Mike Fragoso Profile picture
Nov 2 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Here’s the thing: SNAP’s authorization has lapsed. So even if the $3b (or however many billion the Judge from Motley Rice thinks) exists, the program requiring its expenditure does not. 1/9
They don’t cover this in School House Rock but how a bill becomes a law happens twice for a government program: first when the program is authorized and second when it’s funded via appropriations. McConnell is assuming this is all about approps but it’s actually both. 2/9
Is there money in a contingency fund? Sure, probably. At minimum there’s $3b available through 09/2026. Maybe there’s another $3b available through 09/2027 but none of that necessarily matters. 3/9
You see, the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 was most recently reauthorized in the 2018 Farm Bill. That authorization ran out in 2023 and subsequent CRs have *carried that authorization* for their length. 4/9
This means that SNAP’s authorization expired with the CR on October 1st. The program is no longer in effect, and with it this entitlement. 5/9 Image
Congress will occasionally fund an unauthorized program (it did it for years with VAWA) but the funding is not an authorization. It’s simply a pot of money. It is highly unlikely that the provision of contingency funds for the execution of the entitlement also extends it. 6/9
At minimum McConnell should have explained it. The likely answer is that the money is there until its end date for the Secretary to use as she deems necessary. But the statutory mandate for its use simply isn’t there. The money could arguably be gone, too. It’s thorny! 7/9
McConnell is very active on Twitter so maybe he’ll read this. If so, look, don’t feel too bad, Your Honor: very few judges understand how legislation actually works—even the good conservative ones! But maybe less snark against Trump and more circumspection? 8/9
Instead McConnell is ordering the executive to go spend money in accounts he seems to have found online in order to fund a program that lacks congressional authorization. No one who follows McConnell on Twitter will be surprised by this, but we should still expect better. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Fragoso

Mike Fragoso Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mike_frags

Oct 26
At the outset of the current Trump administration, I had an op-ed in the WSJ on how law firms who terrorized the Trump 1 were signaling their Trump savvy to clients. I explained why that was a joke. Well, in today’s WaPo it seems some firms got the message. 1/12 Image
Much of my piece involved how Biglaw gave Trump 1 alumni the cold shoulder, but I also discussed how Biglaw’s pro-bono industrial complex had fielded an army against Trump 1 and might do the same this time. 2/12 Image
Of course none of this is free—it’s cross-subsidized by the paying clients. I wondered if it’s really in those paying clients’ interests, under Republican government, to be represented by institutionalized Democrat impact litigation shops. 3/12 Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 8
The Planned Parenthood TRO is probably the most insane judicial action this administration. A TRO directing an appropriation in the face of enacted statute is like Michelangelo-level resistance. Some have argued SCOTUS should reassign the case and there’s a lot to that. 1/x
There’s a fascinating article on reassignment from the Stanford Law Review. It starts with a famous sentencing case where CA2 reassigned a case because the trial judge was both resisting and evading review. (Sound familiar?) 2/x Image
It turns out reassignment isn’t some esoteric phenomenon. Every circuit asserts the power to do it. 3/x Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 6
Jeff Flake gave my my start in politics and for that I’m grateful, but his commentary keeps missing the mark. Bc he’s not really in the game anymore he misinterprets what happened to Tillis, gives flawed advice, and downplays the threat of Democrats. 🧵1/21
Let’s start with TT. As I’ve said before in this context, it’s just not right to say that he refused to cling to Trump to win a primary. His problem was that Trump and Leadership wouldn’t let him move center *on policy* for the general election. 2/21
This simply isn’t JF’s morality tale. Maybe TT will convert it into such a tale in the coming months? But that would be unwise. The eternal morality play puts you on JF’s trajectory; the process/policy story on Sinema’s. Knowing TT, he’d prefer the latter. 3/21
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(