I have to do another thread about this because there is so much dishonesty and really sick spin coming from an element of Labour. 1/13
This is a UK wide issue, it is an outcome of asylum policy, not of Glasgow City Council's homelessness policy. I would highlight two core drivers. Firstly asylum seekers are not allowed to work while their claims are processed (with a very limited exemption). 2/13
If their claim for asylum is accepted, they are given 28 days to leave the accommodation provided to them by the Home Office. That's not enough time for people to be able to source their own accommodation, so the system effectively pushes them into homelessness. 3/13
The 2nd major factor is the asylum backlog. This was allowed to build up by the Tories with 100s of 1000s of outstanding cases & appeals. This is the main reason so many asylum seekers are in hotels, as the system is bursting at the seams. 4/13
The priority for the UK gov is to work through that backlog asap, in large part so they can get asylum seekers out of hotels & remove that attack line from Reform. They are right to do this but wrong to ignore the knock on effects for local authorities. Let me explain. 5/13
Once an asylum claim is accepted, the claimant is granted leave to remain in the UK and so they come within the scope of local authorities. This means that when they get kicked out of their Home Office provided accommodation they are directed towards homelessness services. 6/13
It's really important to understand this is how the asylum system works. It does not give asylum seekers the option of being able to stand on their own feet. It makes them dependent on state support and explicitly pushes them into local authority homelessness services. 7/13
As we've seen, to clear the backlog asylum claims are now being expedited quickly resulting in large numbers of refugees coming into those homelessness services all at once, which the system can't cope with. So we have a crisis situation, with a big spike in homelessness. 8/13
To reiterate, this is a UK wide issue but let's now look at the specific situation with Glasgow. It is true that large numbers of homeless refugees are being drawn to Glasgow because our services are better than in the rest of the UK. 9/13
This is a problem for us - but it is not a fault! It's incredible to watch Labour people lining up to condemn Glasgow for providing better services for homeless people than other cities do, as though that is a bad thing. That's actually sick. 10/13
It is not a sustainable situation for us but the answer is not to make our services worse! It is for other councils to do more to help & for the UK gov to provide funding to enable that. And to compensate Glasgow for the additional expenditure we have already incurred. 11/13
That's what Labour politicians should be saying. Instead you get some describing a council trying to help homeless people stay off the streets as "virtue signalling". It's not virtue signalling - it is what we are meant to do! 12/13
It's some level of twisted spin to try and turn a crisis which is the direct outcome of UK gov actions into an attack on a council for trying to fulfil its statutory obligations to provide homeless people with a roof over their heads. But that's where we are now. Sickening. 13/13

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Mhairi Hunter 🏴󠁧󠁒󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ

Mhairi Hunter 🏴󠁧󠁒󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MhairiHunter

Jul 17
Some interesting chat re Lab MPs losing the whip. From my point of view it is morally rather murky and let me explain why. It is entirely legitimate to remove the whip from elected members for voting against party policy/manifesto commitments/group decisions. 🧡
When someone is vetted they commit to abide by their party policy and manifesto & by decisions of their group. They cannot retrospectively withdraw that commitment once elected, that's not how commitments work. So it is entirely legitimate to discipline people who defy the whip.
But what happens when the leadership itself goes off piste and starts to introduce measures that no-one voted for? And enforces them by compulsion? (Cos if you think Lab MPs voluntarily signed up to support huge cuts to benefits I have a bridge to sell you).
Read 7 tweets
Aug 26, 2024
Reading over Scotpol Twitter analysis of the SNP's travails over the past few days just reinforces to me how divorced a lot of it is from reality. I'm not saying we don't have problems, of course we do. And lots are of our own making. But the context isn't. & we have Keir >
> Starmer's personal assurance that the context is going to get worse. I'm proud of John Swinney for being the only major party leader to tell the truth about that during the election. Almost everyone else lied. To some extent we are hoist by our own petard because I think we >
> downplayed the difficulty of managing austerity. That's in the nature of things. If you're elected to government you do the best with the hand you're dealt. But we're at the point now where austerity can't be managed much further. This is actually the biggest challenge for >
Read 7 tweets
Jun 3, 2024
I'm going to do a wee thread/rant on the NHS here so either bear with me or move on. I'm glad the SNP campaign is explicitly arguing that there needs to be a significant funding uplift for the NHS - & please don't forget social care because, without that, investment in the>
> acute sector won't deliver the outcomes we need. Why is this needed? Over a decade of austerity has meant that capacity in the health & care system has not expanded to meet the rising demand that comes with an aging population. Budgets have risen but not by enough. That is the>
> core problem. It's in the nature of things that politicians will try to deliver the best outcomes they can with the resources they have but it's also important to level with people that the system needs more resources to compensate for the impact of austerity. (Covid has also >
Read 10 tweets
Oct 14, 2023
Thread on the upcoming vote at Conference on our strategy for WM election. I am disposed to vote for the proposal to offer a vote on independence. There are various amendments which I don't think substantively change it and which I will vote for.
Some members disagree with the resolution in principle. They have every right to. Their argument is that we should instead focus on building support by governing well and seeking more powers. But I think Scotgov is governing well and there will be no more powers.
I'm not sure it is fully understood how great the financial pressure on Scotgov is due to the catastrophic state of the UK economy. Policies like the Scottish Child Payment are protecting people during the cost of living crisis. This is governing well but it comes at a cost.
Read 15 tweets
Aug 8, 2023
There follows a thread on this Daily Record stuff because I think it throws up some interesting questions. What's the story? Well, the Labour Party obtained details of 58,000 credit card transactions carried out by Scottish civil servants & fed them to the Daily Record.
The main "gotcha" point the paper has run with today is that Scotgov spent a total of Β£10,000 on VIP airport services. The subtext of the hooh hah about this is of the "who do they think they are?" variety. Think "jumped up glorified councillors" etc.
I don't think this happens to the same extent in any other country. Objectively, the head of government is a VIP. Whether you love or loathe the individual occupying it, the office of First Minister is an important one, with different security needs to the general population.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 25, 2023
Read some commentary on Humza Yousaf's speech yesterday. Many suggest there is confusion about what he proposes Scotgov would do in the event that the SNP wins the next WM election in Scotland on an indy platform. In fact, HY set out *exactly* what he thinks they should do. πŸ‘‡
He believes they should seek negotiations with UK Gov on how to give effect to the proposition that Scotland should be an independent country. To support this they would take the following three actions.
1. Publish a draft withdrawal and new partnership agreement, setting out the terms Scotgov seeks, including draft legal text on transferring the powers necessary to achieve independence from Westminster to Holyrood & proposed future cooperation arrangements with rUK.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(