The HighWire Profile picture
Oct 29 19 tweets 6 min read Read on X
🧵THREAD: Many have focused on the groundbreaking conclusions of this report, which are vital. But few have focused on the critical history contained in the full PDF.

LINK: zenodo.org/records/174512… x.com/P_McCulloughMD…
2. It’s important to read the introduction, which presents a concise timeline of ASD, its evolution, and the changes in diagnoses. It also explains the controversy surrounding MMR and the contribution of Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues.

We present a summary of this to you, directly from the paper, below.
3. In 1996, an American clinical immunologist named H.H. Fundenberg published a paper in which he claimed that 15 autism patients developed symptoms within a week after immunization with MMR.

During this period, Dr. Wakefield was treating and researching inflammatory bowel disease in the UK, and was contacted by the parents of 8 children who developed both irritable bowel and neurological symptoms after vaccination with MMR.
4. Noticing the close association between vaccination and symptom onset, he and 12 colleagues conducted a study on the children. They presented their findings in a paper that was published in The Lancet in 1998.
5. They characterized a concern that there may be a connection between MMR vaccination and autism, but clearly stated that they “did not prove an association” and asked for further investigation.
6. There wasn’t immediate controversy. The controversy came in 2004, once the American courts set up a proceeding to evaluate the thousands of petitions received by parents alleging that multiple vaccines in early childhood had caused regression into autism.
7. That is when the attacks against Wakefield truly began, saying he had undisclosed conflicts of interest and calling his impartiality into question. The paper makes the connection - this attack coincided with the broader campaign to discredit the parents who had stepped forward with petitions.
8. Of course, the court ruled that no link between vaccines and autism had been proven, and dismissed 5k claims. All but one, that is. That proceeding was controversial in and of itself, and could be its own thread. The DOJ dismissed its own expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, because he had affirmed that there may be a link between vaccination and that one case.
9. The study goes on to explain that the court’s decision actually “flew in the face” of the listed side effects on the package insert for MMR. Side effects like seizures, encephalomyelitis, transverse myelitis, syncope, polyneuropathy, ataxia, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and progressive neurological disorder.
10. CDC estimates confirm the incidence of autism consistently rose every year of the Omnibus Autism Proceeding - 2004-2009, and has continued to rise every year since, with CDC stating now every 1 in 31 children being diagnosed. Image
11. But we can’t stop there. A few more things are important to note before we delve into the diagnostic criteria and how they have changed and shifted over the years - a critical understanding. In 2011, The Lancet bowed to pressure to retract Dr. Wakefield's paper, even though nothing was ever shown to be erroneous.
12. The Diagnosis Criteria: The criteria used to diagnose autism are found in the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness” or DSM - and they’ve changed over the years. In 2013, the DSM-5 advised clinicians that ADHD and ASD could be diagnosed together. This marked a change from previous versions where ASD diagnosis excluded ADHD. The DM5 replaced the prior umbrella term (PDD) that included autistic disorder, asperger disorder, and PDD-NOS (pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified) under ASD.
13. Rett syndrome - a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene - is no longer included within ASD diagnosis and is considered a separate diagnosis. And, it's important to note that ASD has a strong overlap with other conditions that have characteristics linked to encephalitis during childhood - ADHD, dyspraxia/developmental coordination disorder, Tourette's, and dyslexia, to name a few.
14. This classification criterion adds to the difficulty of identifying a specific disorder and its causes.

The valuable introduction to this study continues by detailing the childhood vaccine schedule from birth to 6 years, which includes seasonal vaccines such as COVID-19 and Flu.

As you can see, and as we have documented extensively at ICAN, by the time a child is 6 years old, if they follow the recommended schedule, they are receiving between 41 and 44 injections.Image
15. And this chart says it all: Image
16. The introduction does a superb job of countering the challenges brought on by the changes in diagnostic criteria and increased diagnosis. Why aren't we seeing an increase in adult diagnoses? Currently, more than HALF A MILLION American children live with profound autism - representing approximately 27% of all cases, and that continues to rise:Image
17. We recommend reading the entire introductory section of this paper for a concise review of the history thus far. LINK: .zenodo.org/records/174512…
KEY FINDINGS in the rest of the study (SOURCE: thefocalpoints.com/?utm_source=na…)

➡️Included 300+ studies covering genetic, environmental, immune, toxicologic, and vaccine-related factors.

➡️Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their excipients, 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link, while 29 reported null results.

➡️🔥Only 12 studies compared fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children—and every one showed superior health outcomes among the unvaccinated.

➡️Studies reporting no association consistently lacked genuinely unvaccinated control groups, relied on registry data rather than clinical assessments, and failed to confirm vaccine records.

➡️None employed a formal non-inferiority framework to evaluate autism as a safety endpoint, leaving neurodevelopmental risk effectively untested.

➡️Across multiple biological domains, evidence converged on shared mechanisms—immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by antigen, preservative, and adjuvant exposure during critical neurodevelopmental windows.

➡️Clustered and early-timed vaccination correlated with higher ASD risk.

🔥Non-vaccine risk factors—older parents, premature delivery, common genetic variants, siblings with autism, maternal immune activation, in utero drug exposure, environmental toxicants, and gut-brain axis alterations —also contribute, but none can fully explain the sharp rise in autism that coincided with the expansion of the U.S. vaccine schedule post-1986.

🛑No study has ever assessed the entire pediatric vaccine schedule for neurodevelopmental outcomes through age 9 or 18.

➡️Autism prevalence has now reached 1 in 31 U.S. children, underscoring an urgent need for comprehensive safety reevaluation and unvaccinated control cohorts in future studies.
Thank you to the McCullough Foundation and all of the co-authors on this paper for this important and groundbreaking research. @P_McCulloughMD will join The HighWire this Thursday at 11 AM PT/2 PM ET to discuss this study in detail.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The HighWire

The HighWire Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HighWireTalk

Oct 23
🚨CRITICISMS & RESPONSES:

The following summarizes and responds to criticisms published by Henry Ford, The Conversation, and Stat News regarding the unpublished study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children in the Henry Ford Health System.

We address these criticisms not because we must, and not to demonstrate that this is a “perfect” study, but because science demands debate. ICAN has not claimed that this unpublished study is without limitations. However, if it is thrown out, then one must throw out most of the studies in the already limited universe of post-licensure vaccine safety literature. People should carefully assess this and every study, and raise challenges, highlight limitations, and discuss flaws. That is scientific debate, and everyone should be free to engage in it and to do so without fear of professional reprisal.

(LINK: aninconvenientstudy.com/criticisms)Image
Criticism:  The size of the unvaccinated group was smaller than the size of the vaccinated group.

Response: The difference in the size of the vaccinated group (16,511 children) and the unvaccinated group (1,957 children) is not a serious issue since the study calculated the “rate” between these two groups. The numbers in each group are also large enough to have statistical significance. Studies routinely compare the rate of harm between groups of different sizes, just like what was done in this study. Rejecting this study because group sizes were different would mean throwing out most studies in the medical literature.Image
Criticism: The unvaccinated children were, on average, followed for a shorter duration and hence, were less likely to be diagnosed with a chronic disease (so-called “surveillance bias”).

Response: The unpublished study directly acknowledges and accounts for potential surveillance bias, explaining:

"Since median enrollment time was shorter in the unexposed [i.e. the unvaccinated] group, a sensitivity analysis for developing a chronic health condition was conducted for subjects enrolled in the health plan for at least 1-year, 3-years and 5-years which demonstrated consistent results. Vaccine exposure was associated with higher incidence … as well as a higher risk for developing a chronic health condition for subjects enrolled at least 1-year (HR [Hazard Ratio] 2.84, CI [Confidence Interval] 2.38-3.38), 3-years (HR 3.48, CI 2.74-4.42), and 5-years (HR 4.05, CI 2.82-5.83)."

This means that when including only children enrolled from birth and for at least five years, the result was an even higher rate of chronic health issues among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated children. Further, if the chronic health rate between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups was due to differences in enrollment time, then we would expect the “HR” or “hazard ratio” number in the above quote to have gotten smaller the longer the duration of enrollment. Instead, the hazard ratio got larger.

Additionally, the CDC white paper on how to conduct a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study, which the study’s lead author agreed was followed in conducting the unpublished study, states that many more children are diagnosed with numerous relevant health outcomes from birth through the age of 2 than from ages 3-8 years old. So, the shorter time period should not have a large effect, if any, on diagnosed health outcomes. Here is a copy of the table (3.d on p. 32) from the white paper:

Regardless, even if the researchers had not done the sensitivity analysis described above, this limitation should not render the study unpublishable. To the contrary, it should, as per the scientific method, lead to additional studies that could better address this purported limitation.Image
Read 10 tweets
Oct 22
🧵THREAD: FDA Approved Pfizer Drug to Treat Serious COVID-19 Side Effect Just Two Months After Rollout of COVID-19 Vaccines:

Just two months after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, FDA granted Pfizer approval to start marketing its drug, Panzyga, for the treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), a life-threatening neurological autoimmune condition. CIDP has since been documented as a serious adverse reaction to the mRNA vaccines.Image
Back in April of 2020, before its COVID-19 vaccine human clinical trials started, Pfizer submitted an application to FDA asking to market its immunodeficiency drug, Panzyga, as a treatment for CIDP. Could data from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine preclinical animal trials have pointed to neurological issues (such as CIDP) even then, possibly prompting Pfizer’s desire to market this drug for that condition?

See more: fda.gov/media/145883/d…Image
Coincidentally, FDA sat on Pfizer’s request to market Panzyga for CIDP for almost a year before suddenly approving it on February 12, 2021.

At that point, the COVID-19 vaccine had been rolled out to over 42 million Americans and the V-safe and VAERS data was rolling in. FDA may have seen an early safety signal for CIDP and recognized the need for the drug.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 11
💉🧵THREAD: CDC Concedes Never Conducted Vaccinated v. Unvaccinated Study.

We are pulling this from the archives because this was initially published in 2021.

On July 29, 2020, after months of false claims and objections, the CDC finally conceded that it could not find a single study comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children and that it “has not conducted a study of health outcomes in vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations.”

LINK: icandecide.org/article/cdc-co…Image
Parents, doctors, and scientists have, for decades, demanded that the CDC compare the health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 

This is, in part, because the increase in the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule over the last 30 years -from 8 vaccine injections to 50 vaccine injections (plus two injections during pregnancy) - has occurred in lockstep with the increase in the rate of autoimmune, developmental, and neurological disorders in children from 12.8% to 54%.
The demand for this study has grown so great that even the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2013 issued a report stating that the CDC could and should perform this study, explaining that it “is possible to make this comparison [between vaccinated and unvaccinated children] through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as VSD [the Vaccine Safety Datalink paid for by the CDC].”  

Incredibly, the CDC then spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to have scientists, such as Dr. Stanley Plotkin, write a white paper, published in 2015, on how to conduct this simple study.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 10
💉🧵NO RECORDS FOUND: CDC Unable to Support Claim that COVID-19 Vaccine Spike Protein is Quickly Cleared from the Body

🛑For at least two years, CDC claimed that “After the body produces an immune response, it discards all of the [COVID-19] vaccine ingredients, just as it would discard any substance that cells no longer need.” ICAN’s (@ICANdecide) attorneys challenged CDC to support this claim with facts. Here’s what we found.Image
In its overwhelming zeal to promote the novel mRNA COVID-19 vaccines as “safe and effective” at all costs, CDC made many dubious claims on its website.

🛑One of those claims on its “Overview of COVID-19 Vaccines” webpage confidently asserted as late as July 2024 that “The mRNA from the vaccines is broken down within a few days after vaccination and discarded from the body.”

(LINK: web.archive.org/web/2024071319…)Image
This statement came as quite a surprise to ICAN, since multiple studies (published while CDC still had this claim on its site) have shown that the spike protein can linger for months, if not years, in some vaccinated people. In fact, a Yale preprint study showed that the spike protein could persist for up to 709 days!

Link: medrxiv.org/content/10.110…Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 1
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE DISNEY MEASLES OUTBREAK

Del breaks down the California Department of Health report made in response to the 2014 Disneyland measles outbreak, revealing that vaccinated individuals played a significant role in spreading the disease themselves.
DID THE MEASLES VACCINATION PROGRAM BACKFIRE?

Del questions the efficacy of measles vaccination programs by looking at the unachieved elimination of measles yearly cycles, RNA shedding statistics more than 100 days post vaccination, and more.
CAN THOSE VAXXED AGAINST THE MEASLES BE ASYMPTOMATIC & INFECTIOUS?

Providing context to the failed Sri Lankan measles elimination campaign in 2019, Del dives into the science showing that children who received the measles vaccine become slowly more susceptible to infection and more asymptomatic as they grow older.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 22, 2023
1 WHO IS STANLEY PLOTKIN? | Plotkin on Vaccines

A thread of excerpts from the deposition of the 'Godfather of V*ccines,' Stanley A. Plotkin, as deposed by @ICANdecide Lead Attorney @AaronSiriSG

First, it's important to understand who Stanley Plotkin is to the v*ccine world.
2 THE USE OF ABORTED FETUSES IN V*CCINES

When asked how many fetuses Plotkin has worked with, he initially says 'two.'

AARON SIRI, Esq., guides Dr. Plotkin through his own studies, revealing a much, much larger number.

If everyone knew this...

#PlotkinOnVaccines
3 HEP B V*CCINE: FIVE DAYS OF SAFETY TESTING?

Hepatitis B V*ccine, in the U.S., is given to healthy newborn babies on their first day of life, and it was only tested for safety for 5 days in trials.

#PlotkinOnVaccines #Hepatitis #HepB
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(