Here is the indictment. d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2025/10…
...The indictment recounts numerous alleged incidents of transmitting classified information to third parties as opposed to the removal of actual documents. Notably, Count 6 is described as the revelation of “intelligence concerning a foreign country’s interactions with an adversary; in quotation marks direct statement collected via intelligence source and methods on a foreign country.” This was allegedly Top secret information. It allegedly included foreign intelligence describing an adversary’s planned attack on a facility.”
...Count 9 is described as Av2 “reveals intelligence about future attack by adversarial group in another country.” It is rated at Top Secret/SI. Count 11 “reveals intelligence that a foreign adversary was planning a missile launch in the future.” Others concern covert programs by the U.S...
...Bolton is likely to argue that these diary entries and notes often concerned prior operations or intelligence long past their most sensitive periods of use...
...Once again, the court could play a determinative part in how it instructs the jury and restricts certain arguments. The government will argue that, if the material is classified, it does not matter if it is transferred to a secondary source or if it is classified but dated.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
