On Oct 28, the FCC is set to rollback regulations — passed unanimously last year — and allow predatory correctional telecoms and greedy sheriffs get back to business as usual exploiting families. Here's what to know. THREAD
In 2024, the FCC unanimously passed regulations that set "just and reasonable" rate caps for prison and jail phone calls. The new rate caps more than halved previous caps and were projected to save families impacted by incarceration $550 million annually.
After months of lobbying by correctional telecoms and sheriffs who were set to lose their precious kickbacks, the FCC suspend the implementation of the rules in July 2025. Just two months later, it released new regulations that rollback the 2024 rules.
The new rules drastically increase rate caps, with the prison cap going from $0.06 to $0.11 per minute. To arrive at these new figures, the FCC reversed its prior position that prohibited providers from charging incarcerated people and their families for their own surveillance.
To start, the weighted average phone call rate across all prisons is currently $0.049 per minute, lower than the 2024 rate cap of $0.06 per minute and not even half of the revised 2025 rate cap of $0.11 per minute.
Only three states — FL, KY, and OK — currently have rates above the new rate cap, meaning that 94% of prison systems are at or below the revised rate cap. But more importantly, 76% of prison systems would already be compliant with the 2024 rate cap today.
In fact, a dozen state prison systems had already complied with the 2024 regulations before the FCC paused implementation; and despite the pause, the majority have maintained their new lower rates, contrary to assertions that these new rates are untenable for the industry.
45 prison systems would've been impacted by the 2024 rules. Now, just 19 prison systems will be. As a result, the portion of the prison population that will experience relief has dropped from 78% to 42%, with 446k fewer people in prison, and their families, benefiting.
In all, the revised rules will deliver $215 million less in financial relief to families each year. The largest drop is felt by those in prisons (-49%) as well as the largest and smallest jails (-29% in jails over 1,000, -27% in jails over 350, and -27% in jails under 50).
Most importantly, the new rules will severely dampen the increase in communication that the regulation of the industry intended to generate, from 2.1 billion additional call minutes a year to just 714 million, a drop of 66%.
The FCC is being manipulated by a predatory industry that is transparently colluding with state and local agencies vexed about an impending loss of revenue they should have never been privy to but collected for decades.
Correctional telecom providers and their partner agencies have threatened to deny incarcerated people communication services if their unjust financial windfall is not restored in an effort to suggest that the industry cannot survive the 2024 regulations.
So far only one rural jail has taken such action and, despite the suspension of the rules, it has not returned communications services to its population.
The data released by @WorthRises today demonstrates the absurdity of this claim. Nearly all prison systems, which hold more than two-thirds of our nation’s incarcerated population, are already at or below the revised rate cap. Many are already compliant with the 2024 rate caps.
Rolling back such important and well-reasoned regulations to address a singular uncompromising jail or concerns that have yet to materialize undermines over a decade of the FCC's work in setting the just and reasonable rates mandated by Congress by the Martha Wright Reed Act.
Families impacted by incarceration deserve real relief — not regulatory backpedaling. The FCC cannot let this predatory industry manipulate the rulemaking process with its audacious claim that it is protecting communication services for incarcerated people.
It should listen to those who rely on these services for connection, support, and survival and their allies — nearly 15,000 of which have filed comments opposing any delay or rollback to the 2024 rules. We'll be asking Commissioners to meet with them.
NEW BOOK! I think I forgot to tell everyone that I wrote a book. It’s the longest thread about the prison industry I’ve ever written, and it’s out this week. I’m honored by the response so far. Please get a copy!
“Many know that corporate interests corrupt the contemporary American prison system, but Bianca Tylek and Worth Rises take an extra step to detail exactly how these interests manifest. With powerful narratives and meticulous analysis, The Prison Industry is an essential read…
for anyone committed to challenging how American prisons operate and dismantling the industry of oppression that sustains them.”
— @dwaynebetts, founder of Freedom Reads, author of Felon: Poems, and MacArthur “Genius” Awardee
Let's talk about audacity today, specifically the audacity of the nation's largest private prison firm GEO Group, which is preparing to collect a windfall from Trump's election. From wild exec statements to indefensible legal stances, GEO's audacity has reached new levels. 🧵
Some context first: GEO Group emerged in the 1980s, when it got its first immigration detention contract. Since it has grown into a global corporation with over $2.4 billion in revenues annually, more than half of which comes from federal contracts, primarily with ICE.
When the public soured on private prisons, GEO Group began heavily investing in expanding its business, doubling down on immigration. As of 2023, ICE makes up 43% of its revenues, up from 20% just five years earlier. It now has contracts to monitor, detain, and deport immigrants.
WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THIS. Local media ran a story this week that is plainly irresponsible and harmful copaganda, parroting claims from the Bristol Country Sheriff that free calls have increased crime in his jail. Here's why that's ridiculous. 🧵 turnto10.com/i-team/inmate-…
For context, this week marks the first anniversary of No Cost Calls implementation in Massachusetts, a legislative effort that made all calls across the state's prisons and jails free. Backed by a strong community coalition, it's been wildly successful. wgbh.org/news/local/202…
Now, the headline at issue claims that jail crime (measured in criminal charges) is up by 50% this year due to free calls. They want you to ignore that we're talking about just 35 charges in a facility that holds over 650 people and focus on the 50% because that seems dramatic.
Wellpath is the 3rd correctional healthcare provider to file for bankruptcy or liquidate in the last 2 years. It'll survive, but we need to be unpack this story. For-profit prison healthcare providers have been pocketing billions while, quite literally, killing people. THREAD
We're still reading through the filings, which are quickly stacking up. But the multitude of reasons they are in this situation are becoming clear. Almost all of them are related to their inability, or unwillingness, to provide quality care, from staff retention to lawsuits.
Wellpath is blaming minimum wage hikes for their increased labor costs. This is interesting because there are likely very few healthcare positions that should be paid minimum wage in a prison, but it explains a lot about their staffing crisis and the resulting increase in costs.
There is something huge happening in the prison industry and no one appears to be paying attention: the correctional healthcare sector is collapsing. THREAD
WellPath is the next in a line of prison healthcare corporations facing financial troubles. Despite billions in revenue, they can’t seem to stay afloat. Preliminary reporting claims that it’s because of increased labor costs, but that’s not the real story. So what is it?
Prison healthcare providers are failing for 2 reasons: (1) medical malpractice is actually really expensive and is creating financial obligations bigger and faster than expected and (2) private equity owners are saddling them with unaffordable debt that require more cost cutting.
THREAD 🧵 This game-changing legislation just introduced in NYC has been a long time in the works and has the potential to revolutionize correctional telecom by reversing its invasive reach into our privacy and uprooting the underlying justification for its egregious prices.
This effort dates back to 2018, when we passed another first-of-its-kind bill in NYC that made all jail calls free and spurred a nationwide movement for free correctional communication. During the hearing, councilmembers began asking about the surveillance of jail calls.
A key concern emerged around the universal monitoring of jail calls: Was it fair that only people detained pretrial, many of whom simply couldn’t afford bail, were being surveilled, thus hindering their ability to participate in their own defense, and not those who were released?