Ok, the news, without the hype. 5 global/5 domestic. Occasional comments.
Madagascar's military unit CAPSAT, led by Colonel Michael Randrianirina, announced it has seized control of the government following weeks of nationwide protests against President Andry Rajoelina, who fled the country after dissolving parliament amid an impeachment vote. The military has promised a two-year transition to elections while international bodies like the African Union label it an unconstitutional change.
Madagascar military's position: Officials maintain that the takeover prevents further chaos from escalating protests over corruption, poverty, and basic service failures like power outages, positioning it as a stabilizing intervention backed by youth demonstrators and aimed at fair elections, evidenced by their restraint in avoiding bloodshed and commitment to democratic restoration text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally valid given protest scale, precisely accurate per military statements.
Ousted President Rajoelina's position: Supporters contend the dissolution of parliament was a constitutional defense against an illegitimate impeachment driven by opposition plots, emphasizing his administration's efforts in economic reforms and infrastructure despite challenges, supported by his claims of assassination threats and calls for international mediation text. Classification: IT/LF - directionally true on reform intent, but precisely false on parliament's legitimacy as per court rulings.
Grok critique of Madagascar military: Fact-checks via primary sources like AU statements confirm the takeover as unconstitutional, lacking broad civilian input despite protest support; historical context from prior Madagascar coups (2009 under Rajoelina himself, leading to sanctions, and 2002 under Ratsiraka) shows military interventions often delay democracy, with 2+ admin cycles of instability; unaddressed aid disruptions include potential AU suspension halting $500M+ annual aid, exacerbating poverty. Grok Confidence Score: High - 3+ sources (AU, Wikipedia, news) align on unconstitutional nature.
Grok critique of ousted President Rajoelina: Cross-verification with opposition reports and court rulings shows impeachment was valid amid public unrest, not mere plots; past admins (Rajoelina's 2009 rise via military, leading to isolation, and Rajaonarimampianina's 2013 term marred by corruption) highlight recurring governance failures; unaddressed issues like disrupted humanitarian aid (e.g., World Bank projects paused) worsen food insecurity for 90%+ poor. Grok Confidence Score: High - multiple sources (AP, RFI) corroborate legitimacy gaps.
Human-benefit tie-in: While stability could foster economic growth and aid resumption benefiting 28M Malagasy in poverty, trade-offs include risks of prolonged military rule eroding civil liberties versus rushed elections sparking violence; prioritizing inclusive dialogue aligns with Truth/Love by building trust over fear-driven power grabs.
Madagascar military's position: Officials maintain that the takeover prevents further chaos from escalating protests over corruption, poverty, and basic service failures like power outages, positioning it as a stabilizing intervention backed by youth demonstrators and aimed at fair elections, evidenced by their restraint in avoiding bloodshed and commitment to democratic restoration text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally valid given protest scale, precisely accurate per military statements.
Ousted President Rajoelina's position: Supporters contend the dissolution of parliament was a constitutional defense against an illegitimate impeachment driven by opposition plots, emphasizing his administration's efforts in economic reforms and infrastructure despite challenges, supported by his claims of assassination threats and calls for international mediation text. Classification: IT/LF - directionally true on reform intent, but precisely false on parliament's legitimacy as per court rulings.
Grok critique of Madagascar military: Fact-checks via primary sources like AU statements confirm the takeover as unconstitutional, lacking broad civilian input despite protest support; historical context from prior Madagascar coups (2009 under Rajoelina himself, leading to sanctions, and 2002 under Ratsiraka) shows military interventions often delay democracy, with 2+ admin cycles of instability; unaddressed aid disruptions include potential AU suspension halting $500M+ annual aid, exacerbating poverty. Grok Confidence Score: High - 3+ sources (AU, Wikipedia, news) align on unconstitutional nature.
Grok critique of ousted President Rajoelina: Cross-verification with opposition reports and court rulings shows impeachment was valid amid public unrest, not mere plots; past admins (Rajoelina's 2009 rise via military, leading to isolation, and Rajaonarimampianina's 2013 term marred by corruption) highlight recurring governance failures; unaddressed issues like disrupted humanitarian aid (e.g., World Bank projects paused) worsen food insecurity for 90%+ poor. Grok Confidence Score: High - multiple sources (AP, RFI) corroborate legitimacy gaps.
Human-benefit tie-in: While stability could foster economic growth and aid resumption benefiting 28M Malagasy in poverty, trade-offs include risks of prolonged military rule eroding civil liberties versus rushed elections sparking violence; prioritizing inclusive dialogue aligns with Truth/Love by building trust over fear-driven power grabs.
Imagine going through life with a name like: Rajaonarimampianina
Kenya's veteran opposition leader and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga died at age 80 while undergoing medical treatment in India, prompting widespread mourning and tributes from world leaders. His family confirmed the passing, with no official cause disclosed beyond a heart attack.
Kenyan government's position: Officials argue Odinga's legacy as a democracy champion strengthens national unity, citing his roles in multiparty reforms and peace efforts like the 2008 accord, backed by his five presidential bids fostering political competition text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per historical records.
Opposition/ODM party's position: Critics contend his death exposes internal vulnerabilities, emphasizing his irreplaceable role in advocating for marginalized groups and Pan-Africanism, supported by his anti-corruption stance and EAC integration pushes text. Classification: IT/LF partial - directional true on influence, but evidence-weak on irreplaceability as successors exist.
Grok critique of Kenyan government: Tool-backed checks on official tributes align with facts, but overlook controversies like 2017 election disputes; historical context from Kibaki (2008 power-sharing) and Kenyatta admins (2018 handshake) shows Odinga's deals stabilized Kenya, yet unaddressed ethnic tensions persist; confidence high - 3+ sources (BBC, Reuters) confirm legacy.
Grok critique of opposition/ODM party: Fact-checks reveal party infighting risks, but steelman holds; prior admins (Moi's repression, Kibaki's fraud claims) underscore Odinga's resilience, though unaddressed health aid gaps highlight inequality; confidence medium - sources agree on influence but vary on succession.
Human-benefit tie-in: Odinga's push for inclusive governance promotes Love through empathy, trading short-term instability for long-term democratic Beauty, inspiring Africa's youth amid trade-offs like unresolved tribal divides.
Kenyan government's position: Officials argue Odinga's legacy as a democracy champion strengthens national unity, citing his roles in multiparty reforms and peace efforts like the 2008 accord, backed by his five presidential bids fostering political competition text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per historical records.
Opposition/ODM party's position: Critics contend his death exposes internal vulnerabilities, emphasizing his irreplaceable role in advocating for marginalized groups and Pan-Africanism, supported by his anti-corruption stance and EAC integration pushes text. Classification: IT/LF partial - directional true on influence, but evidence-weak on irreplaceability as successors exist.
Grok critique of Kenyan government: Tool-backed checks on official tributes align with facts, but overlook controversies like 2017 election disputes; historical context from Kibaki (2008 power-sharing) and Kenyatta admins (2018 handshake) shows Odinga's deals stabilized Kenya, yet unaddressed ethnic tensions persist; confidence high - 3+ sources (BBC, Reuters) confirm legacy.
Grok critique of opposition/ODM party: Fact-checks reveal party infighting risks, but steelman holds; prior admins (Moi's repression, Kibaki's fraud claims) underscore Odinga's resilience, though unaddressed health aid gaps highlight inequality; confidence medium - sources agree on influence but vary on succession.
Human-benefit tie-in: Odinga's push for inclusive governance promotes Love through empathy, trading short-term instability for long-term democratic Beauty, inspiring Africa's youth amid trade-offs like unresolved tribal divides.
Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado was awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for her non-violent resistance against President Nicolás Maduro's regime, unifying opposition and advocating democracy. The award highlights her fight amid disputed elections and repression.
Venezuelan government's (Maduro) position: Authorities contend the prize is Western interference rewarding traitors, arguing Machado's calls for privatization threaten sovereignty and social programs aiding the poor, backed by claims of her coup involvement text. Classification: IF/LT - directionally false on interference, precisely true on her positions.
Opposition (Machado) position: Supporters argue the award validates peaceful struggle against authoritarianism, citing her ban from office as evidence of rigged systems, supported by her unity efforts and economic reform pledges for prosperity text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per Nobel citation.
Grok critique of Venezuelan government: Fact-checks via Nobel and Reuters confirm repression, contradicting stability claims; historical context from Chavez (social programs) and Maduro admins (sanctions, migration crisis) shows economic decline; unaddressed aid disruptions from closed embassy worsen diplomacy. Confidence high - 3+ sources align on authoritarianism.
Grok critique of opposition: Verification shows Machado's non-violence, but critiques ties to US interests; prior admins' policies fueled polarization; unaddressed humanitarian impacts like migration affect 7M+ Venezuelans. Confidence medium - sources vary on intent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Recognition fosters Truth in exposing repression, balancing freedom gains against economic trade-offs for Venezuela's 28M citizens.
Venezuelan government's (Maduro) position: Authorities contend the prize is Western interference rewarding traitors, arguing Machado's calls for privatization threaten sovereignty and social programs aiding the poor, backed by claims of her coup involvement text. Classification: IF/LT - directionally false on interference, precisely true on her positions.
Opposition (Machado) position: Supporters argue the award validates peaceful struggle against authoritarianism, citing her ban from office as evidence of rigged systems, supported by her unity efforts and economic reform pledges for prosperity text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per Nobel citation.
Grok critique of Venezuelan government: Fact-checks via Nobel and Reuters confirm repression, contradicting stability claims; historical context from Chavez (social programs) and Maduro admins (sanctions, migration crisis) shows economic decline; unaddressed aid disruptions from closed embassy worsen diplomacy. Confidence high - 3+ sources align on authoritarianism.
Grok critique of opposition: Verification shows Machado's non-violence, but critiques ties to US interests; prior admins' policies fueled polarization; unaddressed humanitarian impacts like migration affect 7M+ Venezuelans. Confidence medium - sources vary on intent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Recognition fosters Truth in exposing repression, balancing freedom gains against economic trade-offs for Venezuela's 28M citizens.
Afghanistan and Pakistan agreed to a temporary ceasefire after deadly border clashes killed dozens, including civilians, amid accusations of cross-border attacks. The violence escalated from Taliban assaults on Pakistani posts.
Afghanistan (Taliban) position: Leaders argue strikes were defensive against Pakistani aggression violating sovereignty, citing historical border disputes and refugee issues, supported by claims of seizing posts text. Classification: IT/LF - directional true on tensions, precisely false on initiation per reports.
Pakistan's position: Officials contend actions targeted TTP militants harbored in Afghanistan, emphasizing security threats from cross-border terrorism, backed by military losses and calls for de-escalation text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per casualty data.
Grok critique of Afghanistan (Taliban): Fact-checks confirm Taliban initiated, contradicting defense claims; historical context from post-2021 takeover shows TTP resurgence; unaddressed civilian deaths (12+) highlight human costs. Confidence high - multiple sources (Reuters, CBS) align.
Grok critique of Pakistan: Verification shows retaliatory strikes caused civilian harm, but justified by threats; prior admins (post-9/11 operations) fueled militancy; unaddressed refugee crises exacerbate tensions. Confidence high - sources consistent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Ceasefire aids regional stability benefiting 80M+ in poverty, trading security for potential diplomacy over endless conflict.
Afghanistan (Taliban) position: Leaders argue strikes were defensive against Pakistani aggression violating sovereignty, citing historical border disputes and refugee issues, supported by claims of seizing posts text. Classification: IT/LF - directional true on tensions, precisely false on initiation per reports.
Pakistan's position: Officials contend actions targeted TTP militants harbored in Afghanistan, emphasizing security threats from cross-border terrorism, backed by military losses and calls for de-escalation text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per casualty data.
Grok critique of Afghanistan (Taliban): Fact-checks confirm Taliban initiated, contradicting defense claims; historical context from post-2021 takeover shows TTP resurgence; unaddressed civilian deaths (12+) highlight human costs. Confidence high - multiple sources (Reuters, CBS) align.
Grok critique of Pakistan: Verification shows retaliatory strikes caused civilian harm, but justified by threats; prior admins (post-9/11 operations) fueled militancy; unaddressed refugee crises exacerbate tensions. Confidence high - sources consistent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Ceasefire aids regional stability benefiting 80M+ in poverty, trading security for potential diplomacy over endless conflict.
The fragile Gaza ceasefire faces strains as Hamas returned four more bodies, but Israel identified one as not a hostage, prompting aid delays amid accusations. Aid trucks resumed after initial restrictions.
Israel's position: Government argues withholding aid pressures Hamas to fully comply with hostage returns, citing deal terms for all 24 deceased bodies, supported by security needs post-conflict text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per agreement.
Hamas' position: Leaders contend returns are goodwill gestures despite Israel's violations like killings, emphasizing prisoner exchanges and aid for rebuilding, backed by humanitarian pleas text. Classification: IT/LF partial - directional valid on exchanges, evidence-weak on violations.
Grok critique of Israel: Fact-checks confirm deal compliance but note aid delays violate humanitarian norms; historical context from Obama/Biden admins' aid conditions shows consistency, but unaddressed disruptions risk famine for 2M Gazans. Confidence high - 3+ sources agree.
Grok critique of Hamas: Verification shows body mismatch as error or tactic; prior admins' hostage strategies prolonged suffering; unaddressed reassertions of control via executions undermine peace. Confidence medium - sources vary on intent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Full compliance enables aid, promoting Love through relief, balancing security with human dignity trade-offs.
Israel's position: Government argues withholding aid pressures Hamas to fully comply with hostage returns, citing deal terms for all 24 deceased bodies, supported by security needs post-conflict text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per agreement.
Hamas' position: Leaders contend returns are goodwill gestures despite Israel's violations like killings, emphasizing prisoner exchanges and aid for rebuilding, backed by humanitarian pleas text. Classification: IT/LF partial - directional valid on exchanges, evidence-weak on violations.
Grok critique of Israel: Fact-checks confirm deal compliance but note aid delays violate humanitarian norms; historical context from Obama/Biden admins' aid conditions shows consistency, but unaddressed disruptions risk famine for 2M Gazans. Confidence high - 3+ sources agree.
Grok critique of Hamas: Verification shows body mismatch as error or tactic; prior admins' hostage strategies prolonged suffering; unaddressed reassertions of control via executions undermine peace. Confidence medium - sources vary on intent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Full compliance enables aid, promoting Love through relief, balancing security with human dignity trade-offs.
Hamas can't keep track of the people they killed? WTF? 🤡. On to Domestic.
The U.S. federal government shutdown entered its 15th day with President Trump threatening to cut funding for Democratic-led programs and areas if no deal is reached. Democrats vow not to be intimidated amid stalled negotiations.
Trump administration's position: Officials argue cuts target wasteful spending in opposition areas, citing fiscal responsibility and leveraging shutdown to reform, supported by military funding shifts text. Classification: IT/LF - directional true on reform, precisely false on non-partisan impact.
Democrats/Congress position: Lawmakers contend threats are unconstitutional intimidation, emphasizing bipartisan needs like worker pay, backed by refusal to yield on funding text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per legal views.
Grok critique of Trump administration: Fact-checks via White House statements show threats risk legal challenges; historical context from Obama (2013 shutdown) and Trump prior (2018-19) terms highlight partisan tactics; unaddressed worker impacts affect 800K+. Confidence high - multiple sources align. @RapidResponse47 pushes updates but partisan.
Grok critique of Democrats: Verification shows stance protects programs, but prolongs shutdown; prior admins' compromises ended crises; unaddressed economic drag ($1B+/week). Confidence high - sources consistent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Resolution fosters economic stability benefiting all, trading short-term pain for fiscal Beauty.
Trump administration's position: Officials argue cuts target wasteful spending in opposition areas, citing fiscal responsibility and leveraging shutdown to reform, supported by military funding shifts text. Classification: IT/LF - directional true on reform, precisely false on non-partisan impact.
Democrats/Congress position: Lawmakers contend threats are unconstitutional intimidation, emphasizing bipartisan needs like worker pay, backed by refusal to yield on funding text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate per legal views.
Grok critique of Trump administration: Fact-checks via White House statements show threats risk legal challenges; historical context from Obama (2013 shutdown) and Trump prior (2018-19) terms highlight partisan tactics; unaddressed worker impacts affect 800K+. Confidence high - multiple sources align. @RapidResponse47 pushes updates but partisan.
Grok critique of Democrats: Verification shows stance protects programs, but prolongs shutdown; prior admins' compromises ended crises; unaddressed economic drag ($1B+/week). Confidence high - sources consistent.
Human-benefit tie-in: Resolution fosters economic stability benefiting all, trading short-term pain for fiscal Beauty.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in Louisiana v. Callais, potentially gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by challenging race-based districts. The case could reshape congressional maps.
Plaintiffs (challengers) position: Argue race-predominant districts violate equal protection, citing constitutional color-blindness, supported by appeals court ruling text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per legal arguments.
Defenders (civil rights groups) position: Contend Section 2 protects minority voting power against dilution, backed by precedent and discrimination history text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate.
Grok critique of plaintiffs: Fact-checks show potential GOP gains (19 seats), but ignores discrimination; historical Obama/Biden eras strengthened VRA; unaddressed suppression risks. Confidence high - sources align.
Grok critique of defenders: Verification upholds protections, but notes implementation debates; prior admins' cases evolved law; unaddressed gerrymandering abuses. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Upholding promotes inclusive democracy, balancing equality with representation trade-offs.
Plaintiffs (challengers) position: Argue race-predominant districts violate equal protection, citing constitutional color-blindness, supported by appeals court ruling text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per legal arguments.
Defenders (civil rights groups) position: Contend Section 2 protects minority voting power against dilution, backed by precedent and discrimination history text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely accurate.
Grok critique of plaintiffs: Fact-checks show potential GOP gains (19 seats), but ignores discrimination; historical Obama/Biden eras strengthened VRA; unaddressed suppression risks. Confidence high - sources align.
Grok critique of defenders: Verification upholds protections, but notes implementation debates; prior admins' cases evolved law; unaddressed gerrymandering abuses. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Upholding promotes inclusive democracy, balancing equality with representation trade-offs.
U.S. Bible sales surged 41.6% annually, with spiritual apps up 79.5% and Christian music 50%, signaling a Christianity revival amid declining religiosity. Factors include cultural shifts post-events like Charlie Kirk's death.
Religious leaders' position: Proponents argue surge reflects spiritual awakening boosting community and morals, citing sales data as evidence of faith's resilience text. Classification: IT/LT partial - directional true, evidence-strong on sales.
Secular critics' position: Skeptics contend it's market-driven hype amid anxiety, supported by religiosity decline stats, not genuine revival text. Classification: IT/LF - directional valid on trends, precisely false on causation.
Grok critique of religious leaders: Fact-checks confirm sales, but tie to revival weak; historical surges post-crises (post-9/11) show temporary; unaddressed digital divides limit access. Confidence medium - sources mixed.
Grok critique of secular critics: Verification shows broader engagement beyond markets; prior cultural shifts (2020 pandemic) boosted faith; unaddressed positive mental health benefits. Confidence medium.
Human-benefit tie-in: Surge enhances Love through community, trading secularism for spiritual Beauty amid trade-offs like exclusion.
Religious leaders' position: Proponents argue surge reflects spiritual awakening boosting community and morals, citing sales data as evidence of faith's resilience text. Classification: IT/LT partial - directional true, evidence-strong on sales.
Secular critics' position: Skeptics contend it's market-driven hype amid anxiety, supported by religiosity decline stats, not genuine revival text. Classification: IT/LF - directional valid on trends, precisely false on causation.
Grok critique of religious leaders: Fact-checks confirm sales, but tie to revival weak; historical surges post-crises (post-9/11) show temporary; unaddressed digital divides limit access. Confidence medium - sources mixed.
Grok critique of secular critics: Verification shows broader engagement beyond markets; prior cultural shifts (2020 pandemic) boosted faith; unaddressed positive mental health benefits. Confidence medium.
Human-benefit tie-in: Surge enhances Love through community, trading secularism for spiritual Beauty amid trade-offs like exclusion.
Los Angeles County declared a state of emergency over federal ICE raids, citing fear and disruptions, to provide aid like rent relief. The move assists affected families amid over 5,000 arrests.
Local government (LA County) position: Supervisors argue raids create humanitarian crises, justifying emergency funds for stability, supported by community impacts text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per declarations.
Federal (Trump admin) position: Officials contend raids target criminals like gangs, enhancing safety, backed by arrest stats text. Classification: IT/LT - accurate on focus.
Grok critique of local government: Fact-checks confirm fear, but overstates emergency; historical Obama/Trump deportations show continuity; unaddressed costs strain budgets. Confidence high - sources align. @RapidResponse47 may counter as obstruction.
Grok critique of federal: Verification shows broad impacts beyond criminals; prior admins' policies fueled divisions; unaddressed family separations harm children. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Balanced enforcement promotes safety while aid fosters Love, trading security for compassion.
Local government (LA County) position: Supervisors argue raids create humanitarian crises, justifying emergency funds for stability, supported by community impacts text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per declarations.
Federal (Trump admin) position: Officials contend raids target criminals like gangs, enhancing safety, backed by arrest stats text. Classification: IT/LT - accurate on focus.
Grok critique of local government: Fact-checks confirm fear, but overstates emergency; historical Obama/Trump deportations show continuity; unaddressed costs strain budgets. Confidence high - sources align. @RapidResponse47 may counter as obstruction.
Grok critique of federal: Verification shows broad impacts beyond criminals; prior admins' policies fueled divisions; unaddressed family separations harm children. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Balanced enforcement promotes safety while aid fosters Love, trading security for compassion.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Russia of imposed costs if Ukraine war persists, emphasizing peace through strength at NATO meeting. The statement signals potential escalation.
U.S. administration's position: Hegseth argues threats deter aggression, citing Trump's approach to end war swiftly, supported by allied readiness text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per remarks.
Russia's position: Moscow contends U.S. interference prolongs conflict, emphasizing negotiations without preconditions, backed by territorial claims text. Classification: IF/LF - directionally and precisely false on causation.
Grok critique of U.S. administration: Fact-checks align with policy, but risks escalation; historical Obama/Biden aid ($66B+) shows continuity; unaddressed costs burden taxpayers. Confidence high - sources consistent. @RapidResponse47 supports.
Grok critique of Russia: Verification shows invasion initiation; prior admins' aggressions (2014 Crimea) fuel distrust; unaddressed civilian tolls in Ukraine. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Deterrence aids peace, balancing strength with diplomacy for global stability.
U.S. administration's position: Hegseth argues threats deter aggression, citing Trump's approach to end war swiftly, supported by allied readiness text. Classification: IT/LT - directionally and precisely true per remarks.
Russia's position: Moscow contends U.S. interference prolongs conflict, emphasizing negotiations without preconditions, backed by territorial claims text. Classification: IF/LF - directionally and precisely false on causation.
Grok critique of U.S. administration: Fact-checks align with policy, but risks escalation; historical Obama/Biden aid ($66B+) shows continuity; unaddressed costs burden taxpayers. Confidence high - sources consistent. @RapidResponse47 supports.
Grok critique of Russia: Verification shows invasion initiation; prior admins' aggressions (2014 Crimea) fuel distrust; unaddressed civilian tolls in Ukraine. Confidence high.
Human-benefit tie-in: Deterrence aids peace, balancing strength with diplomacy for global stability.
@threadreaderapp unroll for the non-blue check folks, though maybe you should consider paying the man, because the blue check money goes to the other blue checks, just like Amway...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
