🧵1/ The cry of “No Kings” echoes through American history
It’s a reminder that power belongs to the people, not unaccountable rulers
Today, that principle is under threat—not from wearers of crowns, but from federal bureaucrats who make binding laws without ever facing a vote
2/ The Constitution vests lawmaking power in Congress, elected by you
Yet federal agencies churn out roughly 100,000 pages of binding regulations—effectively laws—every year
These bureaucrats, who never stand for election, dictate how Americans live and work
That’s not liberty
That’s despotic rule by fiat
3/ Examples are wide-ranging but include EPA’s sweeping environmental rules, OSHA’s workplace mandates, or the FDA’s product restrictions
These agencies often bypass Congress, creating binding rules that carry the force of law
In 2024 alone, over 3,000 new regulations were issued
Who elected these rulemakers?
Nobody
Like kings
4/ This is where the REINS Act comes in
It’s simple: any major regulation (with an economic impact of $100M+) must get a vote in Congress before it takes effect
No more backdoor lawmaking
Congress—your elected senators and representatives—takes back its constitutional duty
5/ The REINS Act isn’t about red tape; it’s about accountability
If a regulation is truly necessary, Congress can debate and approve it
If it’s a power grab by unelected elites, it gets stopped
That’s how we ensure the people’s voice matters—not the whims of bureaucrats
6/ “No Kings” *should* mean no one makes law without answering to the people through regular elections
Letting unelected bureaucrats make laws—to the tune of 100,000 pages a year—violates that principle
The REINS Act would restore it by putting lawmaking back where it belongs: with Congress, accountable to you
Let’s pass it and send a clear message
🇺🇸 #REINSAct
7/ Please pass this message along if you agree that the American people should never be subject to laws passed by the unelected—whether royal or bureaucratic
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m not sure why, but “F the Mormons” chants have become far too common at BYU’s away games
Funny thing—the host schools generally don’t seem to be the least bit concerned about it, even though all of them have many Latter-day Saints enrolled as students
🚨 🧵 🚨
How Democrats Are Trying To Enlist Republicans In The Dem Effort To Move America Toward Socialized Medicine
1. Dems enact Obamacare “to make healthcare affordable”—with *every* Republican opposing it and warning that Obamacare will make healthcare more expensive, not less
2. Obamacare makes healthcare *less* affordable, with premiums going up every year, even as coverage and quality steadily diminish
Meanwhile, huge healthcare companies get rich as they consolidate and minimize competition, facilitated by Obamacare’s onerous regulations
3. Trying to hide Obamacare’s failures, Dems extend and expand Obamacare premium subsidies—again with every Republican in Congress opposing that move
🧵 1/ No other success a country enjoys—economically, intellectually, technologically, or otherwise—can compensate for a collapse in that country’s birth rate, which culminates in unmitigated societal demise
2/ Low birth rate and population collapse leads to extinction
3/ Human extinction cancels all other human advances—in knowledge, wealth, prosperity, and every other achievement
🚨🧵 1/Repost if you think this is yet another good reason to end universal mail-in voting
2/ USPS unions like the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) & American Postal Workers Union (APWU) routinely endorse presidential candidates
Both NALC and APWU endorsed Kamala Harris in 2024 & all postal-worker unions overwhelmingly favor Democrats when they endorse
3/ This creates at least a potential conflict of interest, given that USPS handles tens of millions of mail-in ballots with each election—99.22 million in 2024 alone
If a union backs one candidate, could that influence ballot handling?
1/ Utah is a Republican state—one that has been served by exclusively Republican governors for decades. And we’ve had decades of Republican majorities in both chambers of the legislature. Why, then, does Utah have a number of avowed leftists serving in its judicial system?
2/ Utah’s judicial nomination system is broken. Republican governors often end up naming left-wing judicial nominees who don’t share their views on the proper role of the courts—including basic concepts like textualism, originalism, and judicial modesty. It’s time for reform—to empower the governor to pick judges who align with the governor’s vision.
#UtahJudicialReform
3/ Here’s how it works today: For each judicial vacancy, a nominating commission (one per judicial district, plus an appellate commission for both the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals) solicits and reviews applications each time a judicial vacancy arises. Each commission consists of seven members appointed by the governor. Members of each commission must be U.S. citizens and Utah residents, and may not be legislators.