management System (LIMS) uses German Utimaco technology deployed through UAE-based Datafusion monitoring centers. ISI officers simply enter a phone number to access real-time calls, text messages, location data, and web browsing history.

INTERNET FIREWALL: Web Monitoring System 2.0 uses Chinese Geedge Networks technology - a commercialized version of China’s Great Firewall. Components include US Niagara Networks hardware and French Thales software with deep packet inspection capabilities that can monitor, throttle, or completely block internet traffic.
3/12 The system evolved through strategic international partnerships:

2018: Pakistan signed $18.5 million contract with Canadian firm Sandvine for original firewall, with Inbox Business Technologies Ltd serving as local partner for “procurement of hardware, software and provision of related services.”

2024: Sandvine sanctioned by US and exits Pakistan market after human rights violations

2023-2025: Chinese Geedge Networks, founded by Great Firewall architect Fang Binxing, replaces Sandvine with advanced system. The company exports surveillance tech to Myanmar, Kazakhstan, Ethiopia, and Pakistan as part of China’s “Digital Silk Road” initiative.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 7
A brief Exclusive

1/6 Imran Khan Orders Purge of “Establishment’s Pawns” from PTI, Starting with AJK Chapter; Qayyum Niazi Under Scrutiny for Alleged Secret Meetings

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan has ordered a major internal purge against party members accused of clandestine dealings with the powerful establishment, sources within the party’s top leadership confirmed on Thursday. The decision, described as a cleansing campaign, comes after a thorough review of what Khan perceives as a coordinated effort to undermine the party from within through covert contacts. The campaign is set to be launched initially from the party’s Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) chapter, with its President, Abdul Qayyum Niazi, squarely in the crosshairs.
2/6 The immediate trigger for the action was a detailed report on the activities of Sardar Abdul Qayyum Niazi. The report allegedly contains evidence of two lengthy, secret meetings between Niazi and Faisal Naseer. The first meeting is said to have taken place at the White House in Muzaffarabad and lasted for three hours. A second, even longer meeting, spanning four hours, reportedly occurred in Islamabad approximately two months ago. Beyond the meetings, Niazi faces serious allegations of financial impropriety. He is accused of collecting substantial funds from overseas Kashmiris under the guise of party donations and for allocating party tickets for the previous AJK elections, but failing to deposit a significant portion into the official party fund. An investigation is underway into the continuous contacts between Niazi’s nephew and the Sector Commander in Muzaffarabad, suggesting a sustained backchannel of communication.
3/6 After reviewing the evidence, Imran Khan has given his approval to begin the cleansing operation from AJK. Key directives issued to party officials include: The immediate removal of Abdul Qayyum Niazi from the presidency of PTI AJK. A complete and transparent audit of the allegations against him. The expulsion of individuals who are found to be acting on the behest of the establishment, termed as pawns. Compiling a list of party members across all tiers who have engaged in secret meetings with establishment figures.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(