Will ⚓ Profile picture
Nov 7 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵Some (hopefully) simple questions that I hope someone can answer for us: 1. Is it actually the teaching of @The_ACNA that there is no Scriptural "category" of "whistleblower," even with many examples of individuals and prophets who challenged established power structures? 1/
2. Is it actually the position of @The_ACNA that a bishop who may be engaging in misconduct can order his presbyters to remain silent about it, whether by fiat or use of "Godly Admonition"? 2/
3. Is it actually the position of @The_ACNA that a presbyter seeking canonically authorized review of his inhibition should be episcopally berated for two pages rather than simply informed his petition was denied b/c it didn't meet the standard? 3/
4. Would the process have been any different if the presbyter alleged that the bishop was assaulting the complainant or, e.g., attempting to remove the presbyter from office as rector through unlawful means? If so, why? 4/
5. What will happen when the Board of Inquiry in the Jones matter returns its finding, as the interim leadership team are both conflicted out of acting on the case - another interim ad hoc sub-team? Who will keep track of who can do what to whom? 5/
6. What are "you" teaching the bishops about their theological and canonical role in your "baby bishops' school"? Who is teaching them? Can you make the materials public? Because something isn't quite right and we'd like a look. 6/
7. Won't many of these issues go away if the proposed revisions to Title IV are enacted next summer? 7/
8. Was there, by chance, a former chancellor involved in writing the letter from the Bishop in the article? If so, I don't recommend you let that person near documents with pastoral implications in the future w/o some remedial pastoral formation. 8/
9. I should have mentioned it earlier, but at some point the canons need to be amended to stop the use of psychiatric examinations against (trigger warning!) "whistleblowers" without more than episcopal hostility as a cause. 9/9
A post script: this practice is downright Soviet. See, e.g., Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will ⚓

Will ⚓ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @monkofjustice

Jul 30
More on the Title IV proposal: two concerns - the Sentence Review Board and the Admonition. 🧵
The Sentence Review Board is a panel of three senior bishops that reviews the sentence imposed by the Tribunal that tried a bishop (w/bishops, clergy, and laity). The Board may "confirm or adjust the [sentence] as it may, in its absolute discretion, consider appropriate." 🤔2/
Seems like a convicted bishop gets an extra bite at the apple from this Board, which has no basis in the ACNA Constitution, but was sought by an episcopal member of the GTF. And this in addition to the ability to appeal the sentence to the Provincial Tribunal. 👎 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jul 18
The Consecration Vows of an ACNA bishop are much broader than depicted in the ACNA governance post. From the BCP: Image
Nor is the ACNA post consistent with the canonical description of episcopal responsibilities: Image
The unseemly nature of the document, posted in the middle of an episcopal trial and clearly favoring the controversial interpretation offered by the defendant bishop, is either an effort to put a finger on the scale or gross incompetence. @The_ACNA , which is it?
Read 4 tweets
Oct 23, 2024
Grateful for the interview, but some thoughts on the response he gave on the disciplinary reform. 1/4

Archbishop Steve Wood on where the ACNA has been, and where it's headed religionnews.com/2024/10/23/arc…
He said the proposal for Title IV reform didn't include input from bishops and chancellors. The committee that drafted the proposal included no less than Bishop Guernsey and the provincial chancellors; Ward was a regular participant. 2/4
Among the other members were also at least two other diocesan chancellors. The "incremental" option now being pursued by the archbishop was constantly espoused by the bishop and Chancellor Ward but overwhelmingly rejected by the rest of the panel. 3/4
Read 5 tweets
Oct 16, 2024
🧵Here's the ask from the Archbishop below. Note 3 things:
- the question "what problem are we solving w/Title IV revision" is the question used by the provincial chancellors to slow the work of the Title IV committee last year; 1/ Image
@ACNAtoo @The_ACNA
- "I think it's time to review the Title IV canons." But they were reviewed, exhaustively, last year by a committee that included lawyers, advocates, ombudsman, chancellors, and a bishop, and a proposal forwarded to the bishops and the GTF. 2/
Read 5 tweets
Jun 26, 2024
Interesting event yesterday in the ACNA Assembly. 🧵
The Council had proposed the following text for ratification by the Assembly (my highlight) (1/): Image
Objection from the floor noted that this amendment would declare that "the province has no duty to make sure these policies exist and are followed, no duty to see that the flock is protected from the wolves. " 2/
The speaker noted the misguided nature of the amendment and observed, "Canon law is a way of coordinating the life of the church, and it is an expression of our theology. It is not the place for lawyerly disclaimers of duty, for the contractual fine print that tries to get someone out of liability. To put that into our canons is to misunderstand what canons are for." 3/
Read 8 tweets
Aug 21, 2022
@ByzCat @OleCade Background reading with some good pointers can be found in Harton's Elements of the Spiritual Life, chs IV, V, and VI (last is on gifts of the Spirit - very helpful). Thornton also recommends examen based on the capital sins / cardinal virtues but I cannot put my finger on it. 1/
@ByzCat @OleCade Best short treatment is from Fr. John Hardon, SJ, which focuses on the theological virtues and can be found all over, but also here: ewtn.com/catholicism/li… 2/
@ByzCat @OleCade Good use of the virtues along with the capital sins can also be found here: eternalrevolution.com/virtue-vice-ex…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(