The Senate Judiciary Committee passed the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025, which would remove a “sunset” date of Dec. 31, 2026, from a 2016 bill of the same name, unanimously on Thursday.
“This legislation clarifies and strengthens procedural protections for Holocaust survivors and their heirs by ensuring Nazi looted art claims will be considered on the merits,” stated @JohnCornyn, who led the 2016 bill. “With the rising tide of antisemitism around the world, this bill sends a message that Holocaust survivors and their heirs will not be forgotten, and that justice does not have a time limit.”
According to the bill sponsors, some 100,000 artworks that the Nazis stole have yet to be returned to rightful owners. “Unfortunately, many museums, governments and institutions have contradicted Congress’s intent and obstructed justice by stonewalling legitimate claims, obscuring provenance and employing aggressive legal tactics designed to exhaust and outlast survivors and their families,” the senators said.
“Rather than embracing transparency and reconciliation, too many have chosen to entrench and litigate, effectively preserving possession of stolen works rather than returning them to their rightful owners,” they said. “Moreover, some court cases have interpreted the law narrowly, leaving survivors without recourse.”
The new bill would remove the 2016 law’s sunset provision and “amend and reauthorize the original law to ensure victims of the Holocaust are not denied justice by legal loopholes, institutional intransigence or the mere passage of time,” the senators said. “As another insidious wave of antisemitism hits society, this legislation would reaffirm our commitment to the Jewish people and Holocaust survivors by sending a clear message that the United States will not allow looting to be legitimized, justice to be denied or Holocaust profiteering to be tolerated.”
Rabbi A.D. Motzen, national director of government affairs at @AgudahNews, told JNS that the bill “will assist Holocaust survivors and their families in their struggle to recover art looted from them by the Nazis.”
“The amended HEAR Act will hopefully stop museums and other entities from using the courts to obstruct justice and prevent stolen art from being returned to its rightful owners,” he said. “We thank the many sponsors for their support of this bill and urge the full Senate to move this legislation forward.”
Vlad Khaykin, North America executive vice president of social impact and partnerships at @simonwiesenthal, told JNS that “no act of law can ever fully recompense crimes as monstrous as the Holocaust.”
Still, the bill “represents an important step toward justice, ensuring that survivors and their families have a fair opportunity to reclaim what was wrongfully taken from them,” Khaykin said. “ We commend this bipartisan effort to uphold memory, moral responsibility and the rule of law in the face of one of history’s darkest chapters.”
The bill makes “very, very clear” that Congress doesn’t want any of the defenses that courts have made in the past decade over procedure and passage of time, according to Joel Greenberg, president of the nonprofit Art Ashes, which helps families recover art that the Nazis stole.
“This basically says that what the court should only focus on was who owned the painting and was it stolen,” Greenberg told JNS. “Especially in this time of rising antisemitism, both in the states and Europe, it’s a very important message that Congress is sending: we’re standing against those who want to deny that the Holocaust happened and remembering the survivors and their families.”
@tedcruz, who serves on the judiciary panel and is a cosponsor of the bill, said on the Senate floor that the bill “was written to make sure that justice for Holocaust victims is not lost to paperwork, procedure or the passage of time” and that families “can seek restitution on the merits, not be turned away on a technicality.”
“If you are a museum, if you are a corporation, if you are a railroad, if you are a family or an individual and you are displaying the art that was pilfered by Nazis, you ought to be ashamed of yourself, and you have no right to keep that stolen art,” he said. “You are glorifying evil.”
“The law should never be a shield for theft,” Cruz said. “Especially theft born of genocide. The law was never meant to be a refuge for those who profit from theft.”
There is “substantial evidence” that the Oakland Unified School District discriminated against Jews by circulating a map of the Middle East that deleted Israel, the California Department of Education determined on Oct. 20.
The seven-page finding obtained by the @jewishsf states that in August 2021, during Arab American Heritage Month, a slideshow presentation in the district featured a map that excluded Israel. The map also appeared in a district guide that the district published in 2023 and in a resource guide that it disseminated in 2024, per the report.
Though the district determined that the map violated board policies, it “did not specifically address the allegation of discrimination in the form of antisemitism,” which the state education department said is “inconsistent with the law.”
“The material findings of fact, supported by substantial evidence, demonstrated a failure to include Israel in a map of the current Middle East, and instead, labeling the entire location as ‘Palestine,’” the department said. “This constituted discrimination toward Jewish persons.”
A spokesman for the district told JNS that the district “experienced two situations in recent years when celebratory messages for Arab American Heritage Month went out to our community with incorrect information.”
“In both cases, an incorrect map was used that excluded the nation of Israel,” the spokesman said. “That was an oversight on the part of the district team, and once the team became aware of this issue, it immediately replaced the map and issued a public apology.”
“The first time was clearly an oversight; the second time showed a lack of systems in place to ensure similar mistakes would not happen again,” the spokesman said. “Those systems have since been installed within the district.”
When four anti-Israel, masked protesters with keffiyehs disrupted Claremont Hillel’s Oct. 7 commemoration at Pomona College in southern California on Oct. 15, Jill Stark’s “first instinct was to protect the students,” the director of community relations at the Hillel told JNS.
“That was why I just went and I stood there,” she said.
Video footage that circulated on social media showed people forming a barrier to block the anti-Israel protesters from entering the room further. Stark was among those people.
She told JNS that protesters “dressed like Hamas terrorists” shouted statements like “Zionists are not welcome here” and “you’re all complicit in genocide” at the event, which included a survivor of the Oct. 7 attacks who showed photos and footage from that day.
“They were reading from scripts,” she told JNS of the anti-Israel protesters. “They had clearly been trained on what they were supposed to do and say.”
The protesters engaged in “targeted intimidation of Jewish students, marking one of our community’s most painful moments,” Stark said.
She was among six professors and staff members to form a barrier around the disruptors until other professors escorted them out. The barrier was a “two-layered, half-circle ring” shape, with those involved standing “shoulder-to-shoulder,” she said.
“They would have had to go through us to get further into the room,” Stark said. “It kept them contained.”
A month-and-a-half after the deadline that a House panel gave the Wikimedia Foundation to provide documents about how it responds to bias, including Jew-hatred, on Wikipedia, the San Francisco-based nonprofit has yet to send the required materials, Carlie Baker, press assistant to @RepNancyMace, told JNS.
“The Wikimedia Foundation is engaging with the Oversight Committee about its request, but it has not satisfied document production at this time,” Baker said on Tuesday. (JNS sought comment from the foundation.)
Mace, who chairs the House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology and Government Innovation, and Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), who chairs the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, penned a letter to the CEO of the foundation on Aug. 27.
The lawmakers sought “documents and information related to actions by Wikipedia volunteer editors caught violating platform policies,” as well as the CEO’s “efforts to thwart intentional, organized efforts to inject bias into sensitive topics.” They gave the foundation until Sept. 10 to provide the documents.
The Republican lawmakers stated in their Aug. 27 letter that a recent report “raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the State of Israel.”
@tedcruz, chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, sent a letter to Wikimedia’s CEO on Oct. 3 requesting “information about ideological bias on the Wikipedia platform and at the Wikimedia Foundation.”
The senator stated that there is “detailed evidence of a coordinated editing campaign to push antisemitic content on the platform.”
“Through more than 1.5 million edits over the past decade, a coordinated group of editors pushed antisemitic narratives on Wikipedia while whitewashing the activities of groups like Hamas,” he wrote. “These were not ‘organic changes that occur on Wikipedia as editors update pages to reflect evolving understandings of complex issues,’ but rather a ‘long-running, coordinated scheme that involved serious infractions to Wikipedia’s anti-bias policies.’”
Wikipedia, one of the most viewed sites on the internet, has hosted a page on “Gaza genocide” since July 3, 2024. Since Sept. 22, Wikipedia has linked to the “Gaza genocide” article, which accused Israel of war crimes, in an “in the news” section on its main page, which millions of people view daily.
@AJCGlobal told JNS that Wikipedia is “elevating reckless and biased charges of genocide as fact,” and given how many genocide scholars disagree with that statement, the crowd-sourced encyclopedia “showcases how dangerous this can be.”
The nonprofit “previously raised concerns that Wikipedia is an information hub that is controlled by anonymous editors, who have their own biases, in a world in which fact and truth are now too easily distorted,” an AJC spokeswoman, who declined to be named, told JNS.
Vlad Khaykin, North America executive vice president of social impact and partnerships at @simonwiesenthal, told JNS that Wikipedia has become an “echo chamber for propaganda” by stating in a neutral voice that there is “ongoing genocide” in Gaza.
“For decades, some of the world’s most despotic regimes and their enablers have waged a propaganda campaign to weaponize international law, and the genocide convention specifically, against Israel and its allies,” he said.
“That campaign has now insinuated itself into Wikipedia, transforming what ought to be a repository of human knowledge into, at least in this instance, an echo chamber for propaganda,” Khaykin told JNS.
The @ZOA_National filed a complaint against the Massachusetts Teachers Association, alleging that the union has fostered a hostile and discriminatory environment against its Jewish members since Oct. 7.
The 26-page complaint, obtained by JNS, was filed with Andrea Joy Campbell, the attorney general of Massachusetts, on Aug. 13. It alleges that the union’s actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and state law.
Campbell’s office confirmed to JNS that it has received the complaint. JNS sought comment from the union.
The complaint states that various Jewish teachers have resigned from the 117,000-member union “because they could no longer tolerate being associated with an organization that is directing and fueling such hostility toward them.”
“It was shocking to us to see this incessant focus by the MTA on attacking and demonizing Israel and even Jews after the Hamas massacre,” Susan Tuchman, director of the ZOA’s Center for Law and Justice, told JNS.
She said the union has been doing this through resolutions, webinars and curriculum resources.
When the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform announced that it is investigating manipulation of information on Wikipedia, @lsanger, co-founder of the encyclopedia, welcomed the news.
“I am glad that Congress is investigating the use of foreign and U.S. government funds to pay for biased editing on Wikipedia,” Sanger, who has criticized Wikipedia frequently in recent years, told JNS.
Sanger told JNS that he asked U.S. President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur @elonmusk, who led the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, in February to enact a policy barring federal workers from editing Wikipedia on the clock and preventing federal dollars from funding edits to the encyclopedia.
“There is clearly massive support for this sort of investigation,” Sanger said.
@RepJamesComer, who chairs the House panel, and @RepNancyMace, who chairs its Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology and Government Innovation, stated on Wednesday that they are probing “organized efforts, undertaken in violation of Wikipedia platform rules, to influence U.S. public opinion on important and sensitive topics by manipulating Wikipedia articles.”
The lawmakers wrote to Maryana Iskander, CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation, seeking “documents and information related to actions by Wikipedia volunteer editors caught violating platform policies, as well as Iskander’s efforts to thwart intentional, organized efforts to inject bias into sensitive topics.” (JNS sought comment from the foundation.)
“Multiple studies and reports have highlighted efforts to manipulate information on the Wikipedia platform for propaganda aimed at Western audiences,” the lawmakers wrote. “One recent report raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the State of Israel.”