🚨🔱 CONTROL OF SCIENCE — THE DEEPER NETWORK 🔱🚨
“This is wild,” said @VigilantFox — and indeed it is.
@EricRWeinstein reveals how Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Maxwell’s Pergamon Press were part of a “control mechanism” — shaping which scientific discoveries were allowed to see daylight, and which were buried. Epstein, Weinstein notes, “was absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department” and “trying to control science.”
But Epstein wasn’t the only one who dreamed of controlling science.
💰 John D. Arnold and his sister Laura Arnold have pursued a similar goal — not through private islands, but through their so-called philanthropic vessel, Arnold Ventures LLC (formerly the Laura and John Arnold Foundation).
Through funding conduits such as PubPeer “PubSmear” and Retraction Watch — two core pillars of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob — the Arnolds built an influence web that manipulates narratives, silences dissent, and rewrites reputations under the guise of “scientific integrity.”
A central figure in this operation: Ivan Oransky —
👉 Co-founder of Retraction Watch (under the Center for Scientific Integrity, its parent nonprofit),
👉 Editor-in-Chief of The Transmitter,
👉 Executive Director of the Center for Scientific Integrity, and crucially,
👉 Board member of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Foundation itself.
⚠️ Yet none of Retraction Watch’s or CSI’s public statements disclose this blatant conflict of interest — a direct bridge between their supposedly “independent” editorial watchdog role and the very anonymous smear-based system they claim to cover impartially.
🧩 We have already documented how Oransky’s Transmitter coordinated with Science magazine and Wikipedia in the smear operation targeting Nobel Laureate Thomas C. Südhof — a textbook example of the PubPeer “PubSmear” pipeline in action.
It is the same playbook — the same will to control science, suppress truth, and dominate narrative.
🔱 Stay with @SciGuardians as we continue to expose the networks, names, and funding trails behind this deception.
🧵(1/3)
“This is wild,” said @VigilantFox — and indeed it is.
@EricRWeinstein reveals how Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Maxwell’s Pergamon Press were part of a “control mechanism” — shaping which scientific discoveries were allowed to see daylight, and which were buried. Epstein, Weinstein notes, “was absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department” and “trying to control science.”
But Epstein wasn’t the only one who dreamed of controlling science.
💰 John D. Arnold and his sister Laura Arnold have pursued a similar goal — not through private islands, but through their so-called philanthropic vessel, Arnold Ventures LLC (formerly the Laura and John Arnold Foundation).
Through funding conduits such as PubPeer “PubSmear” and Retraction Watch — two core pillars of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob — the Arnolds built an influence web that manipulates narratives, silences dissent, and rewrites reputations under the guise of “scientific integrity.”
A central figure in this operation: Ivan Oransky —
👉 Co-founder of Retraction Watch (under the Center for Scientific Integrity, its parent nonprofit),
👉 Editor-in-Chief of The Transmitter,
👉 Executive Director of the Center for Scientific Integrity, and crucially,
👉 Board member of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Foundation itself.
⚠️ Yet none of Retraction Watch’s or CSI’s public statements disclose this blatant conflict of interest — a direct bridge between their supposedly “independent” editorial watchdog role and the very anonymous smear-based system they claim to cover impartially.
🧩 We have already documented how Oransky’s Transmitter coordinated with Science magazine and Wikipedia in the smear operation targeting Nobel Laureate Thomas C. Südhof — a textbook example of the PubPeer “PubSmear” pipeline in action.
It is the same playbook — the same will to control science, suppress truth, and dominate narrative.
🔱 Stay with @SciGuardians as we continue to expose the networks, names, and funding trails behind this deception.
🧵(1/3)
🎥 Watch how the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob operates — and who funds it, why they are rattled, and how the future of post-publication peer review is ScienceGuardians™.👇
(2/3)
(2/3)
🔱🧾 Full documentation, archived evidence, and cross-referenced materials now available on our Substack:
🔗 scienceguardians.substack.com/p/control-of-s…
🔱 Follow ScienceGuardians™ on Substack for full investigations, evidence dossiers, and exposés dismantling corruption in science:
👉 substack.com/@scienceguardi…
(3/3)
🔗 scienceguardians.substack.com/p/control-of-s…
🔱 Follow ScienceGuardians™ on Substack for full investigations, evidence dossiers, and exposés dismantling corruption in science:
👉 substack.com/@scienceguardi…
(3/3)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
