@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO Funny how you insist Ukraine can change its constitution and foreign policy because it’s “sovereign,” yet deny Russia the exact same logical consequence regarding commitments it relied upon. That’s not law, it’s selective reasoning. You can’t have it both ways: either sovereignty
@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO carries consequences for all, or it’s meaningless. Dude, your logic should work both ways, not just one.
@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO @threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with OlgaRom🇷🇺🇷🇸🇮🇱🇫🇷🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

OlgaRom🇷🇺🇷🇸🇮🇱🇫🇷🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rinrom_r

Oct 31
@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO That’s not quite accurate. The 1990 Declaration was indeed adopted by the Supreme Council of the Ukrainian SSR, but that same body legally transformed itself into the Verkhovna Rada of independent Ukraine in 1991. The Declaration was explicitly reaffirmed in subsequent
@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO Ukrainian constitutional and legal acts as a foundational document of the modern Ukrainian state. In fact, Article 2 of the Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine (24 August 1991) directly references the 1990 Declaration as its legal and political basis.
@sonofbelial @Alex_Oloyede2 @NATO So, yes, the continuity is clear: the state that declared sovereignty and neutrality in 1990 is the same legal entity that became independent in 1991. As for neutrality, no, it wasn’t a “treaty,” but it was a formal political commitment, accepted both internally and
Read 5 tweets
Dec 19, 2024
About this picture. I don't like the USSR and I think it is the most difficult period in our country. But I know the history of my country. Most of the Bolsheviks were not Jews. Most of the rulers from the USSR were not Jews, and Stalin was a Georgian in general. Yes, there were
those who had their wealth taken from them, those who people falsely lied about were shot (rehabilitation of convicts still happens), there was famine due to weather (it was in Europe too), poor crops, there were typhus and molaria diseases.
But they won't tell you that in your school.
Ukraine was independent then, but as part of the USSR. The famine was all over the country, even in my place in the Urals. When Moscow found out about the drought, all the ships that were at sea with grain were returned.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(