Aaron Slodov Profile picture
Oct 14 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
i'm really tired of ragebait on how advanced china's industrial base is.

let's dispel this by diving into NIST's MIC report.

note: do not read this if you're a gullible euro VC or western exec who would back down after a factory visit to china. we still need to act NOW. Image
first, let's be clear what "advanced manufacturing" actually means:

it's not what, but HOW you manufacture. machines, software, process optimization, automated quality control. digitization, etc.

you can make a plastic bottle cap in a high-tech way or a low-tech way.
here's the reality per NIST citing chinese government sources:

only 37% of chinese manufacturers reached BASIC digitization only 4% have leading-edge manufacturing capabilities

they built more factories. they didn't build tons of advanced factories.
china gets this. made in china (MIC) 2025 had one explicit goal: reach ~80% domestic production in key industries by 2025.

they launched 33 "manufacturing innovation centers" (MICs) - R&D hubs for inventing new production methods - backed by $300B+ in funding. Image
new energy vehicles, high-tech ship components, industrial robots, medical devices, mobile phone chips, even wide-body aircraft.

replace every foreign product. Image
but here's the deeper strategy: don't just replace foreign products. replace the foreign manufacturing technology itself.

the plan targeted 50-70% domestic share in high-end CNC machines, robot core components, industrial software, smart manufacturing IT. Image
so what happened after $300B+ and 33 innovation centers over 9 years?

massive "overcapacity" that isn't a bug - it's a weapon.

solar capacity 2-3X global demand. auto factories running at 59%. selling at negative margins.

this isn't failed planning. this is dumping subsidized products to kill foreign competitors and deindustrialize everyone else.
meanwhile, US Manufacturing USA gets $160M annual federal funding for 18 institutes.

germany's fraunhofer gets $374M - investing ~20X more relative to GDP.

we're letting china outspend us on manufacturing process R&D while we still lead in actual innovation. Image
the real story: build so much capacity you can flood global markets.

operate at a loss, state banks cover it. undercut every competitor until their factories close.

then you're the only supplier left.
the "overcapacity" isn't a market failure. it's deliberate economic warfare to ensure no one else can manufacture.

and it's working. look at how much us and eu manufacturing capacity has declined while china's dominates.
so what do we do? build. now.

not in 5 years when committees finish studying it. the window to reindustrialize is closing. every quarter we debate, they add more factories. speed is the only counter to scale.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Slodov

Aaron Slodov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aphysicist

Oct 9
CHINA JUST WEAPONIZED THE ENTIRE RARE EARTH SUPPLY CHAIN

get used to reading chinese MOFCOM bulletins because they're writing american industrial policy now.

announced today: any product containing >0.1% chinese rare earth materials needs beijing's approval before re-export to third countries.

doesn't matter if you manufactured it in taiwan, vietnam, or texas.

chinese dysprosium in your magnet? chinese gallium in your chip? beijing gets veto power over the sale.

this is the nuclear option. US spent 3 years trying to deny china access to advanced chipmaking tools. china just responded with chokehold on literally every semiconductor fab, AI data center, defense contractor, and EV manufacturer on earth.

everything runs on chinese rare earths. building alternative supply chains takes 5-10 years minimum.

we don't have 5-10 years. effective december 1st.

the AI boom just hit a hard ceiling and we're still pretending we can offshore our way to prosperity.

time to reindustrialize like our lives depend on it. because they do.Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
May 31
so the US just figured out how to legally force chinese companies to hand over their tech without actually "forcing" them and nobody's talking about it. this is the story of eagle electronics, an ohio-based 'startup' that raised $14M and took over a $500M book of business
eagle didn't exist until march 2024. they just got quectel who controls 40% of the global cellular module market to voluntarily hand over their manufacturing tech, source code, and send 30 employees to ohio to train workers
why would quectel do this? because biden banned chinese cellular modules in cars starting 2027. quectel faced a choice: lose the massive us auto market or license their tech to a us company. they chose door number 2
Read 6 tweets
Apr 28
just finished reading through the house armed services committee drop. if it survives markup, 2025 could mark the single biggest shot of adrenaline into u.s. manufacturing capacity since ww2. a thread 👇
2/ headline: >$25b in direct spend aimed squarely at building things – new shipyard kit, missile lines, additive factories, depots, and the skilled-labor pipelines to run them.
3/ shipbuilding alone gets a hard reset: additive-wire shops, cold-spray repair, new dry-docks, ai-driven process upgrades, even a maritime “collaborative campus.” $6b+ to drag legacy yards into the 21st century.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 25
manufacturing is hard. at @atomic_inc we're building the AWS of mass production. vertically integrated AI-powered factories. how? by building and training AI to make molds better, cheaper, and faster than anyone on earth. an evolution for the american industrial base. thread...
today, only a small vanishing pool of highly specialized labor actually dictates the pace of the physical economy: tool & die makers. these highly skilled tradespeople are the engine and translational layer between designing a product and manufacturing it. Image
every year, a majority of goods in the world are made with manufacturing methods that rely on tool & die makers: molding, casting, stamping, and forging. application, material, budget, lead time, and quality level dictate which method is used. Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(